Cargando…

Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled

Climate change is expanding drylands even as land use practices degrade them. Representing ∼40% of Earth’s terrestrial surface, drylands rely on biological soil crusts (biocrusts) for key ecosystem functions including soil stability, biogeochemical cycling, and water capture. Understanding how biocr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antoninka, Anita, Chuckran, Peter F., Mau, Rebecca L., Slate, Mandy L., Mishler, Brent D., Oliver, Melvin J., Coe, Kirsten K., Stark, Llo R., Fisher, Kirsten M., Bowker, Matthew A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.821860
_version_ 1784706084241408000
author Antoninka, Anita
Chuckran, Peter F.
Mau, Rebecca L.
Slate, Mandy L.
Mishler, Brent D.
Oliver, Melvin J.
Coe, Kirsten K.
Stark, Llo R.
Fisher, Kirsten M.
Bowker, Matthew A.
author_facet Antoninka, Anita
Chuckran, Peter F.
Mau, Rebecca L.
Slate, Mandy L.
Mishler, Brent D.
Oliver, Melvin J.
Coe, Kirsten K.
Stark, Llo R.
Fisher, Kirsten M.
Bowker, Matthew A.
author_sort Antoninka, Anita
collection PubMed
description Climate change is expanding drylands even as land use practices degrade them. Representing ∼40% of Earth’s terrestrial surface, drylands rely on biological soil crusts (biocrusts) for key ecosystem functions including soil stability, biogeochemical cycling, and water capture. Understanding how biocrusts adapt to climate change is critical to understanding how dryland ecosystems will function with altered climate. We investigated the sensitivity of biocrusts to experimentally imposed novel climates to track changes in productivity and stability under both warming and cooling scenarios. We established three common gardens along an elevational-climate gradient on the Colorado Plateau. Mature biocrusts were collected from each site and reciprocally transplanted intact. Over 20 months we monitored visible species composition and cover, chlorophyll a, and the composition of soil bacterial communities using high throughput sequencing. We hypothesized that biocrusts replanted at their home site would show local preference, and biocrusts transplanted to novel environments would maintain higher cover and stability at elevations higher than their origin, compared to at elevations lower than their origin. We expected responses of the visible biocrust cover and soil bacterial components of the biocrust community to be coupled, with later successional taxa showing higher sensitivity to novel environments. Only high elevation sourced biocrusts maintained higher biocrust cover and community stability at their site of origin. Biocrusts from all sources had higher cover and stability in the high elevation garden. Later successional taxa decreased cover in low elevation gardens, suggesting successional reversal with warming. Visible community composition was influenced by both source and transplant environment. In contrast, soil bacterial community composition was not influenced by transplant environments but retained fidelity to the source. Thus, responses of the visible and soil bacterial components of the biocrust community were not coupled. Synthesis: Our results suggest biocrust communities are sensitive to climate change, and loss of species and function can be expected, while associated soil bacteria may be buffered against rapid change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9096946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90969462022-05-13 Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled Antoninka, Anita Chuckran, Peter F. Mau, Rebecca L. Slate, Mandy L. Mishler, Brent D. Oliver, Melvin J. Coe, Kirsten K. Stark, Llo R. Fisher, Kirsten M. Bowker, Matthew A. Front Microbiol Microbiology Climate change is expanding drylands even as land use practices degrade them. Representing ∼40% of Earth’s terrestrial surface, drylands rely on biological soil crusts (biocrusts) for key ecosystem functions including soil stability, biogeochemical cycling, and water capture. Understanding how biocrusts adapt to climate change is critical to understanding how dryland ecosystems will function with altered climate. We investigated the sensitivity of biocrusts to experimentally imposed novel climates to track changes in productivity and stability under both warming and cooling scenarios. We established three common gardens along an elevational-climate gradient on the Colorado Plateau. Mature biocrusts were collected from each site and reciprocally transplanted intact. Over 20 months we monitored visible species composition and cover, chlorophyll a, and the composition of soil bacterial communities using high throughput sequencing. We hypothesized that biocrusts replanted at their home site would show local preference, and biocrusts transplanted to novel environments would maintain higher cover and stability at elevations higher than their origin, compared to at elevations lower than their origin. We expected responses of the visible biocrust cover and soil bacterial components of the biocrust community to be coupled, with later successional taxa showing higher sensitivity to novel environments. Only high elevation sourced biocrusts maintained higher biocrust cover and community stability at their site of origin. Biocrusts from all sources had higher cover and stability in the high elevation garden. Later successional taxa decreased cover in low elevation gardens, suggesting successional reversal with warming. Visible community composition was influenced by both source and transplant environment. In contrast, soil bacterial community composition was not influenced by transplant environments but retained fidelity to the source. Thus, responses of the visible and soil bacterial components of the biocrust community were not coupled. Synthesis: Our results suggest biocrust communities are sensitive to climate change, and loss of species and function can be expected, while associated soil bacteria may be buffered against rapid change. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9096946/ /pubmed/35572693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.821860 Text en Copyright © 2022 Antoninka, Chuckran, Mau, Slate, Mishler, Oliver, Coe, Stark, Fisher and Bowker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Antoninka, Anita
Chuckran, Peter F.
Mau, Rebecca L.
Slate, Mandy L.
Mishler, Brent D.
Oliver, Melvin J.
Coe, Kirsten K.
Stark, Llo R.
Fisher, Kirsten M.
Bowker, Matthew A.
Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled
title Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled
title_full Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled
title_fullStr Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled
title_full_unstemmed Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled
title_short Responses of Biocrust and Associated Soil Bacteria to Novel Climates Are Not Tightly Coupled
title_sort responses of biocrust and associated soil bacteria to novel climates are not tightly coupled
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35572693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.821860
work_keys_str_mv AT antoninkaanita responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT chuckranpeterf responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT maurebeccal responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT slatemandyl responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT mishlerbrentd responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT olivermelvinj responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT coekirstenk responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT starkllor responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT fisherkirstenm responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled
AT bowkermatthewa responsesofbiocrustandassociatedsoilbacteriatonovelclimatesarenottightlycoupled