The diagnostic value of diffusion kurtosis imaging in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Under the background that diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) has become a research hotspot of central nervous system diseases, there are no studies with large sample size evaluating the value of DKI in diagnosing Parkinson’s disease (PD). Moreover, the diagnostic efficacy of DKI in PD is not consistent. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to use the method of meta-analysis, to summarize and evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of DKI in the identification of PD, and to explore the value of its clinical application. METHODS: We use PICOS principles for project design. The included patients were PD patients, and the control group were healthy volunteers. We hope to use DKI to make a differential diagnosis between the two, and this study is a diagnostic test. We performed a literature search of English (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, etc.) and Chinese (China knowledge Network, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service platform, China Science and Technology Journal Database, China Biomedical Literature Service system) databases for related literatures on the efficacy of DKI in the differential diagnosis of PD published before March 29, 2022. We used Revman 5.3 software to assess the quality of the literature, Meta-Disc 1.4 software for summarizing sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), diagnostic odds ratios, and heterogeneity tests, and for subgrouping, and Stata 16.0 software for publication bias analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen articles were included through the literature search. The 14 studies included 535 patients with PD and 486 patients without PD. Most of the included literature had good clinical applicability and relatively low risk. By merging statistics, the results obtained were as follows: Sen =0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74–0.81], Spe =0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8870. DISCUSSION: The results of the meta-analysis showed that magnetic resonance DKI has comparable diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of PD. However, this study also has limitations, and the use of different diagnostic gold standards in the included studies may have some impact on the case selection in the study.