Cargando…

Vision screening using a smartphone platform

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a platform designed for pediatricians to screen amblyopia using a smartphone. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive children who received visual screening using a smartphone platform were retrospectively reviewed. The sma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Debert, Iara, da Costa, Douglas Rodrigues, Polati, Mariza, Falabretti, Janaina Guerra, Susanna, Remo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35544901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020021IN
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a platform designed for pediatricians to screen amblyopia using a smartphone. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive children who received visual screening using a smartphone platform were retrospectively reviewed. The smartphone was used with a flash concentrator case and a software for capturing images of both eyes simultaneously by a photorefraction mechanism. The platform performance was compared to the comprehensive ophthalmological examination, which is considered the gold standard for detecting amblyopia. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the software in detecting amblyopia risk factors were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 157 children were included, with a mean age of 6.0±.5 years (range 5–7). In 94% of the cases, the software was able to analyze the images and release a result, determining whether or not the child presented with amblyopia risk factors. Compared to the ophthalmological examination, the smartphone platform sensitivity in detecting amblyopia risk factors was 84%, the specificity was 74%, the positive predictive value was 86%, and the negative predictive value was 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of the smartphone photoscreening platform to detect amblyopia risk factors were within the range of traditional instrument-based vision screening technology. A smartphone photorefraction platform appears to be a promising cost-effective alternative to assist pediatricians and minimize obstacles to vision screening and amblyopia detection. Future studies are needed to gather additional comparative data.