Cargando…

Alchemical Free Energy Methods Applied to Complexes of the First Bromodomain of BRD4

[Image: see text] Accurate and rapid predictions of the binding affinity of a compound to a target are one of the ultimate goals of computer aided drug design. Alchemical approaches to free energy estimations follow the path from an initial state of the system to the final state through alchemical c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guest, Ellen E., Cervantes, Luis F., Pickett, Stephen D., Brooks, Charles L., Hirst, Jonathan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35258972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01229
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] Accurate and rapid predictions of the binding affinity of a compound to a target are one of the ultimate goals of computer aided drug design. Alchemical approaches to free energy estimations follow the path from an initial state of the system to the final state through alchemical changes of the energy function during a molecular dynamics simulation. Herein, we explore the accuracy and efficiency of two such techniques: relative free energy perturbation (FEP) and multisite lambda dynamics (MSλD). These are applied to a series of inhibitors for the bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4). We demonstrate a procedure for obtaining accurate relative binding free energies using MSλD when dealing with a change in the net charge of the ligand. This resulted in an impressive comparison with experiment, with an average difference of 0.4 ± 0.4 kcal mol(–1). In a benchmarking study for the relative FEP calculations, we found that using 20 lambda windows with 0.5 ns of equilibration and 1 ns of data collection for each window gave the optimal compromise between accuracy and speed. Overall, relative FEP and MSλD predicted binding free energies with comparable accuracy, an average of 0.6 kcal mol(–1) for each method. However, MSλD makes predictions for a larger molecular space over a much shorter time scale than relative FEP, with MSλD requiring a factor of 18 times less simulation time for the entire molecule space.