Cargando…
Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting
PURPOSE: Psychometric evaluation of the Nocturia Impact (NI) Diary was conducted to support its use as a trial endpoint. METHODS: As part of a randomized, controlled Phase 2 clinical trial investigating a novel drug candidate for nocturnal polyuria, adult nocturia patients completed the NI Diary and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4 |
_version_ | 1784706426218741760 |
---|---|
author | Hudgens, Stacie Howerter, Amy Polek, Ela Andersson, Fredrik L. |
author_facet | Hudgens, Stacie Howerter, Amy Polek, Ela Andersson, Fredrik L. |
author_sort | Hudgens, Stacie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Psychometric evaluation of the Nocturia Impact (NI) Diary was conducted to support its use as a trial endpoint. METHODS: As part of a randomized, controlled Phase 2 clinical trial investigating a novel drug candidate for nocturnal polyuria, adult nocturia patients completed the NI Diary and a voiding diary for three nights preceding their clinic visit at Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment). Exit interviews were conducted to obtain patient impressions of the NI Diary. RESULTS: A total of N = 302 participants were included. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the 11-item measure is unidimensional with values of CFI, TLI, and RMSEA meeting relevant thresholds. Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.941) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients 0.730–0.880). Convergent validity with two reference measures was demonstrated with strong correlations of 0.573–0.730 were shown. Significant differences (P = 0.0018, standardized effect size = 0.372) between groups defined by number of night-time voids supported known-groups validity. Exit interviews in 66 patients indicated all participants experienced improvement in at least 1 NI Diary item and that a 1-point improvement on the item response scale and 1-void reduction per night (associated with an average best cut point on ROC analysis of − 11.6) constituted meaningful improvement. Anchor and distribution-based analyses identified a meaningful change threshold of − 15 to − 18 points on the NI Diary. CONCLUSION: The NI Diary is a reliable and valid patient-reported psychometric instrument which is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the impact of nocturia on patient quality of life in the clinical trial setting. Trial registration number and registration date NCT03201419; June 28, 2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9098619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90986192022-05-14 Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting Hudgens, Stacie Howerter, Amy Polek, Ela Andersson, Fredrik L. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Psychometric evaluation of the Nocturia Impact (NI) Diary was conducted to support its use as a trial endpoint. METHODS: As part of a randomized, controlled Phase 2 clinical trial investigating a novel drug candidate for nocturnal polyuria, adult nocturia patients completed the NI Diary and a voiding diary for three nights preceding their clinic visit at Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment). Exit interviews were conducted to obtain patient impressions of the NI Diary. RESULTS: A total of N = 302 participants were included. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the 11-item measure is unidimensional with values of CFI, TLI, and RMSEA meeting relevant thresholds. Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.941) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients 0.730–0.880). Convergent validity with two reference measures was demonstrated with strong correlations of 0.573–0.730 were shown. Significant differences (P = 0.0018, standardized effect size = 0.372) between groups defined by number of night-time voids supported known-groups validity. Exit interviews in 66 patients indicated all participants experienced improvement in at least 1 NI Diary item and that a 1-point improvement on the item response scale and 1-void reduction per night (associated with an average best cut point on ROC analysis of − 11.6) constituted meaningful improvement. Anchor and distribution-based analyses identified a meaningful change threshold of − 15 to − 18 points on the NI Diary. CONCLUSION: The NI Diary is a reliable and valid patient-reported psychometric instrument which is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the impact of nocturia on patient quality of life in the clinical trial setting. Trial registration number and registration date NCT03201419; June 28, 2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9098619/ /pubmed/34932192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hudgens, Stacie Howerter, Amy Polek, Ela Andersson, Fredrik L. Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting |
title | Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting |
title_full | Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting |
title_fullStr | Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting |
title_short | Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting |
title_sort | psychometric validation and interpretation of the nocturia impact diary in a clinical trial setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hudgensstacie psychometricvalidationandinterpretationofthenocturiaimpactdiaryinaclinicaltrialsetting AT howerteramy psychometricvalidationandinterpretationofthenocturiaimpactdiaryinaclinicaltrialsetting AT polekela psychometricvalidationandinterpretationofthenocturiaimpactdiaryinaclinicaltrialsetting AT anderssonfredrikl psychometricvalidationandinterpretationofthenocturiaimpactdiaryinaclinicaltrialsetting |