Cargando…

NIH funding of COVID-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterise and evaluate the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) grant allocation speed and pattern of COVID-19 research. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: COVID-19 NIH RePORTER Dataset was used to identify COVID-19 relevant grants. PARTICIPANTS: 1108 grants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balaguru, Logesvar, Dun, Chen, Meyer, Andrea, Hennayake, Sanuri, Walsh, Christi, Kung, Christopher, Cary, Brittany, Migliarese, Frank, Dai, Tinglong, Bai, Ge, Sutcliffe, Kathleen, Makary, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059041
_version_ 1784705889036402688
author Balaguru, Logesvar
Dun, Chen
Meyer, Andrea
Hennayake, Sanuri
Walsh, Christi
Kung, Christopher
Cary, Brittany
Migliarese, Frank
Dai, Tinglong
Bai, Ge
Sutcliffe, Kathleen
Makary, Martin
author_facet Balaguru, Logesvar
Dun, Chen
Meyer, Andrea
Hennayake, Sanuri
Walsh, Christi
Kung, Christopher
Cary, Brittany
Migliarese, Frank
Dai, Tinglong
Bai, Ge
Sutcliffe, Kathleen
Makary, Martin
author_sort Balaguru, Logesvar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterise and evaluate the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) grant allocation speed and pattern of COVID-19 research. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: COVID-19 NIH RePORTER Dataset was used to identify COVID-19 relevant grants. PARTICIPANTS: 1108 grants allocated to COVID-19 research. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was to determine the number of grants and funding amount the NIH allocated for COVID-19 by research type and clinical/scientific area. The secondary outcome was to calculate the time from the funding opportunity announcement to the award notice date. RESULTS: The NIH awarded a total of 56 169 grants in 2020, of which 2.0% (n=1108) wwas allocated for COVID-19 research. The NIH had a US$45.3 billion budget that year, of which 4.9% (US$2.2 billion) was allocated to COVID-19 research. The most common clinical/scientific areas were social determinants of health (n=278, 8.5% of COVID-19 funding), immunology (n=211, 25.8%) and pharmaceutical interventions research (n=208, 47.6%). There were 104 grants studying COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions, of which 2 grants studied the efficacy of face masks and 6 studied the efficacy of social distancing. Of the 83 COVID-19 funded grants on transmission, 5 were awarded to study airborne transmission of COVID-19 and 2 grants on transmission of COVID-19 in schools. The average time from the funding opportunity announcement to the award notice date was 151 days (SD: ±57.9). CONCLUSION: In the first year of the pandemic, the NIH diverted a small fraction of its budget to COVID-19 research. Future health emergencies will require research funding to pivot in a timely fashion and funding levels to be proportional to the anticipated burden of disease in the population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90960532022-05-12 NIH funding of COVID-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study Balaguru, Logesvar Dun, Chen Meyer, Andrea Hennayake, Sanuri Walsh, Christi Kung, Christopher Cary, Brittany Migliarese, Frank Dai, Tinglong Bai, Ge Sutcliffe, Kathleen Makary, Martin BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterise and evaluate the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) grant allocation speed and pattern of COVID-19 research. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: COVID-19 NIH RePORTER Dataset was used to identify COVID-19 relevant grants. PARTICIPANTS: 1108 grants allocated to COVID-19 research. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was to determine the number of grants and funding amount the NIH allocated for COVID-19 by research type and clinical/scientific area. The secondary outcome was to calculate the time from the funding opportunity announcement to the award notice date. RESULTS: The NIH awarded a total of 56 169 grants in 2020, of which 2.0% (n=1108) wwas allocated for COVID-19 research. The NIH had a US$45.3 billion budget that year, of which 4.9% (US$2.2 billion) was allocated to COVID-19 research. The most common clinical/scientific areas were social determinants of health (n=278, 8.5% of COVID-19 funding), immunology (n=211, 25.8%) and pharmaceutical interventions research (n=208, 47.6%). There were 104 grants studying COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions, of which 2 grants studied the efficacy of face masks and 6 studied the efficacy of social distancing. Of the 83 COVID-19 funded grants on transmission, 5 were awarded to study airborne transmission of COVID-19 and 2 grants on transmission of COVID-19 in schools. The average time from the funding opportunity announcement to the award notice date was 151 days (SD: ±57.9). CONCLUSION: In the first year of the pandemic, the NIH diverted a small fraction of its budget to COVID-19 research. Future health emergencies will require research funding to pivot in a timely fashion and funding levels to be proportional to the anticipated burden of disease in the population. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9096053/ /pubmed/35545399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059041 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Policy
Balaguru, Logesvar
Dun, Chen
Meyer, Andrea
Hennayake, Sanuri
Walsh, Christi
Kung, Christopher
Cary, Brittany
Migliarese, Frank
Dai, Tinglong
Bai, Ge
Sutcliffe, Kathleen
Makary, Martin
NIH funding of COVID-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study
title NIH funding of COVID-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study
title_full NIH funding of COVID-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr NIH funding of COVID-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed NIH funding of COVID-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study
title_short NIH funding of COVID-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study
title_sort nih funding of covid-19 research in 2020: a cross-sectional study
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059041
work_keys_str_mv AT balagurulogesvar nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT dunchen nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT meyerandrea nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT hennayakesanuri nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT walshchristi nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT kungchristopher nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT carybrittany nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT migliaresefrank nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT daitinglong nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT baige nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT sutcliffekathleen nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy
AT makarymartin nihfundingofcovid19researchin2020acrosssectionalstudy