Cargando…
Statistical significance and its critics: practicing damaging science, or damaging scientific practice?
While the common procedure of statistical significance testing and its accompanying concept of p-values have long been surrounded by controversy, renewed concern has been triggered by the replication crisis in science. Many blame statistical significance tests themselves, and some regard them as suf...
Autores principales: | Mayo, Deborah G., Hand, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03692-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The development of the Religious Health Interventions in Behavioural Science (RHIBS) Taxonomy: a scientific classification of religious practices in health
por: Patel, Riya, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Scientific Discoveries Supporting Theories in Science: From Thinking to Practice
por: Fais, Stefano
Publicado: (2022) -
Determining clinical significance independently from statistical significance? Implications for practice
por: Schreiber, S, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Hyperoxic damage and the need for optimised oxygenation practices
por: Hayes, Rylan A, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Optimized clinical practice for superaged patients with hip fracture: significance of damage control and enhanced recovery program
por: Liu, Zaiyang, et al.
Publicado: (2019)