Cargando…

Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

INTRODUCTION: The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system has been a topic of discussion. Early results were promising but did not deliver on the long-term and the device has been recalled from the market. This study compares literature for EVAS and conventional endovascular aneurysm repa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zoethout, Aleksandra C, Hochstenbach, Iris, van der Laan, Maarten J, de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M, Reijnen, Michel M.P.J., Zeebregts, Clark J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028211047941
_version_ 1784706011700920320
author Zoethout, Aleksandra C
Hochstenbach, Iris
van der Laan, Maarten J
de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M
Reijnen, Michel M.P.J.
Zeebregts, Clark J
author_facet Zoethout, Aleksandra C
Hochstenbach, Iris
van der Laan, Maarten J
de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M
Reijnen, Michel M.P.J.
Zeebregts, Clark J
author_sort Zoethout, Aleksandra C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system has been a topic of discussion. Early results were promising but did not deliver on the long-term and the device has been recalled from the market. This study compares literature for EVAS and conventional endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A systematic review and analysis was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched and identified the eligible studies. Proportion rates for the outcomes of interest were extracted. Subgroup analyses were performed for EVAS and EVAR. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included (EVAS n = 4, EVAR n = 8) including 10,255 patients (EVAS n = 784, EVAR n = 9441). The longest duration of follow-up was 3.4 years for EVAS and 5.0 years for EVAR studies. Throughout follow-up the overall all-cause mortality rates were 6% for EVAS and 13% for EVAR, and endoleak of any type was described in 10% of EVAS and 17% of EVAR patients. The migration rate >10 mm was 8% for EVAS and 0% for EVAR and aneurysm growth >5 mm was found in 11% of EVAS and 3% of EVAR cases. Total reintervention rate was 13% for EVAS and 7% for EVAR patients. For all analyzed outcome parameters heterogeneity was >50%. CONCLUSION: There is a tendency toward lower mortality and overall endoleak rates for EVAS compared to EVAR but with a higher rate of migration, aneurysm growth, and reintervention. Despite lower overall endoleak rates there was a tendency toward less type II and more type I endoleaks after EVAS compared to EVAR. Substantial heterogeneity however limits robust statistical analyses, and is probably caused by significant instructions for use breach in EVAS-treated patients. We call for more high-quality and long-term follow-up studies on both EVAS and EVAR in order to confirm the trends found in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90965912022-05-13 Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Zoethout, Aleksandra C Hochstenbach, Iris van der Laan, Maarten J de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M Reijnen, Michel M.P.J. Zeebregts, Clark J J Endovasc Ther Reviews INTRODUCTION: The Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system has been a topic of discussion. Early results were promising but did not deliver on the long-term and the device has been recalled from the market. This study compares literature for EVAS and conventional endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A systematic review and analysis was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched and identified the eligible studies. Proportion rates for the outcomes of interest were extracted. Subgroup analyses were performed for EVAS and EVAR. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included (EVAS n = 4, EVAR n = 8) including 10,255 patients (EVAS n = 784, EVAR n = 9441). The longest duration of follow-up was 3.4 years for EVAS and 5.0 years for EVAR studies. Throughout follow-up the overall all-cause mortality rates were 6% for EVAS and 13% for EVAR, and endoleak of any type was described in 10% of EVAS and 17% of EVAR patients. The migration rate >10 mm was 8% for EVAS and 0% for EVAR and aneurysm growth >5 mm was found in 11% of EVAS and 3% of EVAR cases. Total reintervention rate was 13% for EVAS and 7% for EVAR patients. For all analyzed outcome parameters heterogeneity was >50%. CONCLUSION: There is a tendency toward lower mortality and overall endoleak rates for EVAS compared to EVAR but with a higher rate of migration, aneurysm growth, and reintervention. Despite lower overall endoleak rates there was a tendency toward less type II and more type I endoleaks after EVAS compared to EVAR. Substantial heterogeneity however limits robust statistical analyses, and is probably caused by significant instructions for use breach in EVAS-treated patients. We call for more high-quality and long-term follow-up studies on both EVAS and EVAR in order to confirm the trends found in this study. SAGE Publications 2021-09-27 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9096591/ /pubmed/34569337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028211047941 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Reviews
Zoethout, Aleksandra C
Hochstenbach, Iris
van der Laan, Maarten J
de Vries, Jean-Paul P.M
Reijnen, Michel M.P.J.
Zeebregts, Clark J
Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_full Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_fullStr Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_short Systematic Review on the Mid-Term Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in Comparison to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_sort systematic review on the mid-term outcomes of elective endovascular aneurysm sealing in comparison to endovascular aneurysm repair
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34569337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028211047941
work_keys_str_mv AT zoethoutaleksandrac systematicreviewonthemidtermoutcomesofelectiveendovascularaneurysmsealingincomparisontoendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT hochstenbachiris systematicreviewonthemidtermoutcomesofelectiveendovascularaneurysmsealingincomparisontoendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT vanderlaanmaartenj systematicreviewonthemidtermoutcomesofelectiveendovascularaneurysmsealingincomparisontoendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT devriesjeanpaulpm systematicreviewonthemidtermoutcomesofelectiveendovascularaneurysmsealingincomparisontoendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT reijnenmichelmpj systematicreviewonthemidtermoutcomesofelectiveendovascularaneurysmsealingincomparisontoendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT zeebregtsclarkj systematicreviewonthemidtermoutcomesofelectiveendovascularaneurysmsealingincomparisontoendovascularaneurysmrepair