Cargando…
A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners
PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of five intraoral scanners (IOS) using a novel reference model for standardized performance evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five IOSs (Medit i500, Omnicam, Primescan, Trios 3, Trios 4) were used to di...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601353 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.63 |
_version_ | 1784705754694942720 |
---|---|
author | Karakas-Stupar, Irina Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula Joda, Tim |
author_facet | Karakas-Stupar, Irina Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula Joda, Tim |
author_sort | Karakas-Stupar, Irina |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of five intraoral scanners (IOS) using a novel reference model for standardized performance evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five IOSs (Medit i500, Omnicam, Primescan, Trios 3, Trios 4) were used to digitize the reference model, which represented a simplified full-arch situation with four abutment teeth. Each IOS was used five times by an experienced operator, resulting in 25 STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files. STL data were imported into 3D software (Final Surface(®)) and examined for inter- and intra-group analyses. Deviations in the parameter matching error were calculated. ANOVA F-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for inter-group comparisons (α = .05); and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for intra-group comparisons (in % ± SD). RESULTS: Primescan (matching error value: 0.015), Trios 3 (0.016), and Trios 4 (0.018) revealed comparable results with significantly higher accuracy compared to Medit i500 (0.035) and Omnicam (0.028) (P < .001). For intra-group comparison, Trios 4 demonstrated the most homogenous results (CV 15.8%). CONCLUSION: The novel reference model investigated in this study can be used to assess the performance of dental scanning technologies in the daily routine setting and in research settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9095454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90954542022-05-19 A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners Karakas-Stupar, Irina Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula Joda, Tim J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of five intraoral scanners (IOS) using a novel reference model for standardized performance evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five IOSs (Medit i500, Omnicam, Primescan, Trios 3, Trios 4) were used to digitize the reference model, which represented a simplified full-arch situation with four abutment teeth. Each IOS was used five times by an experienced operator, resulting in 25 STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files. STL data were imported into 3D software (Final Surface(®)) and examined for inter- and intra-group analyses. Deviations in the parameter matching error were calculated. ANOVA F-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for inter-group comparisons (α = .05); and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for intra-group comparisons (in % ± SD). RESULTS: Primescan (matching error value: 0.015), Trios 3 (0.016), and Trios 4 (0.018) revealed comparable results with significantly higher accuracy compared to Medit i500 (0.035) and Omnicam (0.028) (P < .001). For intra-group comparison, Trios 4 demonstrated the most homogenous results (CV 15.8%). CONCLUSION: The novel reference model investigated in this study can be used to assess the performance of dental scanning technologies in the daily routine setting and in research settings. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2022-04 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9095454/ /pubmed/35601353 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.63 Text en © 2022 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karakas-Stupar, Irina Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula Joda, Tim A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners |
title | A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners |
title_full | A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners |
title_fullStr | A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners |
title_short | A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners |
title_sort | novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601353 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.63 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karakasstuparirina anovelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners AT zitzmannnicolaursula anovelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners AT jodatim anovelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners AT karakasstuparirina novelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners AT zitzmannnicolaursula novelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners AT jodatim novelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners |