Cargando…

Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of pre-anaesthesia assessment clinics (PACs) in improving the quality and safety of perioperative patient care. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: The electronic databases CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kristoffersen, Eirunn Wallevik, Opsal, Anne, Tveit, Tor Oddbjørn, Berg, Rigmor C, Fossum, Mariann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054206
_version_ 1784705998424899584
author Kristoffersen, Eirunn Wallevik
Opsal, Anne
Tveit, Tor Oddbjørn
Berg, Rigmor C
Fossum, Mariann
author_facet Kristoffersen, Eirunn Wallevik
Opsal, Anne
Tveit, Tor Oddbjørn
Berg, Rigmor C
Fossum, Mariann
author_sort Kristoffersen, Eirunn Wallevik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of pre-anaesthesia assessment clinics (PACs) in improving the quality and safety of perioperative patient care. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: The electronic databases CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Medline and Embase (OvidSP) were systematically searched on 11 September 2018 and updated on 3 February 2020 and 4 February 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria for this study were studies published in English or Scandinavian language and scientific original research that included randomised or non-randomised prospective controlled studies. Additionally, studies that reported the outcomes from a PAC consultation with the patient present were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened by a team of three authors. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for quasi-experimental studies. Data extraction was performed by one author and checked by four other authors. Results were synthesised narratively owing to the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: Seven prospective controlled studies on the effectiveness of PACs were included. Three studies reported a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay and two studies reported a significant reduction in cancellation of surgery for medical reasons when patients were seen in the PAC. In addition, the included studies presented mixed results regarding anxiety in patients. Most studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated a reduction in the length of hospital stay and cancellation of surgery when the patients had been assessed in the PAC. There is a need for high-quality prospective studies to gain a deeper understanding of the effectiveness of PACs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019137724.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90965382022-05-18 Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies Kristoffersen, Eirunn Wallevik Opsal, Anne Tveit, Tor Oddbjørn Berg, Rigmor C Fossum, Mariann BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of pre-anaesthesia assessment clinics (PACs) in improving the quality and safety of perioperative patient care. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: The electronic databases CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Medline and Embase (OvidSP) were systematically searched on 11 September 2018 and updated on 3 February 2020 and 4 February 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria for this study were studies published in English or Scandinavian language and scientific original research that included randomised or non-randomised prospective controlled studies. Additionally, studies that reported the outcomes from a PAC consultation with the patient present were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened by a team of three authors. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for quasi-experimental studies. Data extraction was performed by one author and checked by four other authors. Results were synthesised narratively owing to the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: Seven prospective controlled studies on the effectiveness of PACs were included. Three studies reported a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay and two studies reported a significant reduction in cancellation of surgery for medical reasons when patients were seen in the PAC. In addition, the included studies presented mixed results regarding anxiety in patients. Most studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated a reduction in the length of hospital stay and cancellation of surgery when the patients had been assessed in the PAC. There is a need for high-quality prospective studies to gain a deeper understanding of the effectiveness of PACs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019137724. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9096538/ /pubmed/35545393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054206 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Kristoffersen, Eirunn Wallevik
Opsal, Anne
Tveit, Tor Oddbjørn
Berg, Rigmor C
Fossum, Mariann
Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies
title Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies
title_full Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies
title_fullStr Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies
title_short Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies
title_sort effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35545393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054206
work_keys_str_mv AT kristofferseneirunnwallevik effectivenessofpreanaestheticassessmentclinicasystematicreviewofrandomisedandnonrandomisedprospectivecontrolledstudies
AT opsalanne effectivenessofpreanaestheticassessmentclinicasystematicreviewofrandomisedandnonrandomisedprospectivecontrolledstudies
AT tveittoroddbjørn effectivenessofpreanaestheticassessmentclinicasystematicreviewofrandomisedandnonrandomisedprospectivecontrolledstudies
AT bergrigmorc effectivenessofpreanaestheticassessmentclinicasystematicreviewofrandomisedandnonrandomisedprospectivecontrolledstudies
AT fossummariann effectivenessofpreanaestheticassessmentclinicasystematicreviewofrandomisedandnonrandomisedprospectivecontrolledstudies