Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

To evaluate the clinical application effect of spiral computed tomography (CT) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction based on artificial intelligence in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a CT 3D reconstruction model based on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) was established in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Kunpeng, Gao, Yan, Lv, Junwei, Li, Jian, Liu, Jingli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5794681
_version_ 1784705736915288064
author Zhang, Kunpeng
Gao, Yan
Lv, Junwei
Li, Jian
Liu, Jingli
author_facet Zhang, Kunpeng
Gao, Yan
Lv, Junwei
Li, Jian
Liu, Jingli
author_sort Zhang, Kunpeng
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the clinical application effect of spiral computed tomography (CT) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction based on artificial intelligence in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a CT 3D reconstruction model based on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) was established in this research, which was compared with the model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and used in clinical practice. Then, 62 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent TAVI surgery were recruited as the research objects. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the multislice spiral CT scan (MSCT) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in predicting the type of TAVI surgical valve were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the mean absolute error (MAE) (0.01) and root mean square error (RMSE) (0.086) of the MBIR model were higher than the reconstruction model in this research. The structural similarity (SSIM) (0.831) and peak signal-to noise ratio (PSNR) (32.77 dB) of the MBIR model were lower than the reconstruction model, and the differences were considerable (P < 0.05). Of the valve models selected based on the TTE measurement results, 35 cases were accurately predicted and 27 cases were incorrectly predicted. The accuracy of MSCT was 87.1%, the specificity was 98.84%, and the sensitivity was 92.87%; all of which were significantly higher than TTE (P < 0.05). In summary, compared with the MBIR reconstruction model, the imaging results of the model established in this research were closer to the real image. Compared with TTE, MSCT had higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity and can provide more accurate preoperative predictions for patients undergoing TAVI surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9095377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90953772022-05-12 Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Zhang, Kunpeng Gao, Yan Lv, Junwei Li, Jian Liu, Jingli Comput Math Methods Med Research Article To evaluate the clinical application effect of spiral computed tomography (CT) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction based on artificial intelligence in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a CT 3D reconstruction model based on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) was established in this research, which was compared with the model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and used in clinical practice. Then, 62 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent TAVI surgery were recruited as the research objects. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the multislice spiral CT scan (MSCT) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in predicting the type of TAVI surgical valve were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the mean absolute error (MAE) (0.01) and root mean square error (RMSE) (0.086) of the MBIR model were higher than the reconstruction model in this research. The structural similarity (SSIM) (0.831) and peak signal-to noise ratio (PSNR) (32.77 dB) of the MBIR model were lower than the reconstruction model, and the differences were considerable (P < 0.05). Of the valve models selected based on the TTE measurement results, 35 cases were accurately predicted and 27 cases were incorrectly predicted. The accuracy of MSCT was 87.1%, the specificity was 98.84%, and the sensitivity was 92.87%; all of which were significantly higher than TTE (P < 0.05). In summary, compared with the MBIR reconstruction model, the imaging results of the model established in this research were closer to the real image. Compared with TTE, MSCT had higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity and can provide more accurate preoperative predictions for patients undergoing TAVI surgery. Hindawi 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9095377/ /pubmed/35572825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5794681 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kunpeng Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Kunpeng
Gao, Yan
Lv, Junwei
Li, Jian
Liu, Jingli
Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_full Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_short Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
title_sort artificial intelligence-based spiral ct 3d reconstruction in transcatheter aortic valve implantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5794681
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangkunpeng artificialintelligencebasedspiralct3dreconstructionintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT gaoyan artificialintelligencebasedspiralct3dreconstructionintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT lvjunwei artificialintelligencebasedspiralct3dreconstructionintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT lijian artificialintelligencebasedspiralct3dreconstructionintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation
AT liujingli artificialintelligencebasedspiralct3dreconstructionintranscatheteraorticvalveimplantation