Cargando…

Intraoperative salvaging of failure to harvest the bi-paddle anterolateral thigh flap: a case series

BACKGROUND: The size and versatility of anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap enables a bi-paddle flap to cover complex and extensive defects optimally. However, it is characterized by variations in the sources of blood vessels and in the number of perforators, which increases the chances of failure of har...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Xi, Mo, Wenqian, Xu, Yongqing, Liu, Wuhua, Shi, Yan, Fang, Xiang, Xu, Yujian, He, Xiaoqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571437
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-1118
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The size and versatility of anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap enables a bi-paddle flap to cover complex and extensive defects optimally. However, it is characterized by variations in the sources of blood vessels and in the number of perforators, which increases the chances of failure of harvesting a bi-paddle flap. We present our method to overcome such failure. This is the first study exploring the optimal salvaging algorithm to overcome harvesting failure with the bi-paddle ALT flap. METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2020, in 9 patients to be treated with bi-paddle ALT flap for soft-tissue defects (range, 48–288 cm(2)), there was failure of flap harvest because of perforator variations. We redesigned and converted the flaps to other forms for harvest intraoperatively, based on the characteristics of the defect, and the number and sources of perforators. RESULTS: Salvage of flap harvest was successfully performed in all 9 cases. In 4 cases the flap with a single perforator was converted to widened-single-perforator flaps; in 2 cases, a single perforator was converted to a de-epithelialized flap; in 2 cases of 2 perforators from different main branches, conversion was to sequential chimeric flaps; in the remaining case of 2 perforators from the descending branch and transverse branch, conversion was to a combined transverse-and-descending branches flap. Venous compromise occurred in only 1 case, and the patient survived after revised surgery. Local infection in the receiving area occurred in 3 cases, and was cured by wound dressing. All flaps survived (follow-up 5–24 months). CONCLUSIONS: Despite preoperative preparation, anatomic variations resulted in failure of bi-paddle ALT flap harvesting. As shown by our results, it is feasible to redesign and convert the bi-paddle flap to other forms based on the defect characteristics, and the number and sources of perforators.