Cargando…
Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2)
Olfactory dysfunction is common in COVID-19, and sudden-onset dysosmia is an early marker for wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over 10 000 mutations of SARS-CoV-2 have been registered, with variants of concern (VOC) under particular scrutiny. We report a telemedicine-based, multicentre, prospective c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
World Allergy Organization
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100653 |
_version_ | 1784705754943455232 |
---|---|
author | Klimek, Ludger Hagemann, Jan Hummel, Thomas Altundag, Aytug Hintschich, Constantin Stielow, Sabine Bousquet, Jean |
author_facet | Klimek, Ludger Hagemann, Jan Hummel, Thomas Altundag, Aytug Hintschich, Constantin Stielow, Sabine Bousquet, Jean |
author_sort | Klimek, Ludger |
collection | PubMed |
description | Olfactory dysfunction is common in COVID-19, and sudden-onset dysosmia is an early marker for wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over 10 000 mutations of SARS-CoV-2 have been registered, with variants of concern (VOC) under particular scrutiny. We report a telemedicine-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study with quantitative olfaction testing comparing 79 patients with a confirmed VOC-Delta (n = 21) or wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 infection. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection led to significant decrease of olfactory function in both cohorts. A majority of patients suffered from hyposmia or anosmia at inclusion with only 26 individuals performing normosmic. Sniffin'Sticks total scores were significantly higher for VOC-Delta patients at onset of illness, compared to WT patients (p < 0.001). At 4 weeks follow-up, olfaction scores recovered only partially for WT patients, thus odds of recovery were stronger in VOC-Delta patients. Also, subjective self-rating of chemosensory function was lower in WT, compared to VOC-Delta patients. The need for ongoing olfaction studies and their prognosis in SARS-CoV-2 background remains urgent, also in the light of increasing numbers of olfaction-related patient presentations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9095455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | World Allergy Organization |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90954552022-05-12 Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) Klimek, Ludger Hagemann, Jan Hummel, Thomas Altundag, Aytug Hintschich, Constantin Stielow, Sabine Bousquet, Jean World Allergy Organ J Full-Length Article Olfactory dysfunction is common in COVID-19, and sudden-onset dysosmia is an early marker for wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over 10 000 mutations of SARS-CoV-2 have been registered, with variants of concern (VOC) under particular scrutiny. We report a telemedicine-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study with quantitative olfaction testing comparing 79 patients with a confirmed VOC-Delta (n = 21) or wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 infection. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection led to significant decrease of olfactory function in both cohorts. A majority of patients suffered from hyposmia or anosmia at inclusion with only 26 individuals performing normosmic. Sniffin'Sticks total scores were significantly higher for VOC-Delta patients at onset of illness, compared to WT patients (p < 0.001). At 4 weeks follow-up, olfaction scores recovered only partially for WT patients, thus odds of recovery were stronger in VOC-Delta patients. Also, subjective self-rating of chemosensory function was lower in WT, compared to VOC-Delta patients. The need for ongoing olfaction studies and their prognosis in SARS-CoV-2 background remains urgent, also in the light of increasing numbers of olfaction-related patient presentations. World Allergy Organization 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9095455/ /pubmed/35578676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100653 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of World Allergy Organization. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Full-Length Article Klimek, Ludger Hagemann, Jan Hummel, Thomas Altundag, Aytug Hintschich, Constantin Stielow, Sabine Bousquet, Jean Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) |
title | Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) |
title_full | Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) |
title_fullStr | Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) |
title_full_unstemmed | Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) |
title_short | Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) |
title_sort | olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type sars-cov-2 infection than in the delta variant (b.1.617.2) |
topic | Full-Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9095455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klimekludger olfactorydysfunctionismoresevereinwildtypesarscov2infectionthaninthedeltavariantb16172 AT hagemannjan olfactorydysfunctionismoresevereinwildtypesarscov2infectionthaninthedeltavariantb16172 AT hummelthomas olfactorydysfunctionismoresevereinwildtypesarscov2infectionthaninthedeltavariantb16172 AT altundagaytug olfactorydysfunctionismoresevereinwildtypesarscov2infectionthaninthedeltavariantb16172 AT hintschichconstantin olfactorydysfunctionismoresevereinwildtypesarscov2infectionthaninthedeltavariantb16172 AT stielowsabine olfactorydysfunctionismoresevereinwildtypesarscov2infectionthaninthedeltavariantb16172 AT bousquetjean olfactorydysfunctionismoresevereinwildtypesarscov2infectionthaninthedeltavariantb16172 |