Cargando…

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the effectiveness and safety of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV. METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials) were searched up to 5 July 202...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O Murchu, Eamon, Marshall, Liam, Teljeur, Conor, Harrington, Patricia, Hayes, Catherine, Moran, Patrick, Ryan, Mairin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048478
_version_ 1784705989302288384
author O Murchu, Eamon
Marshall, Liam
Teljeur, Conor
Harrington, Patricia
Hayes, Catherine
Moran, Patrick
Ryan, Mairin
author_facet O Murchu, Eamon
Marshall, Liam
Teljeur, Conor
Harrington, Patricia
Hayes, Catherine
Moran, Patrick
Ryan, Mairin
author_sort O Murchu, Eamon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the effectiveness and safety of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV. METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials) were searched up to 5 July 2020. Search terms for ‘HIV’ were combined with terms for ‘PrEP’ or ‘tenofovir/emtricitabine’. RCTs were included that compared oral tenofovir-containing PrEP to placebo, no treatment or alternative medication/dosing schedule. The primary outcome was the rate ratio (RR) of HIV infection using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included safety, adherence and risk compensation. All analyses were stratified a priori by population: men who have sex with men (MSM), serodiscordant couples, heterosexuals and people who inject drugs (PWIDs). The quality of individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Of 2803 unique records, 15 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. Over 25 000 participants were included, encompassing 38 289 person-years of follow-up data. PrEP was found to be effective in MSM (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.61; absolute rate difference (RD) −0.03, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.05), serodiscordant couples (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.46; RD −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.02) and PWID (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.92; RD −0.00, 95% CI −0.00 to −0.01), but not in heterosexuals (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.29). Efficacy was strongly associated with adherence (p<0.01). PrEP was found to be safe, but unrecognised HIV at enrolment increased the risk of viral drug resistance mutations. Evidence for behaviour change or an increase in sexually transmitted infections was not found. CONCLUSIONS: PrEP is safe and effective in MSM, serodiscordant couples and PWIDs. Additional research is needed prior to recommending PrEP in heterosexuals. No RCTs reported effectiveness or safety data for other high-risk groups, such as transgender women and sex workers. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065937.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90964922022-05-27 Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations O Murchu, Eamon Marshall, Liam Teljeur, Conor Harrington, Patricia Hayes, Catherine Moran, Patrick Ryan, Mairin BMJ Open HIV/AIDS OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the effectiveness and safety of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV. METHODS: Databases (PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials) were searched up to 5 July 2020. Search terms for ‘HIV’ were combined with terms for ‘PrEP’ or ‘tenofovir/emtricitabine’. RCTs were included that compared oral tenofovir-containing PrEP to placebo, no treatment or alternative medication/dosing schedule. The primary outcome was the rate ratio (RR) of HIV infection using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included safety, adherence and risk compensation. All analyses were stratified a priori by population: men who have sex with men (MSM), serodiscordant couples, heterosexuals and people who inject drugs (PWIDs). The quality of individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Of 2803 unique records, 15 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. Over 25 000 participants were included, encompassing 38 289 person-years of follow-up data. PrEP was found to be effective in MSM (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.61; absolute rate difference (RD) −0.03, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.05), serodiscordant couples (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.46; RD −0.01, 95% CI −0.01 to −0.02) and PWID (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.92; RD −0.00, 95% CI −0.00 to −0.01), but not in heterosexuals (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.29). Efficacy was strongly associated with adherence (p<0.01). PrEP was found to be safe, but unrecognised HIV at enrolment increased the risk of viral drug resistance mutations. Evidence for behaviour change or an increase in sexually transmitted infections was not found. CONCLUSIONS: PrEP is safe and effective in MSM, serodiscordant couples and PWIDs. Additional research is needed prior to recommending PrEP in heterosexuals. No RCTs reported effectiveness or safety data for other high-risk groups, such as transgender women and sex workers. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065937. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9096492/ /pubmed/35545381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048478 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS
O Murchu, Eamon
Marshall, Liam
Teljeur, Conor
Harrington, Patricia
Hayes, Catherine
Moran, Patrick
Ryan, Mairin
Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations
title Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations
title_full Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations
title_fullStr Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations
title_full_unstemmed Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations
title_short Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations
title_sort oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) to prevent hiv: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations
topic HIV/AIDS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048478
work_keys_str_mv AT omurchueamon oralpreexposureprophylaxispreptopreventhivasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaleffectivenesssafetyadherenceandriskcompensationinallpopulations
AT marshallliam oralpreexposureprophylaxispreptopreventhivasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaleffectivenesssafetyadherenceandriskcompensationinallpopulations
AT teljeurconor oralpreexposureprophylaxispreptopreventhivasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaleffectivenesssafetyadherenceandriskcompensationinallpopulations
AT harringtonpatricia oralpreexposureprophylaxispreptopreventhivasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaleffectivenesssafetyadherenceandriskcompensationinallpopulations
AT hayescatherine oralpreexposureprophylaxispreptopreventhivasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaleffectivenesssafetyadherenceandriskcompensationinallpopulations
AT moranpatrick oralpreexposureprophylaxispreptopreventhivasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaleffectivenesssafetyadherenceandriskcompensationinallpopulations
AT ryanmairin oralpreexposureprophylaxispreptopreventhivasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofclinicaleffectivenesssafetyadherenceandriskcompensationinallpopulations