Cargando…

Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting

PURPOSE: Psychometric evaluation of the Nocturia Impact (NI) Diary was conducted to support its use as a trial endpoint. METHODS: As part of a randomized, controlled Phase 2 clinical trial investigating a novel drug candidate for nocturnal polyuria, adult nocturia patients completed the NI Diary and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudgens, Stacie, Howerter, Amy, Polek, Ela, Andersson, Fredrik L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4
_version_ 1784706426218741760
author Hudgens, Stacie
Howerter, Amy
Polek, Ela
Andersson, Fredrik L.
author_facet Hudgens, Stacie
Howerter, Amy
Polek, Ela
Andersson, Fredrik L.
author_sort Hudgens, Stacie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Psychometric evaluation of the Nocturia Impact (NI) Diary was conducted to support its use as a trial endpoint. METHODS: As part of a randomized, controlled Phase 2 clinical trial investigating a novel drug candidate for nocturnal polyuria, adult nocturia patients completed the NI Diary and a voiding diary for three nights preceding their clinic visit at Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment). Exit interviews were conducted to obtain patient impressions of the NI Diary. RESULTS: A total of N = 302 participants were included. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the 11-item measure is unidimensional with values of CFI, TLI, and RMSEA meeting relevant thresholds. Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.941) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients 0.730–0.880). Convergent validity with two reference measures was demonstrated with strong correlations of 0.573–0.730 were shown. Significant differences (P = 0.0018, standardized effect size = 0.372) between groups defined by number of night-time voids supported known-groups validity. Exit interviews in 66 patients indicated all participants experienced improvement in at least 1 NI Diary item and that a 1-point improvement on the item response scale and 1-void reduction per night (associated with an average best cut point on ROC analysis of − 11.6) constituted meaningful improvement. Anchor and distribution-based analyses identified a meaningful change threshold of − 15 to − 18 points on the NI Diary. CONCLUSION: The NI Diary is a reliable and valid patient-reported psychometric instrument which is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the impact of nocturia on patient quality of life in the clinical trial setting. Trial registration number and registration date NCT03201419; June 28, 2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9098619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90986192022-05-14 Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting Hudgens, Stacie Howerter, Amy Polek, Ela Andersson, Fredrik L. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Psychometric evaluation of the Nocturia Impact (NI) Diary was conducted to support its use as a trial endpoint. METHODS: As part of a randomized, controlled Phase 2 clinical trial investigating a novel drug candidate for nocturnal polyuria, adult nocturia patients completed the NI Diary and a voiding diary for three nights preceding their clinic visit at Baseline and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (end of treatment). Exit interviews were conducted to obtain patient impressions of the NI Diary. RESULTS: A total of N = 302 participants were included. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the 11-item measure is unidimensional with values of CFI, TLI, and RMSEA meeting relevant thresholds. Good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.941) and test–retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients 0.730–0.880). Convergent validity with two reference measures was demonstrated with strong correlations of 0.573–0.730 were shown. Significant differences (P = 0.0018, standardized effect size = 0.372) between groups defined by number of night-time voids supported known-groups validity. Exit interviews in 66 patients indicated all participants experienced improvement in at least 1 NI Diary item and that a 1-point improvement on the item response scale and 1-void reduction per night (associated with an average best cut point on ROC analysis of − 11.6) constituted meaningful improvement. Anchor and distribution-based analyses identified a meaningful change threshold of − 15 to − 18 points on the NI Diary. CONCLUSION: The NI Diary is a reliable and valid patient-reported psychometric instrument which is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the impact of nocturia on patient quality of life in the clinical trial setting. Trial registration number and registration date NCT03201419; June 28, 2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9098619/ /pubmed/34932192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hudgens, Stacie
Howerter, Amy
Polek, Ela
Andersson, Fredrik L.
Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting
title Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting
title_full Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting
title_fullStr Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting
title_short Psychometric validation and interpretation of the Nocturia Impact Diary in a clinical trial setting
title_sort psychometric validation and interpretation of the nocturia impact diary in a clinical trial setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03060-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hudgensstacie psychometricvalidationandinterpretationofthenocturiaimpactdiaryinaclinicaltrialsetting
AT howerteramy psychometricvalidationandinterpretationofthenocturiaimpactdiaryinaclinicaltrialsetting
AT polekela psychometricvalidationandinterpretationofthenocturiaimpactdiaryinaclinicaltrialsetting
AT anderssonfredrikl psychometricvalidationandinterpretationofthenocturiaimpactdiaryinaclinicaltrialsetting