Cargando…

Mortality Rate of Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Decompressive Hemicraniectomy With Obesity

Background Obesity has been shown to have a positive mortality benefit in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and dialysis and those with rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and various wasting diseases. Studies for this mortality benefit in ischemic strok...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hallan, David R, Freedman, Zachary, Rizk, Elias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9097930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573508
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24069
Descripción
Sumario:Background Obesity has been shown to have a positive mortality benefit in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and dialysis and those with rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and various wasting diseases. Studies for this mortality benefit in ischemic stroke patients are conflicting and have not been well studied in hemicraniectomy patients. We sought to determine the impact of obesity on outcomes of hemicraniectomy patients. Methods We performed a retrospective case-control database analysis using a multi-institutional database (TriNetX) looking at obese versus non-obese patients with ischemic stroke undergoing hemicraniectomy. Our primary endpoint was mortality. Secondary endpoints included seizure, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebral infarction, deep vein thrombosis, tracheostomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Cohorts were propensity-score matched for confounders. Results After propensity score matching for basic demographics and common comorbidities, as well as indicators of stroke severity, 646 patients were identified that were obese and had an ischemic stroke with subsequent hemicraniectomy (cohort 1), and 646 patients were identified who were non-obese with ischemic stroke and hemicraniectomy (cohort 2). Thirty-day survival rate was 98.142% in the obese vs. 87.771% in the non-obese cohorts, 90-day survival was 85.15% vs. 79.35%, 180-day survival was 96.44% vs. 84.52%, 365-day survival was 94.272% vs. 81.734%, and five-year survival was 81.889% vs. 75.077%, respectively. At five years, risk difference was −7.276% (95% CI: −11.757, −2.794) and odds ratio was 0.666 (95% CI: 0.510, 0.871) (p = 0.0029). Despite a higher mortality rate, obese patients had a statistically significant increase in pulmonary embolism (11.61% vs. 5.108, p < 0.0001), deep venous thrombosis (16.873% vs. 9.133%, p < 0.0001), and MI (8.824% vs. 5.882%, p = 0.0428). There was no significant difference in intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator dependence, tracheostomy placement, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement, or intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions Despite the increased risk of ischemic stroke, obese patients who undergo hemicraniectomy have decreased mortality rates compared to their non-obese counterparts.