Cargando…

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to observe the effect of spinal anesthesia (SA) and ultrasound-guided caudal epidural blocks (CEB) on perioperative satisfaction in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. METHODS: A group of 106 patients were randomly allocated to receive either SA (the SA grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Shibiao, Wei, Aiping, Min, Jia, Li, Lei, Zhang, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00389-7
_version_ 1784706453060190208
author Chen, Shibiao
Wei, Aiping
Min, Jia
Li, Lei
Zhang, Yang
author_facet Chen, Shibiao
Wei, Aiping
Min, Jia
Li, Lei
Zhang, Yang
author_sort Chen, Shibiao
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to observe the effect of spinal anesthesia (SA) and ultrasound-guided caudal epidural blocks (CEB) on perioperative satisfaction in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. METHODS: A group of 106 patients were randomly allocated to receive either SA (the SA group) or CEB (the CEB group), and 11 patients were excluded. Finally, 95 patients were left, with 48 in the SA group and 47 in the CEB group for data analysis. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction with the quality of their anesthetic technique. The secondary outcome measures included postoperative pain at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 h after surgery at rest, time to first analgesic request, analgesia requirements, incidence of phantom limb syndrome (PLS), time until return of bowel function, time to ambulation, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduction > 20% from baseline, and surgeon satisfaction. RESULTS: A significantly lower proportion of patients in the SA group was highly satisfied with the quality of their anesthetic technique compared with the CEB group (20.8% versus 68.1%). NRS scores at rest were significantly lower at 4, 8, 16, and 24 h after surgery in the CEB group compared with the SA group. The time to first analgesic request was significantly earlier for patients in the SA group compared with patients in the CEB group. Analgesia requirements, the incidence of PLS, the incidence of PONV, and intraoperative MAP reduction > 20% from baseline were significantly decreased in the CEB group. There were no significant differences between the groups in time until return of bowel function, surgeon satisfaction, or time to ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural blocks have higher patient satisfaction compared with spinal anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR 2000041026) on 06/12/2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9098778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90987782022-05-14 Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Chen, Shibiao Wei, Aiping Min, Jia Li, Lei Zhang, Yang Pain Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to observe the effect of spinal anesthesia (SA) and ultrasound-guided caudal epidural blocks (CEB) on perioperative satisfaction in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. METHODS: A group of 106 patients were randomly allocated to receive either SA (the SA group) or CEB (the CEB group), and 11 patients were excluded. Finally, 95 patients were left, with 48 in the SA group and 47 in the CEB group for data analysis. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction with the quality of their anesthetic technique. The secondary outcome measures included postoperative pain at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 h after surgery at rest, time to first analgesic request, analgesia requirements, incidence of phantom limb syndrome (PLS), time until return of bowel function, time to ambulation, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) reduction > 20% from baseline, and surgeon satisfaction. RESULTS: A significantly lower proportion of patients in the SA group was highly satisfied with the quality of their anesthetic technique compared with the CEB group (20.8% versus 68.1%). NRS scores at rest were significantly lower at 4, 8, 16, and 24 h after surgery in the CEB group compared with the SA group. The time to first analgesic request was significantly earlier for patients in the SA group compared with patients in the CEB group. Analgesia requirements, the incidence of PLS, the incidence of PONV, and intraoperative MAP reduction > 20% from baseline were significantly decreased in the CEB group. There were no significant differences between the groups in time until return of bowel function, surgeon satisfaction, or time to ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural blocks have higher patient satisfaction compared with spinal anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR 2000041026) on 06/12/2020. Springer Healthcare 2022-05-02 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9098778/ /pubmed/35501468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00389-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Chen, Shibiao
Wei, Aiping
Min, Jia
Li, Lei
Zhang, Yang
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Blocks and Spinal Anesthesia for Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural blocks and spinal anesthesia for anorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00389-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chenshibiao comparisonofultrasoundguidedcaudalepiduralblocksandspinalanesthesiaforanorectalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weiaiping comparisonofultrasoundguidedcaudalepiduralblocksandspinalanesthesiaforanorectalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT minjia comparisonofultrasoundguidedcaudalepiduralblocksandspinalanesthesiaforanorectalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lilei comparisonofultrasoundguidedcaudalepiduralblocksandspinalanesthesiaforanorectalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangyang comparisonofultrasoundguidedcaudalepiduralblocksandspinalanesthesiaforanorectalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial