Cargando…

A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners

PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of five intraoral scanners (IOS) using a novel reference model for standardized performance evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five IOSs (Medit i500, Omnicam, Primescan, Trios 3, Trios 4) were used to di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karakas-Stupar, Irina, Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula, Joda, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601353
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.63
_version_ 1784705754694942720
author Karakas-Stupar, Irina
Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula
Joda, Tim
author_facet Karakas-Stupar, Irina
Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula
Joda, Tim
author_sort Karakas-Stupar, Irina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of five intraoral scanners (IOS) using a novel reference model for standardized performance evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five IOSs (Medit i500, Omnicam, Primescan, Trios 3, Trios 4) were used to digitize the reference model, which represented a simplified full-arch situation with four abutment teeth. Each IOS was used five times by an experienced operator, resulting in 25 STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files. STL data were imported into 3D software (Final Surface(®)) and examined for inter- and intra-group analyses. Deviations in the parameter matching error were calculated. ANOVA F-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for inter-group comparisons (α = .05); and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for intra-group comparisons (in % ± SD). RESULTS: Primescan (matching error value: 0.015), Trios 3 (0.016), and Trios 4 (0.018) revealed comparable results with significantly higher accuracy compared to Medit i500 (0.035) and Omnicam (0.028) (P < .001). For intra-group comparison, Trios 4 demonstrated the most homogenous results (CV 15.8%). CONCLUSION: The novel reference model investigated in this study can be used to assess the performance of dental scanning technologies in the daily routine setting and in research settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9095454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90954542022-05-19 A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners Karakas-Stupar, Irina Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula Joda, Tim J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of five intraoral scanners (IOS) using a novel reference model for standardized performance evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five IOSs (Medit i500, Omnicam, Primescan, Trios 3, Trios 4) were used to digitize the reference model, which represented a simplified full-arch situation with four abutment teeth. Each IOS was used five times by an experienced operator, resulting in 25 STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files. STL data were imported into 3D software (Final Surface(®)) and examined for inter- and intra-group analyses. Deviations in the parameter matching error were calculated. ANOVA F-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for inter-group comparisons (α = .05); and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for intra-group comparisons (in % ± SD). RESULTS: Primescan (matching error value: 0.015), Trios 3 (0.016), and Trios 4 (0.018) revealed comparable results with significantly higher accuracy compared to Medit i500 (0.035) and Omnicam (0.028) (P < .001). For intra-group comparison, Trios 4 demonstrated the most homogenous results (CV 15.8%). CONCLUSION: The novel reference model investigated in this study can be used to assess the performance of dental scanning technologies in the daily routine setting and in research settings. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2022-04 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9095454/ /pubmed/35601353 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.63 Text en © 2022 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karakas-Stupar, Irina
Zitzmann, Nicola Ursula
Joda, Tim
A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners
title A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners
title_full A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners
title_fullStr A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners
title_full_unstemmed A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners
title_short A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners
title_sort novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35601353
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.2.63
work_keys_str_mv AT karakasstuparirina anovelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners
AT zitzmannnicolaursula anovelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners
AT jodatim anovelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners
AT karakasstuparirina novelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners
AT zitzmannnicolaursula novelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners
AT jodatim novelreferencemodelfordentalscanningsystemevaluationanalysisoffiveintraoralscanners