Cargando…
Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis”
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two rituximab (RTX) regimens for the induction of remission in severe antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody‐associated vasculitis (AAV): the four‐dose (375 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly) versus the two‐dose (1000 mg intraven...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11409 |
_version_ | 1784705993761882112 |
---|---|
author | Elfishawi, Mohanad |
author_facet | Elfishawi, Mohanad |
author_sort | Elfishawi, Mohanad |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two rituximab (RTX) regimens for the induction of remission in severe antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody‐associated vasculitis (AAV): the four‐dose (375 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly) versus the two‐dose (1000 mg intravenously biweekly) regimen. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify studies using the four‐ and/or two‐dose RTX regimens for induction of remission in severe AAV. Disease status 6 months after RTX infusion was required for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received concomitant cyclophosphamide or plasma exchange. The primary end point was the proportion of patients in complete remission at 6 months. The pooled estimate was obtained by using meta‐analysis methods for proportions with random effects. Secondary end points included antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody status, number of patients with B‐cell depletion, mean prednisone dose, infections, and death. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies and 506 patients were included for analysis: 361 patients received the four‐dose regimen, and 145 patients received the two‐dose regimen. Most patients had relapsing disease at inclusion (83% and 92% of patients, respectively). There was no significant difference between the four‐ and two‐dose regimens, with a complete remission achieved in 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70‐96) and 91% (95% CI: 79‐99) of patients, respectively. At 6 months, both regimens were associated with a similar mean daily prednisone dose (8.1 mg), infections (12% in both), and death (1% vs. 0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: No difference was found in terms of efficacy or safety between the four‐ and two‐dose RTX regimens for induction of remission in severe AAV. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr2.11274 Bénard V, Farhat C, Zarandi‐Nowroozi M, Durand M, Charles P, Puéchal X, et al. Comparison of two rituximab induction regimens for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody–associated vasculitis: systematic review and meta‐analysis. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021;3:484–94. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9096519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90965192022-05-18 Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis” Elfishawi, Mohanad ACR Open Rheumatol Journal Club OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two rituximab (RTX) regimens for the induction of remission in severe antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody‐associated vasculitis (AAV): the four‐dose (375 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly) versus the two‐dose (1000 mg intravenously biweekly) regimen. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify studies using the four‐ and/or two‐dose RTX regimens for induction of remission in severe AAV. Disease status 6 months after RTX infusion was required for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received concomitant cyclophosphamide or plasma exchange. The primary end point was the proportion of patients in complete remission at 6 months. The pooled estimate was obtained by using meta‐analysis methods for proportions with random effects. Secondary end points included antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody status, number of patients with B‐cell depletion, mean prednisone dose, infections, and death. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies and 506 patients were included for analysis: 361 patients received the four‐dose regimen, and 145 patients received the two‐dose regimen. Most patients had relapsing disease at inclusion (83% and 92% of patients, respectively). There was no significant difference between the four‐ and two‐dose regimens, with a complete remission achieved in 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70‐96) and 91% (95% CI: 79‐99) of patients, respectively. At 6 months, both regimens were associated with a similar mean daily prednisone dose (8.1 mg), infections (12% in both), and death (1% vs. 0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: No difference was found in terms of efficacy or safety between the four‐ and two‐dose RTX regimens for induction of remission in severe AAV. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr2.11274 Bénard V, Farhat C, Zarandi‐Nowroozi M, Durand M, Charles P, Puéchal X, et al. Comparison of two rituximab induction regimens for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody–associated vasculitis: systematic review and meta‐analysis. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021;3:484–94. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9096519/ /pubmed/35119219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11409 Text en © 2022 The Author. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Journal Club Elfishawi, Mohanad Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis” |
title | Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis” |
title_full | Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis” |
title_fullStr | Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis” |
title_full_unstemmed | Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis” |
title_short | Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis” |
title_sort | journal club review of “comparison of two rituximab induction regimens for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody–associated vasculitis: systematic review and meta‐analysis” |
topic | Journal Club |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11409 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elfishawimohanad journalclubreviewofcomparisonoftworituximabinductionregimensforantineutrophilcytoplasmantibodyassociatedvasculitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |