Cargando…

Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis”

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two rituximab (RTX) regimens for the induction of remission in severe antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody‐associated vasculitis (AAV): the four‐dose (375 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly) versus the two‐dose (1000 mg intraven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Elfishawi, Mohanad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11409
_version_ 1784705993761882112
author Elfishawi, Mohanad
author_facet Elfishawi, Mohanad
author_sort Elfishawi, Mohanad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two rituximab (RTX) regimens for the induction of remission in severe antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody‐associated vasculitis (AAV): the four‐dose (375 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly) versus the two‐dose (1000 mg intravenously biweekly) regimen. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify studies using the four‐ and/or two‐dose RTX regimens for induction of remission in severe AAV. Disease status 6 months after RTX infusion was required for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received concomitant cyclophosphamide or plasma exchange. The primary end point was the proportion of patients in complete remission at 6 months. The pooled estimate was obtained by using meta‐analysis methods for proportions with random effects. Secondary end points included antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody status, number of patients with B‐cell depletion, mean prednisone dose, infections, and death. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies and 506 patients were included for analysis: 361 patients received the four‐dose regimen, and 145 patients received the two‐dose regimen. Most patients had relapsing disease at inclusion (83% and 92% of patients, respectively). There was no significant difference between the four‐ and two‐dose regimens, with a complete remission achieved in 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70‐96) and 91% (95% CI: 79‐99) of patients, respectively. At 6 months, both regimens were associated with a similar mean daily prednisone dose (8.1 mg), infections (12% in both), and death (1% vs. 0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: No difference was found in terms of efficacy or safety between the four‐ and two‐dose RTX regimens for induction of remission in severe AAV. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr2.11274 Bénard V, Farhat C, Zarandi‐Nowroozi M, Durand M, Charles P, Puéchal X, et al. Comparison of two rituximab induction regimens for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody–associated vasculitis: systematic review and meta‐analysis. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021;3:484–94.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90965192022-05-18 Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis” Elfishawi, Mohanad ACR Open Rheumatol Journal Club OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two rituximab (RTX) regimens for the induction of remission in severe antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody‐associated vasculitis (AAV): the four‐dose (375 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly) versus the two‐dose (1000 mg intravenously biweekly) regimen. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify studies using the four‐ and/or two‐dose RTX regimens for induction of remission in severe AAV. Disease status 6 months after RTX infusion was required for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they received concomitant cyclophosphamide or plasma exchange. The primary end point was the proportion of patients in complete remission at 6 months. The pooled estimate was obtained by using meta‐analysis methods for proportions with random effects. Secondary end points included antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody status, number of patients with B‐cell depletion, mean prednisone dose, infections, and death. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies and 506 patients were included for analysis: 361 patients received the four‐dose regimen, and 145 patients received the two‐dose regimen. Most patients had relapsing disease at inclusion (83% and 92% of patients, respectively). There was no significant difference between the four‐ and two‐dose regimens, with a complete remission achieved in 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70‐96) and 91% (95% CI: 79‐99) of patients, respectively. At 6 months, both regimens were associated with a similar mean daily prednisone dose (8.1 mg), infections (12% in both), and death (1% vs. 0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: No difference was found in terms of efficacy or safety between the four‐ and two‐dose RTX regimens for induction of remission in severe AAV. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr2.11274 Bénard V, Farhat C, Zarandi‐Nowroozi M, Durand M, Charles P, Puéchal X, et al. Comparison of two rituximab induction regimens for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody–associated vasculitis: systematic review and meta‐analysis. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021;3:484–94. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9096519/ /pubmed/35119219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11409 Text en © 2022 The Author. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Journal Club
Elfishawi, Mohanad
Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis”
title Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis”
title_full Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis”
title_fullStr Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis”
title_full_unstemmed Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis”
title_short Journal Club Review of “Comparison of Two Rituximab Induction Regimens for Antineutrophil Cytoplasm Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis”
title_sort journal club review of “comparison of two rituximab induction regimens for antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody–associated vasculitis: systematic review and meta‐analysis”
topic Journal Club
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35119219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11409
work_keys_str_mv AT elfishawimohanad journalclubreviewofcomparisonoftworituximabinductionregimensforantineutrophilcytoplasmantibodyassociatedvasculitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis