Cargando…

The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a potential surgical efficacy assessment in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging data of 16 non-prolapsed (control group) and 30 preoperative and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Haifeng, Shen, Jihong, Li, Song, Gao, Zhenhua, Ke, Kunbin, Gu, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571410
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-1173
_version_ 1784705974906388480
author Wang, Haifeng
Shen, Jihong
Li, Song
Gao, Zhenhua
Ke, Kunbin
Gu, Peng
author_facet Wang, Haifeng
Shen, Jihong
Li, Song
Gao, Zhenhua
Ke, Kunbin
Gu, Peng
author_sort Wang, Haifeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a potential surgical efficacy assessment in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging data of 16 non-prolapsed (control group) and 30 preoperative and postoperative POP (case group) women from 2019 to 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. MRI diagnoses and measures of the relevant anatomical points at rest were used to analyze the healthy control data and the data from POP women before and after surgery. RESULTS: The middle vaginal-PICS line angle (78.12°±15.03° vs. 69.35°±11.51°, 78.12°±15.03° vs. 61.56°±9.58°, P<0.05) and the middle-lower vaginal angle (179.30°±12.96° vs. 161.73°±10.42°, 179.30°±12.96° vs. 147.01°±12.20°, P<0.05) in the preoperative group were significantly larger than those in the control and postoperative groups. Y-axis coordinates of the endocervical orifice (−52.39±15.63 vs. −59.04±11.49 mm, −52.39±15.63 vs. −65.27±7.25 mm, P<0.05), posterior vaginal fornix (−34.25±13.30 vs. −46.69±11.09 mm, −34.25±13.30 vs. −49.93±8.02 mm, P<0.05), the junction of the middle and lower vagina (−0.48±8.65 vs. −11.34±7.33 mm, −0.48±8.65 vs. −10.11±9.77 mm, P<0.05), and anterior vaginal fornix (−23.14±13.71 vs. −34.68±9.07 mm, −23.14±13.71 vs. −38.64±6.48 mm, P<0.05), as well as the x-axes of the junction of the middle and lower parts of the vagina (26.79±6.71 vs. 19.56±5.24, 26.79±6.71 vs. 17.67±5.81, P<0.05), and vaginal introitus (23.39±7.12 vs. 18.55±4.22, 23.39±7.12 vs. 19.00±4.55, P<0.05) in the preoperative group were smaller than those of the control and postoperative groups. Differences between the control and postoperative groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The current study established that the uterine-vaginal axis of POP women moved backward and downward in the coordinate system, as shown on MRI sagittal images. Further, it moved forward and upwards after surgical repair and more closely resembled that of the control group. The uterine-vaginal axis may provide an evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with POP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90964202022-05-13 The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse Wang, Haifeng Shen, Jihong Li, Song Gao, Zhenhua Ke, Kunbin Gu, Peng Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to provide a potential surgical efficacy assessment in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging data of 16 non-prolapsed (control group) and 30 preoperative and postoperative POP (case group) women from 2019 to 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. MRI diagnoses and measures of the relevant anatomical points at rest were used to analyze the healthy control data and the data from POP women before and after surgery. RESULTS: The middle vaginal-PICS line angle (78.12°±15.03° vs. 69.35°±11.51°, 78.12°±15.03° vs. 61.56°±9.58°, P<0.05) and the middle-lower vaginal angle (179.30°±12.96° vs. 161.73°±10.42°, 179.30°±12.96° vs. 147.01°±12.20°, P<0.05) in the preoperative group were significantly larger than those in the control and postoperative groups. Y-axis coordinates of the endocervical orifice (−52.39±15.63 vs. −59.04±11.49 mm, −52.39±15.63 vs. −65.27±7.25 mm, P<0.05), posterior vaginal fornix (−34.25±13.30 vs. −46.69±11.09 mm, −34.25±13.30 vs. −49.93±8.02 mm, P<0.05), the junction of the middle and lower vagina (−0.48±8.65 vs. −11.34±7.33 mm, −0.48±8.65 vs. −10.11±9.77 mm, P<0.05), and anterior vaginal fornix (−23.14±13.71 vs. −34.68±9.07 mm, −23.14±13.71 vs. −38.64±6.48 mm, P<0.05), as well as the x-axes of the junction of the middle and lower parts of the vagina (26.79±6.71 vs. 19.56±5.24, 26.79±6.71 vs. 17.67±5.81, P<0.05), and vaginal introitus (23.39±7.12 vs. 18.55±4.22, 23.39±7.12 vs. 19.00±4.55, P<0.05) in the preoperative group were smaller than those of the control and postoperative groups. Differences between the control and postoperative groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The current study established that the uterine-vaginal axis of POP women moved backward and downward in the coordinate system, as shown on MRI sagittal images. Further, it moved forward and upwards after surgical repair and more closely resembled that of the control group. The uterine-vaginal axis may provide an evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with POP. AME Publishing Company 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9096420/ /pubmed/35571410 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-1173 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wang, Haifeng
Shen, Jihong
Li, Song
Gao, Zhenhua
Ke, Kunbin
Gu, Peng
The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
title The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
title_full The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
title_fullStr The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
title_short The feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis MRI-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
title_sort feasibility of uterine-vaginal axis mri-based as evaluation of surgical efficacy in women with pelvic organ prolapse
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571410
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-1173
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghaifeng thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT shenjihong thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT lisong thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT gaozhenhua thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT kekunbin thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT gupeng thefeasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT wanghaifeng feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT shenjihong feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT lisong feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT gaozhenhua feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT kekunbin feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse
AT gupeng feasibilityofuterinevaginalaxismribasedasevaluationofsurgicalefficacyinwomenwithpelvicorganprolapse