Cargando…

CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination—same but different?

Cardiac involvement has been described in varying proportions of patients recovered from COVID-19 and proposed as a potential cause of prolonged symptoms, often described as post-COVID or long COVID syndrome. Recently, cardiac complications have been reported from COVID-19 vaccines as well. We aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doeblin, Patrick, Jahnke, Constantin, Schneider, Matthias, Al-Tabatabaee, Sarah, Goetze, Collin, Weiss, Karl J., Tanacli, Radu, Faragli, Alessandro, Witt, Undine, Stehning, Christian, Seidel, Franziska, Elsanhoury, Ahmed, Kühne, Titus, Tschöpe, Carsten, Pieske, Burkert, Kelle, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9097142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02623-x
_version_ 1784706117843025920
author Doeblin, Patrick
Jahnke, Constantin
Schneider, Matthias
Al-Tabatabaee, Sarah
Goetze, Collin
Weiss, Karl J.
Tanacli, Radu
Faragli, Alessandro
Witt, Undine
Stehning, Christian
Seidel, Franziska
Elsanhoury, Ahmed
Kühne, Titus
Tschöpe, Carsten
Pieske, Burkert
Kelle, Sebastian
author_facet Doeblin, Patrick
Jahnke, Constantin
Schneider, Matthias
Al-Tabatabaee, Sarah
Goetze, Collin
Weiss, Karl J.
Tanacli, Radu
Faragli, Alessandro
Witt, Undine
Stehning, Christian
Seidel, Franziska
Elsanhoury, Ahmed
Kühne, Titus
Tschöpe, Carsten
Pieske, Burkert
Kelle, Sebastian
author_sort Doeblin, Patrick
collection PubMed
description Cardiac involvement has been described in varying proportions of patients recovered from COVID-19 and proposed as a potential cause of prolonged symptoms, often described as post-COVID or long COVID syndrome. Recently, cardiac complications have been reported from COVID-19 vaccines as well. We aimed to compare CMR-findings in patients with clinical cardiac symptoms after COVID-19 and after vaccination. From May 2020 to May 2021, we included 104 patients with suspected cardiac involvement after COVID-19 who received a clinically indicated cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination at a high-volume center. The mean time from first positive PCR to CMR was 112  ± 76 days. During their COVID-19 disease, 21% of patients required hospitalization, 17% supplemental oxygen and 7% mechanical ventilation. In 34 (32.7%) of patients, CMR provided a clinically relevant diagnosis: Isolated pericarditis in 10 (9.6%), %), acute myocarditis (both LLC) in 7 (6.7%), possible myocarditis (one LLC) in 5 (4.8%), ischemia in 4 (3.8%), recent infarction in 2 (1.9%), old infarction in 4 (3.8%), dilated cardiomyopathy in 3 (2.9%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 2 (1.9%), aortic stenosis, pleural tumor and mitral valve prolapse each in 1 (1.0%). Between May 2021 and August 2021, we examined an additional 27 patients with suspected cardiac disease after COVID-19 vaccination. Of these, CMR provided at least one diagnosis in 22 (81.5%): Isolated pericarditis in 4 (14.8%), acute myocarditis in 9 (33.3%), possible myocarditis (acute or subsided) in 6 (22.2%), ischemia in 3 (37.5% out of 8 patients with stress test), isolated pericardial effusion (> 10 mm) and non-compaction-cardiomyopathy each in 1 (3.7%). The number of myocarditis diagnoses after COVID-19 was highly dependent on the stringency of the myocarditis criteria applied. When including only cases of matching edema and LGE and excluding findings in the right ventricular insertion site, the number of cases dropped from 7 to 2 while the number of cases after COVID-19 vaccination remained unchanged at 9. While myocarditis is an overall rare side effect after COVID-19 vaccination, it is currently the leading cause of myocarditis in our institution due to the large number of vaccinations applied over the last months. Contrary to myocarditis after vaccination, LGE and edema in myocarditis after COVID-19 often did not match or were confined to the RV-insertion site. Whether these cases truly represent myocarditis or a different pathological entity is to be determined in further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9097142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90971422022-05-12 CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination—same but different? Doeblin, Patrick Jahnke, Constantin Schneider, Matthias Al-Tabatabaee, Sarah Goetze, Collin Weiss, Karl J. Tanacli, Radu Faragli, Alessandro Witt, Undine Stehning, Christian Seidel, Franziska Elsanhoury, Ahmed Kühne, Titus Tschöpe, Carsten Pieske, Burkert Kelle, Sebastian Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper Cardiac involvement has been described in varying proportions of patients recovered from COVID-19 and proposed as a potential cause of prolonged symptoms, often described as post-COVID or long COVID syndrome. Recently, cardiac complications have been reported from COVID-19 vaccines as well. We aimed to compare CMR-findings in patients with clinical cardiac symptoms after COVID-19 and after vaccination. From May 2020 to May 2021, we included 104 patients with suspected cardiac involvement after COVID-19 who received a clinically indicated cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination at a high-volume center. The mean time from first positive PCR to CMR was 112  ± 76 days. During their COVID-19 disease, 21% of patients required hospitalization, 17% supplemental oxygen and 7% mechanical ventilation. In 34 (32.7%) of patients, CMR provided a clinically relevant diagnosis: Isolated pericarditis in 10 (9.6%), %), acute myocarditis (both LLC) in 7 (6.7%), possible myocarditis (one LLC) in 5 (4.8%), ischemia in 4 (3.8%), recent infarction in 2 (1.9%), old infarction in 4 (3.8%), dilated cardiomyopathy in 3 (2.9%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 2 (1.9%), aortic stenosis, pleural tumor and mitral valve prolapse each in 1 (1.0%). Between May 2021 and August 2021, we examined an additional 27 patients with suspected cardiac disease after COVID-19 vaccination. Of these, CMR provided at least one diagnosis in 22 (81.5%): Isolated pericarditis in 4 (14.8%), acute myocarditis in 9 (33.3%), possible myocarditis (acute or subsided) in 6 (22.2%), ischemia in 3 (37.5% out of 8 patients with stress test), isolated pericardial effusion (> 10 mm) and non-compaction-cardiomyopathy each in 1 (3.7%). The number of myocarditis diagnoses after COVID-19 was highly dependent on the stringency of the myocarditis criteria applied. When including only cases of matching edema and LGE and excluding findings in the right ventricular insertion site, the number of cases dropped from 7 to 2 while the number of cases after COVID-19 vaccination remained unchanged at 9. While myocarditis is an overall rare side effect after COVID-19 vaccination, it is currently the leading cause of myocarditis in our institution due to the large number of vaccinations applied over the last months. Contrary to myocarditis after vaccination, LGE and edema in myocarditis after COVID-19 often did not match or were confined to the RV-insertion site. Whether these cases truly represent myocarditis or a different pathological entity is to be determined in further studies. Springer Netherlands 2022-05-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9097142/ /pubmed/37726611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02623-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Doeblin, Patrick
Jahnke, Constantin
Schneider, Matthias
Al-Tabatabaee, Sarah
Goetze, Collin
Weiss, Karl J.
Tanacli, Radu
Faragli, Alessandro
Witt, Undine
Stehning, Christian
Seidel, Franziska
Elsanhoury, Ahmed
Kühne, Titus
Tschöpe, Carsten
Pieske, Burkert
Kelle, Sebastian
CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination—same but different?
title CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination—same but different?
title_full CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination—same but different?
title_fullStr CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination—same but different?
title_full_unstemmed CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination—same but different?
title_short CMR findings after COVID-19 and after COVID-19-vaccination—same but different?
title_sort cmr findings after covid-19 and after covid-19-vaccination—same but different?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9097142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37726611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02623-x
work_keys_str_mv AT doeblinpatrick cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT jahnkeconstantin cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT schneidermatthias cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT altabatabaeesarah cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT goetzecollin cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT weisskarlj cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT tanacliradu cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT faraglialessandro cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT wittundine cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT stehningchristian cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT seidelfranziska cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT elsanhouryahmed cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT kuhnetitus cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT tschopecarsten cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT pieskeburkert cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent
AT kellesebastian cmrfindingsaftercovid19andaftercovid19vaccinationsamebutdifferent