Cargando…
Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods
Food classification systems have been proposed to improve food quality criteria. Among these systems, “processing level” has been used as a criterion. NOVA classification, as the denotation “ultra-processed” food (UPF), has been widely used in different countries. However, even though some studies h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091359 |
_version_ | 1784706636659556352 |
---|---|
author | Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana Souza, Melissa B. N. Araujo, Lydia S. Pion, Juliana M. V. Carvalho, Rosemary A. Vanin, Fernanda M. |
author_facet | Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana Souza, Melissa B. N. Araujo, Lydia S. Pion, Juliana M. V. Carvalho, Rosemary A. Vanin, Fernanda M. |
author_sort | Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Food classification systems have been proposed to improve food quality criteria. Among these systems, “processing level” has been used as a criterion. NOVA classification, as the denotation “ultra-processed” food (UPF), has been widely used in different countries. However, even though some studies have pointed out some controversial aspects, no study has evaluated its comprehension by the population where it is used as reference. Therefore, this study explored the understanding of the term UPF for Brazilian consumers, where this denotation has been used in the last 8 years. A questionnaire was used, with questions referring to different aspects of self-assessment of knowledge about UPF. Altogether, 939 valid participants completed the questionnaire, and 81.9% of them declared to know the term UPF. For 78.2%, a better definition for UPF should be “foods that have gone through many processes in industry”. Finally, it was concluded that the term UPF is still confusing for most Brazilians, indicating the risk of use and the urgent necessity to improve the classifications systems and consequently consumer understanding. Only when all parties interested in healthy food work together could this problem be solved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9099562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90995622022-05-14 Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana Souza, Melissa B. N. Araujo, Lydia S. Pion, Juliana M. V. Carvalho, Rosemary A. Vanin, Fernanda M. Foods Article Food classification systems have been proposed to improve food quality criteria. Among these systems, “processing level” has been used as a criterion. NOVA classification, as the denotation “ultra-processed” food (UPF), has been widely used in different countries. However, even though some studies have pointed out some controversial aspects, no study has evaluated its comprehension by the population where it is used as reference. Therefore, this study explored the understanding of the term UPF for Brazilian consumers, where this denotation has been used in the last 8 years. A questionnaire was used, with questions referring to different aspects of self-assessment of knowledge about UPF. Altogether, 939 valid participants completed the questionnaire, and 81.9% of them declared to know the term UPF. For 78.2%, a better definition for UPF should be “foods that have gone through many processes in industry”. Finally, it was concluded that the term UPF is still confusing for most Brazilians, indicating the risk of use and the urgent necessity to improve the classifications systems and consequently consumer understanding. Only when all parties interested in healthy food work together could this problem be solved. MDPI 2022-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9099562/ /pubmed/35564081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091359 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana Souza, Melissa B. N. Araujo, Lydia S. Pion, Juliana M. V. Carvalho, Rosemary A. Vanin, Fernanda M. Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods |
title | Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods |
title_full | Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods |
title_fullStr | Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods |
title_full_unstemmed | Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods |
title_short | Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods |
title_sort | consumers’ understanding of ultra-processed foods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarmientosantosjuliana consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods AT souzamelissabn consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods AT araujolydias consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods AT pionjulianamv consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods AT carvalhorosemarya consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods AT vaninfernandam consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods |