A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Six, Stefaan, Poelaert, Jan, Laureys, Steven, Maîresse, Olivier, Theuns, Peter, Bilsen, Johan, Deschepper, Reginald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Letter
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35286600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00369-x
_version_ 1784706450861326336
author Six, Stefaan
Poelaert, Jan
Laureys, Steven
Maîresse, Olivier
Theuns, Peter
Bilsen, Johan
Deschepper, Reginald
author_facet Six, Stefaan
Poelaert, Jan
Laureys, Steven
Maîresse, Olivier
Theuns, Peter
Bilsen, Johan
Deschepper, Reginald
author_sort Six, Stefaan
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9098768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90987682022-05-14 A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study” Six, Stefaan Poelaert, Jan Laureys, Steven Maîresse, Olivier Theuns, Peter Bilsen, Johan Deschepper, Reginald Pain Ther Letter Springer Healthcare 2022-03-12 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9098768/ /pubmed/35286600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00369-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Letter
Six, Stefaan
Poelaert, Jan
Laureys, Steven
Maîresse, Olivier
Theuns, Peter
Bilsen, Johan
Deschepper, Reginald
A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study”
title A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study”
title_full A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study”
title_fullStr A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study”
title_full_unstemmed A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study”
title_short A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding “Neurophysiological Assessments During Continuous Sedation Until Death Put Validity of Observational Assessments Into Question: A Prospective Observational Study”
title_sort response to: letter to the editor regarding “neurophysiological assessments during continuous sedation until death put validity of observational assessments into question: a prospective observational study”
topic Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35286600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00369-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sixstefaan aresponsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT poelaertjan aresponsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT laureyssteven aresponsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mairesseolivier aresponsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT theunspeter aresponsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bilsenjohan aresponsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT deschepperreginald aresponsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT sixstefaan responsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT poelaertjan responsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT laureyssteven responsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mairesseolivier responsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT theunspeter responsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bilsenjohan responsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT deschepperreginald responsetolettertotheeditorregardingneurophysiologicalassessmentsduringcontinuoussedationuntildeathputvalidityofobservationalassessmentsintoquestionaprospectiveobservationalstudy

Ejemplares similares