Cargando…
The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a potential surgical efficacy assessment in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging data of 16 non-prolapsed (control group) and 30 preoperative and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571410 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-1173 |
_version_ | 1784705974906388480 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Haifeng Shen, Jihong Li, Song Gao, Zhenhua Ke, Kunbin Gu, Peng |
author_facet | Wang, Haifeng Shen, Jihong Li, Song Gao, Zhenhua Ke, Kunbin Gu, Peng |
author_sort | Wang, Haifeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a potential surgical efficacy assessment in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging data of 16 non-prolapsed (control group) and 30 preoperative and postoperative POP (case group) women from 2019 to 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. MRI diagnoses and measures of the relevant anatomical points at rest were used to analyze the healthy control data and the data from POP women before and after surgery. RESULTS: The middle vaginal-PICS line angle (78.12°±15.03° vs. 69.35°±11.51°, 78.12°±15.03° vs. 61.56°±9.58°, P<0.05) and the middle-lower vaginal angle (179.30°±12.96° vs. 161.73°±10.42°, 179.30°±12.96° vs. 147.01°±12.20°, P<0.05) in the preoperative group were significantly larger than those in the control and postoperative groups. Y-axis coordinates of the endocervical orifice (−52.39±15.63 vs. −59.04±11.49 mm, −52.39±15.63 vs. −65.27±7.25 mm, P<0.05), posterior vaginal fornix (−34.25±13.30 vs. −46.69±11.09 mm, −34.25±13.30 vs. −49.93±8.02 mm, P<0.05), the junction of the middle and lower vagina (−0.48±8.65 vs. −11.34±7.33 mm, −0.48±8.65 vs. −10.11±9.77 mm, P<0.05), and anterior vaginal fornix (−23.14±13.71 vs. −34.68±9.07 mm, −23.14±13.71 vs. −38.64±6.48 mm, P<0.05), as well as the x-axes of the junction of the middle and lower parts of the vagina (26.79±6.71 vs. 19.56±5.24, 26.79±6.71 vs. 17.67±5.81, P<0.05), and vaginal introitus (23.39±7.12 vs. 18.55±4.22, 23.39±7.12 vs. 19.00±4.55, P<0.05) in the preoperative group were smaller than those of the control and postoperative groups. Differences between the control and postoperative groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The current study established that the uterine-vaginal axis of POP women moved backward and downward in the coordinate system, as shown on MRI sagittal images. Further, it moved forward and upwards after surgical repair and more closely resembled that of the control group. The uterine-vaginal axis may provide an evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with POP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9096420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90964202022-05-13 The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse Wang, Haifeng Shen, Jihong Li, Song Gao, Zhenhua Ke, Kunbin Gu, Peng Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a potential surgical efficacy assessment in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging data of 16 non-prolapsed (control group) and 30 preoperative and postoperative POP (case group) women from 2019 to 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. MRI diagnoses and measures of the relevant anatomical points at rest were used to analyze the healthy control data and the data from POP women before and after surgery. RESULTS: The middle vaginal-PICS line angle (78.12°±15.03° vs. 69.35°±11.51°, 78.12°±15.03° vs. 61.56°±9.58°, P<0.05) and the middle-lower vaginal angle (179.30°±12.96° vs. 161.73°±10.42°, 179.30°±12.96° vs. 147.01°±12.20°, P<0.05) in the preoperative group were significantly larger than those in the control and postoperative groups. Y-axis coordinates of the endocervical orifice (−52.39±15.63 vs. −59.04±11.49 mm, −52.39±15.63 vs. −65.27±7.25 mm, P<0.05), posterior vaginal fornix (−34.25±13.30 vs. −46.69±11.09 mm, −34.25±13.30 vs. −49.93±8.02 mm, P<0.05), the junction of the middle and lower vagina (−0.48±8.65 vs. −11.34±7.33 mm, −0.48±8.65 vs. −10.11±9.77 mm, P<0.05), and anterior vaginal fornix (−23.14±13.71 vs. −34.68±9.07 mm, −23.14±13.71 vs. −38.64±6.48 mm, P<0.05), as well as the x-axes of the junction of the middle and lower parts of the vagina (26.79±6.71 vs. 19.56±5.24, 26.79±6.71 vs. 17.67±5.81, P<0.05), and vaginal introitus (23.39±7.12 vs. 18.55±4.22, 23.39±7.12 vs. 19.00±4.55, P<0.05) in the preoperative group were smaller than those of the control and postoperative groups. Differences between the control and postoperative groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The current study established that the uterine-vaginal axis of POP women moved backward and downward in the coordinate system, as shown on MRI sagittal images. Further, it moved forward and upwards after surgical repair and more closely resembled that of the control group. The uterine-vaginal axis may provide an evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with POP. AME Publishing Company 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9096420/ /pubmed/35571410 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-1173 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Haifeng Shen, Jihong Li, Song Gao, Zhenhua Ke, Kunbin Gu, Peng The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse |
title | The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse |
title_full | The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse |
title_fullStr | The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse |
title_full_unstemmed | The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse |
title_short | The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse |
title_sort | feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis mri-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571410 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-1173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghaifeng thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT shenjihong thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT lisong thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT gaozhenhua thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT kekunbin thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT gupeng thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT wanghaifeng feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT shenjihong feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT lisong feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT gaozhenhua feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT kekunbin feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse AT gupeng feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse |