Cargando…

Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations

Brain size and IQ are positively correlated. However, multiple meta-analyses have led to considerable differences in summary effect estimations, thus failing to provide a plausible effect estimate. Here we aim at resolving this issue by providing the largest meta-analysis and systematic review so fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pietschnig, Jakob, Gerdesmann, Daniel, Zeiler, Michael, Voracek, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211621
_version_ 1784706018618376192
author Pietschnig, Jakob
Gerdesmann, Daniel
Zeiler, Michael
Voracek, Martin
author_facet Pietschnig, Jakob
Gerdesmann, Daniel
Zeiler, Michael
Voracek, Martin
author_sort Pietschnig, Jakob
collection PubMed
description Brain size and IQ are positively correlated. However, multiple meta-analyses have led to considerable differences in summary effect estimations, thus failing to provide a plausible effect estimate. Here we aim at resolving this issue by providing the largest meta-analysis and systematic review so far of the brain volume and IQ association (86 studies; 454 effect sizes from k = 194 independent samples; N = 26 000+) in three cognitive ability domains (full-scale, verbal, performance IQ). By means of competing meta-analytical approaches as well as combinatorial and specification curve analyses, we show that most reasonable estimates for the brain size and IQ link yield r-values in the mid-0.20s, with the most extreme specifications yielding rs of 0.10 and 0.37. Summary effects appeared to be somewhat inflated due to selective reporting, and cross-temporally decreasing effect sizes indicated a confounding decline effect, with three quarters of the summary effect estimations according to any reasonable specification not exceeding r = 0.26, thus contrasting effect sizes were observed in some prior related, but individual, meta-analytical specifications. Brain size and IQ associations yielded r = 0.24, with the strongest effects observed for more g-loaded tests and in healthy samples that generalize across participant sex and age bands.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90966232022-05-14 Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations Pietschnig, Jakob Gerdesmann, Daniel Zeiler, Michael Voracek, Martin R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Brain size and IQ are positively correlated. However, multiple meta-analyses have led to considerable differences in summary effect estimations, thus failing to provide a plausible effect estimate. Here we aim at resolving this issue by providing the largest meta-analysis and systematic review so far of the brain volume and IQ association (86 studies; 454 effect sizes from k = 194 independent samples; N = 26 000+) in three cognitive ability domains (full-scale, verbal, performance IQ). By means of competing meta-analytical approaches as well as combinatorial and specification curve analyses, we show that most reasonable estimates for the brain size and IQ link yield r-values in the mid-0.20s, with the most extreme specifications yielding rs of 0.10 and 0.37. Summary effects appeared to be somewhat inflated due to selective reporting, and cross-temporally decreasing effect sizes indicated a confounding decline effect, with three quarters of the summary effect estimations according to any reasonable specification not exceeding r = 0.26, thus contrasting effect sizes were observed in some prior related, but individual, meta-analytical specifications. Brain size and IQ associations yielded r = 0.24, with the strongest effects observed for more g-loaded tests and in healthy samples that generalize across participant sex and age bands. The Royal Society 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9096623/ /pubmed/35573038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211621 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Pietschnig, Jakob
Gerdesmann, Daniel
Zeiler, Michael
Voracek, Martin
Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations
title Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations
title_full Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations
title_fullStr Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations
title_full_unstemmed Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations
title_short Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations
title_sort of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and iq associations
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211621
work_keys_str_mv AT pietschnigjakob ofdifferingmethodsdisputedestimatesanddiscordantinterpretationsthemetaanalyticalmultiverseofbrainvolumeandiqassociations
AT gerdesmanndaniel ofdifferingmethodsdisputedestimatesanddiscordantinterpretationsthemetaanalyticalmultiverseofbrainvolumeandiqassociations
AT zeilermichael ofdifferingmethodsdisputedestimatesanddiscordantinterpretationsthemetaanalyticalmultiverseofbrainvolumeandiqassociations
AT voracekmartin ofdifferingmethodsdisputedestimatesanddiscordantinterpretationsthemetaanalyticalmultiverseofbrainvolumeandiqassociations