Cargando…

Cancers and COVID-19 Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: During the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer patients are regarded as a highly vulnerable population. Given the unavoidable bias and unmeasured confounders in observational studies, the causal effects of cancers on COVID-19 outcomes are largely unknown. In the study, we tried to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zengbin, Wei, Yudong, Zhu, Guixian, Wang, Mengjie, Zhang, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092086
_version_ 1784706712799805440
author Li, Zengbin
Wei, Yudong
Zhu, Guixian
Wang, Mengjie
Zhang, Lei
author_facet Li, Zengbin
Wei, Yudong
Zhu, Guixian
Wang, Mengjie
Zhang, Lei
author_sort Li, Zengbin
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: During the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer patients are regarded as a highly vulnerable population. Given the unavoidable bias and unmeasured confounders in observational studies, the causal effects of cancers on COVID-19 outcomes are largely unknown. In the study, we tried to evaluate the causal effects of cancers on COVID-19 outcomes using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. No strong evidence was observed to support a causal role of cancer in COVID-19 development. Previous observational correlations between cancers and COVID-19 outcomes were likely confounded. Large and well-conducted epidemiological studies are required to determine whether cancers causally contribute to increased risk of COVID-19. ABSTRACT: Observational studies have shown increased COVID-19 risk among cancer patients, but the causality has not been proven yet. Mendelian randomization analysis can use the genetic variants, independently of confounders, to obtain causal estimates which are considerably less confounded. We aimed to investigate the causal associations of cancers with COVID-19 outcomes using the MR analysis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was employed as the primary analysis. Sensitivity analyses and multivariable MR analyses were conducted. Notably, IVW analysis of univariable MR revealed that overall cancer and twelve site-specific cancers had no causal association with COVID-19 severity, hospitalization or susceptibility. The corresponding p-values for the casual associations were all statistically insignificant: overall cancer (p = 0.34; p = 0.42; p = 0.69), lung cancer (p = 0.60; p = 0.37; p = 0.96), breast cancer (p = 0.43; p = 0.74; p = 0.43), endometrial cancer (p = 0.79; p = 0.24; p = 0.83), prostate cancer (p = 0.54; p = 0.17; p = 0.58), thyroid cancer (p = 0.70; p = 0.80; p = 0.28), ovarian cancer (p = 0.62; p = 0.96; p = 0.93), melanoma (p = 0.79; p = 0.45; p = 0.82), small bowel cancer (p = 0.09; p = 0.08; p = 0.19), colorectal cancer (p = 0.85; p = 0.79; p = 0.30), oropharyngeal cancer (p = 0.31; not applicable, NA; p = 0.80), lymphoma (p = 0.51; NA; p = 0.37) and cervical cancer (p = 0.25; p = 0.32; p = 0.68). Sensitivity analyses and multivariable MR analyses yielded similar results. In conclusion, cancers might have no causal effect on increasing COVID-19 risk. Further large-scale population studies are needed to validate our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9099868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90998682022-05-14 Cancers and COVID-19 Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study Li, Zengbin Wei, Yudong Zhu, Guixian Wang, Mengjie Zhang, Lei Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: During the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer patients are regarded as a highly vulnerable population. Given the unavoidable bias and unmeasured confounders in observational studies, the causal effects of cancers on COVID-19 outcomes are largely unknown. In the study, we tried to evaluate the causal effects of cancers on COVID-19 outcomes using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. No strong evidence was observed to support a causal role of cancer in COVID-19 development. Previous observational correlations between cancers and COVID-19 outcomes were likely confounded. Large and well-conducted epidemiological studies are required to determine whether cancers causally contribute to increased risk of COVID-19. ABSTRACT: Observational studies have shown increased COVID-19 risk among cancer patients, but the causality has not been proven yet. Mendelian randomization analysis can use the genetic variants, independently of confounders, to obtain causal estimates which are considerably less confounded. We aimed to investigate the causal associations of cancers with COVID-19 outcomes using the MR analysis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was employed as the primary analysis. Sensitivity analyses and multivariable MR analyses were conducted. Notably, IVW analysis of univariable MR revealed that overall cancer and twelve site-specific cancers had no causal association with COVID-19 severity, hospitalization or susceptibility. The corresponding p-values for the casual associations were all statistically insignificant: overall cancer (p = 0.34; p = 0.42; p = 0.69), lung cancer (p = 0.60; p = 0.37; p = 0.96), breast cancer (p = 0.43; p = 0.74; p = 0.43), endometrial cancer (p = 0.79; p = 0.24; p = 0.83), prostate cancer (p = 0.54; p = 0.17; p = 0.58), thyroid cancer (p = 0.70; p = 0.80; p = 0.28), ovarian cancer (p = 0.62; p = 0.96; p = 0.93), melanoma (p = 0.79; p = 0.45; p = 0.82), small bowel cancer (p = 0.09; p = 0.08; p = 0.19), colorectal cancer (p = 0.85; p = 0.79; p = 0.30), oropharyngeal cancer (p = 0.31; not applicable, NA; p = 0.80), lymphoma (p = 0.51; NA; p = 0.37) and cervical cancer (p = 0.25; p = 0.32; p = 0.68). Sensitivity analyses and multivariable MR analyses yielded similar results. In conclusion, cancers might have no causal effect on increasing COVID-19 risk. Further large-scale population studies are needed to validate our findings. MDPI 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9099868/ /pubmed/35565215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092086 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Zengbin
Wei, Yudong
Zhu, Guixian
Wang, Mengjie
Zhang, Lei
Cancers and COVID-19 Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title Cancers and COVID-19 Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_full Cancers and COVID-19 Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_fullStr Cancers and COVID-19 Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_full_unstemmed Cancers and COVID-19 Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_short Cancers and COVID-19 Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study
title_sort cancers and covid-19 risk: a mendelian randomization study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092086
work_keys_str_mv AT lizengbin cancersandcovid19riskamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT weiyudong cancersandcovid19riskamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT zhuguixian cancersandcovid19riskamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT wangmengjie cancersandcovid19riskamendelianrandomizationstudy
AT zhanglei cancersandcovid19riskamendelianrandomizationstudy