Cargando…

Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods

Food classification systems have been proposed to improve food quality criteria. Among these systems, “processing level” has been used as a criterion. NOVA classification, as the denotation “ultra-processed” food (UPF), has been widely used in different countries. However, even though some studies h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana, Souza, Melissa B. N., Araujo, Lydia S., Pion, Juliana M. V., Carvalho, Rosemary A., Vanin, Fernanda M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091359
_version_ 1784706636659556352
author Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana
Souza, Melissa B. N.
Araujo, Lydia S.
Pion, Juliana M. V.
Carvalho, Rosemary A.
Vanin, Fernanda M.
author_facet Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana
Souza, Melissa B. N.
Araujo, Lydia S.
Pion, Juliana M. V.
Carvalho, Rosemary A.
Vanin, Fernanda M.
author_sort Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana
collection PubMed
description Food classification systems have been proposed to improve food quality criteria. Among these systems, “processing level” has been used as a criterion. NOVA classification, as the denotation “ultra-processed” food (UPF), has been widely used in different countries. However, even though some studies have pointed out some controversial aspects, no study has evaluated its comprehension by the population where it is used as reference. Therefore, this study explored the understanding of the term UPF for Brazilian consumers, where this denotation has been used in the last 8 years. A questionnaire was used, with questions referring to different aspects of self-assessment of knowledge about UPF. Altogether, 939 valid participants completed the questionnaire, and 81.9% of them declared to know the term UPF. For 78.2%, a better definition for UPF should be “foods that have gone through many processes in industry”. Finally, it was concluded that the term UPF is still confusing for most Brazilians, indicating the risk of use and the urgent necessity to improve the classifications systems and consequently consumer understanding. Only when all parties interested in healthy food work together could this problem be solved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9099562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90995622022-05-14 Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana Souza, Melissa B. N. Araujo, Lydia S. Pion, Juliana M. V. Carvalho, Rosemary A. Vanin, Fernanda M. Foods Article Food classification systems have been proposed to improve food quality criteria. Among these systems, “processing level” has been used as a criterion. NOVA classification, as the denotation “ultra-processed” food (UPF), has been widely used in different countries. However, even though some studies have pointed out some controversial aspects, no study has evaluated its comprehension by the population where it is used as reference. Therefore, this study explored the understanding of the term UPF for Brazilian consumers, where this denotation has been used in the last 8 years. A questionnaire was used, with questions referring to different aspects of self-assessment of knowledge about UPF. Altogether, 939 valid participants completed the questionnaire, and 81.9% of them declared to know the term UPF. For 78.2%, a better definition for UPF should be “foods that have gone through many processes in industry”. Finally, it was concluded that the term UPF is still confusing for most Brazilians, indicating the risk of use and the urgent necessity to improve the classifications systems and consequently consumer understanding. Only when all parties interested in healthy food work together could this problem be solved. MDPI 2022-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9099562/ /pubmed/35564081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091359 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sarmiento-Santos, Juliana
Souza, Melissa B. N.
Araujo, Lydia S.
Pion, Juliana M. V.
Carvalho, Rosemary A.
Vanin, Fernanda M.
Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods
title Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods
title_full Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods
title_fullStr Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods
title_full_unstemmed Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods
title_short Consumers’ Understanding of Ultra-Processed Foods
title_sort consumers’ understanding of ultra-processed foods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11091359
work_keys_str_mv AT sarmientosantosjuliana consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods
AT souzamelissabn consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods
AT araujolydias consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods
AT pionjulianamv consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods
AT carvalhorosemarya consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods
AT vaninfernandam consumersunderstandingofultraprocessedfoods