Cargando…
Root and Root Canal Configuration Characterization Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review
This systematic review’s objective was to conduct a complete analysis of the literature on the root canal morphology using advanced micro-computed tomography. The electronic web databases PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were examined for research papers concerning the chosen keywords, evaluating the ro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092287 |
_version_ | 1784706744926076928 |
---|---|
author | Karobari, Mohmed Isaqali Arshad, Sohaib Noorani, Tahir Yusuf Ahmed, Naveed Basheer, Syed Nahid Peeran, Syed Wali Marya, Anand Marya, Charu Mohan Messina, Pietro Scardina, Giuseppe Alessandro |
author_facet | Karobari, Mohmed Isaqali Arshad, Sohaib Noorani, Tahir Yusuf Ahmed, Naveed Basheer, Syed Nahid Peeran, Syed Wali Marya, Anand Marya, Charu Mohan Messina, Pietro Scardina, Giuseppe Alessandro |
author_sort | Karobari, Mohmed Isaqali |
collection | PubMed |
description | This systematic review’s objective was to conduct a complete analysis of the literature on the root canal morphology using advanced micro-computed tomography. The electronic web databases PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were examined for research papers concerning the chosen keywords, evaluating the root canal morphology using Micro-CT, published up to 2021. The articles were searched using MeSH keywords and searched digitally on four specialty journal websites. DARE2 extended (Database of Attributes of Reviews of Effects) was used to assess bias risk. The information was gathered from 18 published studies that strictly met the criteria for inclusion. In the included studies, a total of 6696 samples were studied. The studies were conducted on either maxillary (n-2222) or mandibular teeth (n-3760), permanent anteriors (n-625), and Third molars (n-89). To scan samples, a Scanco Medical machine in was used in 10 studies, Bruker Micro-CT in 34, and seven other machines were utilized in the rest. Bruker Micro-CT software from Kontich, Belgium, VG-Studio Max 2.2 software from Volume Graphics, Heidelberg, Germany, was the most commonly used software. The minimum Voxel size (resolution) adopted in the included studies was 11.6 µm. However, 60 µm was the maximum. Most studies classified the root canal morphology using Vertucci’s classification system (n-16) and the four-digit system (n-6). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9099997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90999972022-05-14 Root and Root Canal Configuration Characterization Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review Karobari, Mohmed Isaqali Arshad, Sohaib Noorani, Tahir Yusuf Ahmed, Naveed Basheer, Syed Nahid Peeran, Syed Wali Marya, Anand Marya, Charu Mohan Messina, Pietro Scardina, Giuseppe Alessandro J Clin Med Article This systematic review’s objective was to conduct a complete analysis of the literature on the root canal morphology using advanced micro-computed tomography. The electronic web databases PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane were examined for research papers concerning the chosen keywords, evaluating the root canal morphology using Micro-CT, published up to 2021. The articles were searched using MeSH keywords and searched digitally on four specialty journal websites. DARE2 extended (Database of Attributes of Reviews of Effects) was used to assess bias risk. The information was gathered from 18 published studies that strictly met the criteria for inclusion. In the included studies, a total of 6696 samples were studied. The studies were conducted on either maxillary (n-2222) or mandibular teeth (n-3760), permanent anteriors (n-625), and Third molars (n-89). To scan samples, a Scanco Medical machine in was used in 10 studies, Bruker Micro-CT in 34, and seven other machines were utilized in the rest. Bruker Micro-CT software from Kontich, Belgium, VG-Studio Max 2.2 software from Volume Graphics, Heidelberg, Germany, was the most commonly used software. The minimum Voxel size (resolution) adopted in the included studies was 11.6 µm. However, 60 µm was the maximum. Most studies classified the root canal morphology using Vertucci’s classification system (n-16) and the four-digit system (n-6). MDPI 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9099997/ /pubmed/35566414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092287 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Karobari, Mohmed Isaqali Arshad, Sohaib Noorani, Tahir Yusuf Ahmed, Naveed Basheer, Syed Nahid Peeran, Syed Wali Marya, Anand Marya, Charu Mohan Messina, Pietro Scardina, Giuseppe Alessandro Root and Root Canal Configuration Characterization Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review |
title | Root and Root Canal Configuration Characterization Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Root and Root Canal Configuration Characterization Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Root and Root Canal Configuration Characterization Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Root and Root Canal Configuration Characterization Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Root and Root Canal Configuration Characterization Using Microcomputed Tomography: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | root and root canal configuration characterization using microcomputed tomography: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9099997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karobarimohmedisaqali rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT arshadsohaib rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT nooranitahiryusuf rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT ahmednaveed rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT basheersyednahid rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT peeransyedwali rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT maryaanand rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT maryacharumohan rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT messinapietro rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview AT scardinagiuseppealessandro rootandrootcanalconfigurationcharacterizationusingmicrocomputedtomographyasystematicreview |