Cargando…

How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme

Qualitative research can enhance the design, conduct and interpretation of trials. Despite this, few trials incorporate qualitative methods, and those that do may not realise their full potential. In this commentary, we highlight how qualitative research can contribute to the design, conduct and day...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, Alison, Hoare, Sarah, Modi, Rakesh, Williams, Kate, Dymond, Andrew, Chapman, Cheryl, Griffin, Simon, Mant, Jonathan, Burt, Jenni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35549744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06308-7
_version_ 1784706045874012160
author Powell, Alison
Hoare, Sarah
Modi, Rakesh
Williams, Kate
Dymond, Andrew
Chapman, Cheryl
Griffin, Simon
Mant, Jonathan
Burt, Jenni
author_facet Powell, Alison
Hoare, Sarah
Modi, Rakesh
Williams, Kate
Dymond, Andrew
Chapman, Cheryl
Griffin, Simon
Mant, Jonathan
Burt, Jenni
author_sort Powell, Alison
collection PubMed
description Qualitative research can enhance the design, conduct and interpretation of trials. Despite this, few trials incorporate qualitative methods, and those that do may not realise their full potential. In this commentary, we highlight how qualitative research can contribute to the design, conduct and day-to-day running of a trial, outlining the working arrangements and relationships that facilitate these contributions. In doing so, we draw on (i) existing frameworks on the role of qualitative research alongside trials and (ii) our experience of integrated qualitative research conducted as part of the feasibility study of the SAFER trial (Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke), a cluster randomised controlled trial of screening people aged 70 and above for atrial fibrillation in primary care in England. The activities and presence of the qualitative team contributed to important changes in the design, conduct and day-to-day running of the SAFER feasibility study, and the subsequent main trial, informing diverse decisions concerning trial documentation, trial delivery, timing and content of measures and the information given to participating patients and practices. These included asking practices to give screening results to all participants and not just to ‘screen positive’ participants, and greater recognition of the contribution of practice reception staff to trial delivery. These changes were facilitated by a ‘one research team’ approach that underpinned all formal and informal working processes from the outset and maximised the value of both qualitative and trial coordination expertise. The challenging problems facing health services require a combination of research methods and data types. Our experience and the literature show that the benefits of embedding qualitative research in trials are more likely to be realised if attention is given to both structural factors and relationships from the outset. These include sustained and sufficient funding for qualitative research, embedding qualitative research fully within the trial programme, providing shared infrastructure and resources and committing to relationships based on mutual recognition of and respect for the value of different methods and perspectives. We outline key learning for the planning of future trials. Trial registration: Screening for atrial fibrillation with ECG to reduce stroke ISRCTN16939438 (feasibility study); Screening for atrial fibrillation with ECG to reduce stroke – a randomised controlled trial ISRCTN72104369.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90967502022-05-12 How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme Powell, Alison Hoare, Sarah Modi, Rakesh Williams, Kate Dymond, Andrew Chapman, Cheryl Griffin, Simon Mant, Jonathan Burt, Jenni Trials Commentary Qualitative research can enhance the design, conduct and interpretation of trials. Despite this, few trials incorporate qualitative methods, and those that do may not realise their full potential. In this commentary, we highlight how qualitative research can contribute to the design, conduct and day-to-day running of a trial, outlining the working arrangements and relationships that facilitate these contributions. In doing so, we draw on (i) existing frameworks on the role of qualitative research alongside trials and (ii) our experience of integrated qualitative research conducted as part of the feasibility study of the SAFER trial (Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke), a cluster randomised controlled trial of screening people aged 70 and above for atrial fibrillation in primary care in England. The activities and presence of the qualitative team contributed to important changes in the design, conduct and day-to-day running of the SAFER feasibility study, and the subsequent main trial, informing diverse decisions concerning trial documentation, trial delivery, timing and content of measures and the information given to participating patients and practices. These included asking practices to give screening results to all participants and not just to ‘screen positive’ participants, and greater recognition of the contribution of practice reception staff to trial delivery. These changes were facilitated by a ‘one research team’ approach that underpinned all formal and informal working processes from the outset and maximised the value of both qualitative and trial coordination expertise. The challenging problems facing health services require a combination of research methods and data types. Our experience and the literature show that the benefits of embedding qualitative research in trials are more likely to be realised if attention is given to both structural factors and relationships from the outset. These include sustained and sufficient funding for qualitative research, embedding qualitative research fully within the trial programme, providing shared infrastructure and resources and committing to relationships based on mutual recognition of and respect for the value of different methods and perspectives. We outline key learning for the planning of future trials. Trial registration: Screening for atrial fibrillation with ECG to reduce stroke ISRCTN16939438 (feasibility study); Screening for atrial fibrillation with ECG to reduce stroke – a randomised controlled trial ISRCTN72104369. BioMed Central 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9096750/ /pubmed/35549744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06308-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Powell, Alison
Hoare, Sarah
Modi, Rakesh
Williams, Kate
Dymond, Andrew
Chapman, Cheryl
Griffin, Simon
Mant, Jonathan
Burt, Jenni
How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme
title How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme
title_full How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme
title_fullStr How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme
title_full_unstemmed How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme
title_short How to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the SAFER trial programme
title_sort how to embed qualitative research in trials: insights from the feasibility study of the safer trial programme
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35549744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06308-7
work_keys_str_mv AT powellalison howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme
AT hoaresarah howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme
AT modirakesh howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme
AT williamskate howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme
AT dymondandrew howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme
AT chapmancheryl howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme
AT griffinsimon howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme
AT mantjonathan howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme
AT burtjenni howtoembedqualitativeresearchintrialsinsightsfromthefeasibilitystudyofthesafertrialprogramme