Cargando…

Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Multi-site studies in stroke rehabilitation are important for determining whether a technology and/or treatment can be successfully administered by sites other than the originating site and with similar positive outcomes. This study is the first multi-site clinical trial of a novel inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knutson, Jayme S., Friedl, Amy S., Hansen, Kristine M., Harley, Mary Y., Barrett, A. M., Raghavan, Preeti, Plow, Ela B., Gunzler, Douglas D., Chae, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9097385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35549747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06303-y
_version_ 1784706166220128256
author Knutson, Jayme S.
Friedl, Amy S.
Hansen, Kristine M.
Harley, Mary Y.
Barrett, A. M.
Raghavan, Preeti
Plow, Ela B.
Gunzler, Douglas D.
Chae, John
author_facet Knutson, Jayme S.
Friedl, Amy S.
Hansen, Kristine M.
Harley, Mary Y.
Barrett, A. M.
Raghavan, Preeti
Plow, Ela B.
Gunzler, Douglas D.
Chae, John
author_sort Knutson, Jayme S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multi-site studies in stroke rehabilitation are important for determining whether a technology and/or treatment can be successfully administered by sites other than the originating site and with similar positive outcomes. This study is the first multi-site clinical trial of a novel intervention for post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation called contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES). Previous pilot and single-site studies showed positive effects of CCFES on upper limb impairment and hand dexterity in stroke survivors. The main purpose of this study is to confirm and demonstrate the efficacy of CCFES in a larger group of most likely responders across multiple clinical sites. METHODS: Up to 129 stroke survivors with moderate to severe upper extremity hemiparesis at 4 clinical trial sites will be randomized to CCFES, cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (cNMES), or task-oriented-training (TOT). Participants will receive 12 weeks of group-specific therapy. Blinded assessments of upper limb impairment and activity limitation, quality of life, and neurophysiology will be used to compare outcomes at baseline, after treatment, and up to 6 months post-treatment. The primary endpoint is change in dexterity from baseline to 6 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION: Loss of hand function following stroke is a major rehabilitation problem affecting millions of people per year globally. More effective rehabilitation therapies are needed to restore hand function in these individuals. This study will determine whether CCFES therapy produces greater improvements in upper extremity function than cNMES or TOT, and will begin to elucidate the different mechanisms underlying each of the three treatments. This multi-site study is a critical step in advancing a novel method of rehabilitation toward clinical translation and widespread dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574623. Registered prior to first enrollment; July 2, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06303-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9097385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90973852022-05-13 Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial Knutson, Jayme S. Friedl, Amy S. Hansen, Kristine M. Harley, Mary Y. Barrett, A. M. Raghavan, Preeti Plow, Ela B. Gunzler, Douglas D. Chae, John Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Multi-site studies in stroke rehabilitation are important for determining whether a technology and/or treatment can be successfully administered by sites other than the originating site and with similar positive outcomes. This study is the first multi-site clinical trial of a novel intervention for post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation called contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES). Previous pilot and single-site studies showed positive effects of CCFES on upper limb impairment and hand dexterity in stroke survivors. The main purpose of this study is to confirm and demonstrate the efficacy of CCFES in a larger group of most likely responders across multiple clinical sites. METHODS: Up to 129 stroke survivors with moderate to severe upper extremity hemiparesis at 4 clinical trial sites will be randomized to CCFES, cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (cNMES), or task-oriented-training (TOT). Participants will receive 12 weeks of group-specific therapy. Blinded assessments of upper limb impairment and activity limitation, quality of life, and neurophysiology will be used to compare outcomes at baseline, after treatment, and up to 6 months post-treatment. The primary endpoint is change in dexterity from baseline to 6 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION: Loss of hand function following stroke is a major rehabilitation problem affecting millions of people per year globally. More effective rehabilitation therapies are needed to restore hand function in these individuals. This study will determine whether CCFES therapy produces greater improvements in upper extremity function than cNMES or TOT, and will begin to elucidate the different mechanisms underlying each of the three treatments. This multi-site study is a critical step in advancing a novel method of rehabilitation toward clinical translation and widespread dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574623. Registered prior to first enrollment; July 2, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06303-y. BioMed Central 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9097385/ /pubmed/35549747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06303-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Knutson, Jayme S.
Friedl, Amy S.
Hansen, Kristine M.
Harley, Mary Y.
Barrett, A. M.
Raghavan, Preeti
Plow, Ela B.
Gunzler, Douglas D.
Chae, John
Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial
title Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation and task-oriented training for recovery of hand function after stroke: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9097385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35549747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06303-y
work_keys_str_mv AT knutsonjaymes efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT friedlamys efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hansenkristinem efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT harleymaryy efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT barrettam efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT raghavanpreeti efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT plowelab efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gunzlerdouglasd efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chaejohn efficacyofcontralaterallycontrolledfunctionalelectricalstimulationcomparedtocyclicneuromuscularelectricalstimulationandtaskorientedtrainingforrecoveryofhandfunctionafterstrokestudyprotocolforamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial