Cargando…

The prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND: We examined the predictive value of mismatch repair (MMR) status in relation to responses to neoadjuvant therapy and the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 854 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with MMR status who underwent ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zehua, Hu, Huabin, Wang, Chao, Zhang, Jianwei, Cai, Yue, Xie, Xiaoyu, Huang, Yan, Deng, Yanhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571401
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-124
_version_ 1784705962797432832
author Wu, Zehua
Hu, Huabin
Wang, Chao
Zhang, Jianwei
Cai, Yue
Xie, Xiaoyu
Huang, Yan
Deng, Yanhong
author_facet Wu, Zehua
Hu, Huabin
Wang, Chao
Zhang, Jianwei
Cai, Yue
Xie, Xiaoyu
Huang, Yan
Deng, Yanhong
author_sort Wu, Zehua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We examined the predictive value of mismatch repair (MMR) status in relation to responses to neoadjuvant therapy and the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 854 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with MMR status who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative surgery between January 2013 and December 2018 were included this retrospective study. MMR status was determined by an analysis of MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce imbalances in baseline characteristics. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Deficient MMR (dMMR) was detected in 63 of the 854 (7.4%) patients. Patients with dMMR had a lower proportion of tumor regression grade (TRG) of 0–1 compared with proficient MMR (pMMR) (28.6% vs. 43.7%; P=0.027). After propensity score matching at 1:4 for patients who received chemotherapy alone, proportion of TRG of 0–1 was observed to be significantly lower in dMMR than pMMR patients (9.1 vs. 30.3%%; P=0.013). For patients who received chemoradiation, after matching, no significant difference in the proportion of TRG 0–1 and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was observed. The multivariable analysis revealed that patients whose tumors had dMMR had significantly longer DFS than those whose tumors had pMMR [hazards ratio (HR) =0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18–0.81, P=0.013]. In the subgroup analysis, dMMR was only a statistically significant prognostic factor for DFS in patients with ypStage II/III (HR =0.38, 95% CI: 0.17–0.86; P=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with dMMR responded worse to chemotherapy alone than patients with pMMR, in terms of TRG. Also, dMMR is a good prognostic marker for DFS in patients with ypStage II/III after neoadjuvant therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90963712022-05-13 The prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy Wu, Zehua Hu, Huabin Wang, Chao Zhang, Jianwei Cai, Yue Xie, Xiaoyu Huang, Yan Deng, Yanhong Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: We examined the predictive value of mismatch repair (MMR) status in relation to responses to neoadjuvant therapy and the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 854 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with MMR status who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative surgery between January 2013 and December 2018 were included this retrospective study. MMR status was determined by an analysis of MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce imbalances in baseline characteristics. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Deficient MMR (dMMR) was detected in 63 of the 854 (7.4%) patients. Patients with dMMR had a lower proportion of tumor regression grade (TRG) of 0–1 compared with proficient MMR (pMMR) (28.6% vs. 43.7%; P=0.027). After propensity score matching at 1:4 for patients who received chemotherapy alone, proportion of TRG of 0–1 was observed to be significantly lower in dMMR than pMMR patients (9.1 vs. 30.3%%; P=0.013). For patients who received chemoradiation, after matching, no significant difference in the proportion of TRG 0–1 and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was observed. The multivariable analysis revealed that patients whose tumors had dMMR had significantly longer DFS than those whose tumors had pMMR [hazards ratio (HR) =0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18–0.81, P=0.013]. In the subgroup analysis, dMMR was only a statistically significant prognostic factor for DFS in patients with ypStage II/III (HR =0.38, 95% CI: 0.17–0.86; P=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with dMMR responded worse to chemotherapy alone than patients with pMMR, in terms of TRG. Also, dMMR is a good prognostic marker for DFS in patients with ypStage II/III after neoadjuvant therapy. AME Publishing Company 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9096371/ /pubmed/35571401 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-124 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wu, Zehua
Hu, Huabin
Wang, Chao
Zhang, Jianwei
Cai, Yue
Xie, Xiaoyu
Huang, Yan
Deng, Yanhong
The prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy
title The prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy
title_full The prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy
title_fullStr The prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy
title_short The prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy
title_sort prognostic and predictive value of mismatch repair status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571401
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-124
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzehua theprognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT huhuabin theprognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wangchao theprognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT zhangjianwei theprognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT caiyue theprognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT xiexiaoyu theprognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT huangyan theprognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT dengyanhong theprognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wuzehua prognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT huhuabin prognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT wangchao prognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT zhangjianwei prognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT caiyue prognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT xiexiaoyu prognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT huangyan prognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy
AT dengyanhong prognosticandpredictivevalueofmismatchrepairstatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvanttherapy