Cargando…
Structuring knowledge-building in online design education
Design education has traditionally been deemed a face-to-face endeavor causing online learning to be disregarded as a viable teaching option. Nonetheless, the recent impact of COVID-19 pressured design schools to rapidly migrate online, impelling many educators to utilize this unfamiliar and largely...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09756-z |
_version_ | 1784706043898494976 |
---|---|
author | Güler, Kutay |
author_facet | Güler, Kutay |
author_sort | Güler, Kutay |
collection | PubMed |
description | Design education has traditionally been deemed a face-to-face endeavor causing online learning to be disregarded as a viable teaching option. Nonetheless, the recent impact of COVID-19 pressured design schools to rapidly migrate online, impelling many educators to utilize this unfamiliar and largely dismissed methodology. The impending problems exposed with this sudden shift point to a significant gap in research. Accordingly, this study proposes a set of guidelines targeting design knowledge-building, based on an in-depth look at student experience during an online design course. Data were collected through a 63-item course efficiency survey (n = 59) and a series of semi-structured focus group interviews (n = 16) with the enrolled students. The following overarching themes emerged through iterative thematic analysis of the interview data: (1) flexibility and handling stress, (2) managing self-pacing issues (3) formal conversation platform, (4) content variety and access options. The themes were interpreted in relation to the survey findings and the broader research on learning. The proposed guidelines emphasize initially clear goals and objectives, pacing flexibility with progress guidance, content and communication variety, sense of presence and peer exposure, and individualized feedback. It is expected that the guidelines will be helpful in building, conducting, and evaluating future online design knowledge-building experiences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9096742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90967422022-05-12 Structuring knowledge-building in online design education Güler, Kutay Int J Technol Des Educ Article Design education has traditionally been deemed a face-to-face endeavor causing online learning to be disregarded as a viable teaching option. Nonetheless, the recent impact of COVID-19 pressured design schools to rapidly migrate online, impelling many educators to utilize this unfamiliar and largely dismissed methodology. The impending problems exposed with this sudden shift point to a significant gap in research. Accordingly, this study proposes a set of guidelines targeting design knowledge-building, based on an in-depth look at student experience during an online design course. Data were collected through a 63-item course efficiency survey (n = 59) and a series of semi-structured focus group interviews (n = 16) with the enrolled students. The following overarching themes emerged through iterative thematic analysis of the interview data: (1) flexibility and handling stress, (2) managing self-pacing issues (3) formal conversation platform, (4) content variety and access options. The themes were interpreted in relation to the survey findings and the broader research on learning. The proposed guidelines emphasize initially clear goals and objectives, pacing flexibility with progress guidance, content and communication variety, sense of presence and peer exposure, and individualized feedback. It is expected that the guidelines will be helpful in building, conducting, and evaluating future online design knowledge-building experiences. Springer Netherlands 2022-05-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9096742/ /pubmed/35578646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09756-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Güler, Kutay Structuring knowledge-building in online design education |
title | Structuring knowledge-building in online design education |
title_full | Structuring knowledge-building in online design education |
title_fullStr | Structuring knowledge-building in online design education |
title_full_unstemmed | Structuring knowledge-building in online design education |
title_short | Structuring knowledge-building in online design education |
title_sort | structuring knowledge-building in online design education |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09756-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gulerkutay structuringknowledgebuildinginonlinedesigneducation |