Cargando…

Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers

Orthodontic retention is the final important stage of orthodontic treatment, the aim of which is to consolidate the functional and aesthetic position of teeth. Among adults, fixed retainers made of different types of wires are the most common. The aim of this study was to analyse the mechanical prop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firlej, Marcel, Zaborowicz, Katarzyna, Zaborowicz, Maciej, Firlej, Ewa, Domagała, Ivo, Pieniak, Daniel, Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna, Dmowski, Artur, Biedziak, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565167
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095775
_version_ 1784706843562475520
author Firlej, Marcel
Zaborowicz, Katarzyna
Zaborowicz, Maciej
Firlej, Ewa
Domagała, Ivo
Pieniak, Daniel
Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna
Dmowski, Artur
Biedziak, Barbara
author_facet Firlej, Marcel
Zaborowicz, Katarzyna
Zaborowicz, Maciej
Firlej, Ewa
Domagała, Ivo
Pieniak, Daniel
Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna
Dmowski, Artur
Biedziak, Barbara
author_sort Firlej, Marcel
collection PubMed
description Orthodontic retention is the final important stage of orthodontic treatment, the aim of which is to consolidate the functional and aesthetic position of teeth. Among adults, fixed retainers made of different types of wires are the most common. The aim of this study was to analyse the mechanical properties of a new generation of fixed orthodontic retainers—printed by 3D printers. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using samples made of Nextdent MFH C&B N1 resin in the form of cuboid bars with nominal dimensions of width b = 3 mm, thickness d = 0.8 mm; 1 mm; 1.2 mm, length l = 30 mm for each type. The influence of the thickness of the retainers on their strength under loaded conditions was evaluated. Flexural strength, elastic properties, deflection, and creep were compared. The samples were aged in an artificial saliva bath at 37 ± 1 °C during the strength tests. Results: It was shown that differences in the thickness of the samples affected their elastic and strength properties. The highest average flexural modulus, the highest deflection, creep, and strength was characteristic of the samples with the highest thickness (1.2 mm). Samples with an average thickness of 1 mm had the lowest modulus of elasticity. Conclusions: The mechanical properties of 3D printed retainers show that they can be an alternative to metal retainers and the procedure of making new retainers, especially when patients have aesthetic requirements or allergies to metals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9100403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91004032022-05-14 Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers Firlej, Marcel Zaborowicz, Katarzyna Zaborowicz, Maciej Firlej, Ewa Domagała, Ivo Pieniak, Daniel Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna Dmowski, Artur Biedziak, Barbara Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Orthodontic retention is the final important stage of orthodontic treatment, the aim of which is to consolidate the functional and aesthetic position of teeth. Among adults, fixed retainers made of different types of wires are the most common. The aim of this study was to analyse the mechanical properties of a new generation of fixed orthodontic retainers—printed by 3D printers. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using samples made of Nextdent MFH C&B N1 resin in the form of cuboid bars with nominal dimensions of width b = 3 mm, thickness d = 0.8 mm; 1 mm; 1.2 mm, length l = 30 mm for each type. The influence of the thickness of the retainers on their strength under loaded conditions was evaluated. Flexural strength, elastic properties, deflection, and creep were compared. The samples were aged in an artificial saliva bath at 37 ± 1 °C during the strength tests. Results: It was shown that differences in the thickness of the samples affected their elastic and strength properties. The highest average flexural modulus, the highest deflection, creep, and strength was characteristic of the samples with the highest thickness (1.2 mm). Samples with an average thickness of 1 mm had the lowest modulus of elasticity. Conclusions: The mechanical properties of 3D printed retainers show that they can be an alternative to metal retainers and the procedure of making new retainers, especially when patients have aesthetic requirements or allergies to metals. MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9100403/ /pubmed/35565167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095775 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Firlej, Marcel
Zaborowicz, Katarzyna
Zaborowicz, Maciej
Firlej, Ewa
Domagała, Ivo
Pieniak, Daniel
Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna
Dmowski, Artur
Biedziak, Barbara
Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers
title Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers
title_full Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers
title_fullStr Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers
title_short Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers
title_sort mechanical properties of 3d printed orthodontic retainers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565167
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095775
work_keys_str_mv AT firlejmarcel mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers
AT zaborowiczkatarzyna mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers
AT zaborowiczmaciej mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers
AT firlejewa mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers
AT domagałaivo mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers
AT pieniakdaniel mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers
AT igielskakalwatjoanna mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers
AT dmowskiartur mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers
AT biedziakbarbara mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers