Cargando…

Comparison of Efficacy Between Transabdominal and Transthoracic Surgical Approaches for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach, whether transabdominal (TA) or transthoracic (TT), for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains controversial. This study compares the efficacy of TA and TT surgical approaches for Siewert type II AEG. METHODS: Studies co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zonglin, Jiang, Huaiwu, Chen, Jin, Jiang, Yifan, Liu, Yi, Xu, Linxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.813242
_version_ 1784706515981041664
author Li, Zonglin
Jiang, Huaiwu
Chen, Jin
Jiang, Yifan
Liu, Yi
Xu, Linxia
author_facet Li, Zonglin
Jiang, Huaiwu
Chen, Jin
Jiang, Yifan
Liu, Yi
Xu, Linxia
author_sort Li, Zonglin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach, whether transabdominal (TA) or transthoracic (TT), for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains controversial. This study compares the efficacy of TA and TT surgical approaches for Siewert type II AEG. METHODS: Studies comparing the surgical and oncological outcomes of TA and TT surgical approaches for Siewert type II AEG up to June 2021 were systematically searched on the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. A pooled analysis was performed for the available data regarding the baseline features, surgical, and oncological outcomes. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Quality evaluation and publication bias were also conducted. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 2,011 patients, including 985 patients in the TA group and 1,026 patients in the TT group, were included in this study. In the pooled analysis, the surgical outcomes, namely, operative time (MD = −54.61, 95% CI = −123.76 to 14.54, P = 0.12), intraoperative blood loss (MD = −28.85, 95% CI = −71.15 to 13.46, P = 0.18), the number of dissected lymph nodes (MD = 1.90, 95% CI = −1.32 to 5.12, P = 0.25), postoperative complications (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.07, p = 0.16), anastomotic leakage rate (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.65, p = 0.93), and postoperative death rate (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.72, p = 0.73), and the oncological outcomes, namely, overall recurrence rate (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.37 to 1.50, p = 0.41), 3-year overall survival (OS) rate (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.54 to 2.65, p = 0.66), and 5-year OS rate (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.74, p = 0.30) of the two groups were all comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Both TA and TT surgical approaches are appropriate for Siewert type II AEG, and neither has a significant advantage in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9099040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90990402022-05-14 Comparison of Efficacy Between Transabdominal and Transthoracic Surgical Approaches for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Li, Zonglin Jiang, Huaiwu Chen, Jin Jiang, Yifan Liu, Yi Xu, Linxia Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach, whether transabdominal (TA) or transthoracic (TT), for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains controversial. This study compares the efficacy of TA and TT surgical approaches for Siewert type II AEG. METHODS: Studies comparing the surgical and oncological outcomes of TA and TT surgical approaches for Siewert type II AEG up to June 2021 were systematically searched on the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. A pooled analysis was performed for the available data regarding the baseline features, surgical, and oncological outcomes. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Quality evaluation and publication bias were also conducted. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 2,011 patients, including 985 patients in the TA group and 1,026 patients in the TT group, were included in this study. In the pooled analysis, the surgical outcomes, namely, operative time (MD = −54.61, 95% CI = −123.76 to 14.54, P = 0.12), intraoperative blood loss (MD = −28.85, 95% CI = −71.15 to 13.46, P = 0.18), the number of dissected lymph nodes (MD = 1.90, 95% CI = −1.32 to 5.12, P = 0.25), postoperative complications (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.07, p = 0.16), anastomotic leakage rate (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.65, p = 0.93), and postoperative death rate (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.72, p = 0.73), and the oncological outcomes, namely, overall recurrence rate (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.37 to 1.50, p = 0.41), 3-year overall survival (OS) rate (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.54 to 2.65, p = 0.66), and 5-year OS rate (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.74, p = 0.30) of the two groups were all comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Both TA and TT surgical approaches are appropriate for Siewert type II AEG, and neither has a significant advantage in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9099040/ /pubmed/35574358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.813242 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Jiang, Chen, Jiang, Liu and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Li, Zonglin
Jiang, Huaiwu
Chen, Jin
Jiang, Yifan
Liu, Yi
Xu, Linxia
Comparison of Efficacy Between Transabdominal and Transthoracic Surgical Approaches for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Efficacy Between Transabdominal and Transthoracic Surgical Approaches for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Efficacy Between Transabdominal and Transthoracic Surgical Approaches for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Efficacy Between Transabdominal and Transthoracic Surgical Approaches for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Efficacy Between Transabdominal and Transthoracic Surgical Approaches for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Efficacy Between Transabdominal and Transthoracic Surgical Approaches for Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of efficacy between transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches for siewert type ii adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35574358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.813242
work_keys_str_mv AT lizonglin comparisonofefficacybetweentransabdominalandtransthoracicsurgicalapproachesforsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jianghuaiwu comparisonofefficacybetweentransabdominalandtransthoracicsurgicalapproachesforsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjin comparisonofefficacybetweentransabdominalandtransthoracicsurgicalapproachesforsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangyifan comparisonofefficacybetweentransabdominalandtransthoracicsurgicalapproachesforsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyi comparisonofefficacybetweentransabdominalandtransthoracicsurgicalapproachesforsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xulinxia comparisonofefficacybetweentransabdominalandtransthoracicsurgicalapproachesforsiewerttypeiiadenocarcinomaoftheesophagogastricjunctionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis