Cargando…

Presence of a Ground-Glass Opacity Component Is the True Prognostic Determinant in Clinical Stage I NSCLC

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have suggested that including presence or absence of ground-glass opacity (GGO) may improve the tumor descriptor (T descriptor) classification in clinical stage I NSCLC. In this study, we analyzed prognostic implications of presence or absence of GGO, size of the solid c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamada, Akira, Suda, Kenichi, Fujino, Toshio, Nishino, Masaya, Ohara, Shuta, Koga, Takamasa, Kabasawa, Takanobu, Chiba, Masato, Shimoji, Masaki, Endoh, Makoto, Takemoto, Toshiki, Soh, Junichi, Yanagawa, Naoki, Shiono, Satoshi, Mitsudomi, Tetsuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9097453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100321
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have suggested that including presence or absence of ground-glass opacity (GGO) may improve the tumor descriptor (T descriptor) classification in clinical stage I NSCLC. In this study, we analyzed prognostic implications of presence or absence of GGO, size of the solid component, and predominant histology to identify the true prognostic determinant for early-stage NSCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 384 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (solid: 242, part solid: 142) who underwent complete resection between 2009 and 2013. RESULTS: Survival curves of the whole cohort revealed good separation using the current TNM classification. Nevertheless, the part-solid group had a favorable prognosis irrespective of solid component size. Conversely, patients in the solid tumor group with tumors between 3 and 4 cm had a worse prognosis than patients whose tumors were less than or equal to 3 cm. Thus, we propose the following novel T descriptor classification: IA, part-solid tumors; IB, solid tumors less than or equal to 3 cm; and IC, solid tumors between 3 and 4 cm. This novel classification system stratified patient prognosis better than the current classification. On pathologic evaluation, the part-solid group always had better prognoses than the solid group in each subgroup divided by pathologic grade. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that presence of GGO is the true prognostic determinant of stage I NSCLC, irrespective of the size of the solid component. Our novel T descriptor classification system could more accurately predict prognoses of clinical stage I NSCLC cases.