Cargando…

Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study

Closed-wound negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings were recently introduced with the purpose to reduce incisional surgical site infections (iSSI) in high-risk wounds. The aim of this study was to compare iSSI rates in patients after ostomy closure with and without additional application o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curchod, P., Clerc, D., Jurt, J., Hubner, M., Hahnloser, D., Demartines, N., Grass, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11856-8
_version_ 1784706467596599296
author Curchod, P.
Clerc, D.
Jurt, J.
Hubner, M.
Hahnloser, D.
Demartines, N.
Grass, F.
author_facet Curchod, P.
Clerc, D.
Jurt, J.
Hubner, M.
Hahnloser, D.
Demartines, N.
Grass, F.
author_sort Curchod, P.
collection PubMed
description Closed-wound negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings were recently introduced with the purpose to reduce incisional surgical site infections (iSSI) in high-risk wounds. The aim of this study was to compare iSSI rates in patients after ostomy closure with and without additional application of a closed-wound NPWT dressing. Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing ileo- or colostomy closure over an 8-year period (January 2013—January 2021). Intradermal non-purse string technique with absorbable sutures were used in all patients. Since November 2018, all patients (study group) received a NPWT device for a maximum of 5 days postoperatively (PICO, SMITH AND NEPHEW). Primary outcome was iSSI rate within 30 days of surgery. SSI was defined in accordance with the Center of Disease Control (CDC) classification and included superficial and deep incisional SSI. Data was retrieved from the institutional enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) database, with standardized complication assessment by trained abstractors. In total, 85 patients (25%) in the study group were comparable with 252 (75%) patients in the control group regarding demographics (age, gender, body mass index, ASA score), ostomy type and anastomotic technique (all p > 0.05), but not wound contamination class (class III: 5% vs 0%, p < 0.001). Median time to NPWT removal was 4 (IQR 3–5) days. Incisional SSI were observed in 4 patients (4.7%) in the study group and in 27 patients (10.7%) in the control group (p = 0.097). These preliminary results suggest a potential benefit of systematic application of the NPWT device after loop ostomy closure. A randomized controlled study is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9098839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90988392022-05-14 Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study Curchod, P. Clerc, D. Jurt, J. Hubner, M. Hahnloser, D. Demartines, N. Grass, F. Sci Rep Article Closed-wound negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings were recently introduced with the purpose to reduce incisional surgical site infections (iSSI) in high-risk wounds. The aim of this study was to compare iSSI rates in patients after ostomy closure with and without additional application of a closed-wound NPWT dressing. Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing ileo- or colostomy closure over an 8-year period (January 2013—January 2021). Intradermal non-purse string technique with absorbable sutures were used in all patients. Since November 2018, all patients (study group) received a NPWT device for a maximum of 5 days postoperatively (PICO, SMITH AND NEPHEW). Primary outcome was iSSI rate within 30 days of surgery. SSI was defined in accordance with the Center of Disease Control (CDC) classification and included superficial and deep incisional SSI. Data was retrieved from the institutional enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) database, with standardized complication assessment by trained abstractors. In total, 85 patients (25%) in the study group were comparable with 252 (75%) patients in the control group regarding demographics (age, gender, body mass index, ASA score), ostomy type and anastomotic technique (all p > 0.05), but not wound contamination class (class III: 5% vs 0%, p < 0.001). Median time to NPWT removal was 4 (IQR 3–5) days. Incisional SSI were observed in 4 patients (4.7%) in the study group and in 27 patients (10.7%) in the control group (p = 0.097). These preliminary results suggest a potential benefit of systematic application of the NPWT device after loop ostomy closure. A randomized controlled study is needed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9098839/ /pubmed/35550575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11856-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Curchod, P.
Clerc, D.
Jurt, J.
Hubner, M.
Hahnloser, D.
Demartines, N.
Grass, F.
Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study
title Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study
title_full Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study
title_short Closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study
title_sort closed-wound negative pressure therapy dressing after loop ostomy closure: a retrospective comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9098839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11856-8
work_keys_str_mv AT curchodp closedwoundnegativepressuretherapydressingafterloopostomyclosurearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT clercd closedwoundnegativepressuretherapydressingafterloopostomyclosurearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT jurtj closedwoundnegativepressuretherapydressingafterloopostomyclosurearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT hubnerm closedwoundnegativepressuretherapydressingafterloopostomyclosurearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT hahnloserd closedwoundnegativepressuretherapydressingafterloopostomyclosurearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT demartinesn closedwoundnegativepressuretherapydressingafterloopostomyclosurearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT grassf closedwoundnegativepressuretherapydressingafterloopostomyclosurearetrospectivecomparativestudy