Cargando…
Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers
Orthodontic retention is the final important stage of orthodontic treatment, the aim of which is to consolidate the functional and aesthetic position of teeth. Among adults, fixed retainers made of different types of wires are the most common. The aim of this study was to analyse the mechanical prop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095775 |
_version_ | 1784706843562475520 |
---|---|
author | Firlej, Marcel Zaborowicz, Katarzyna Zaborowicz, Maciej Firlej, Ewa Domagała, Ivo Pieniak, Daniel Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna Dmowski, Artur Biedziak, Barbara |
author_facet | Firlej, Marcel Zaborowicz, Katarzyna Zaborowicz, Maciej Firlej, Ewa Domagała, Ivo Pieniak, Daniel Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna Dmowski, Artur Biedziak, Barbara |
author_sort | Firlej, Marcel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Orthodontic retention is the final important stage of orthodontic treatment, the aim of which is to consolidate the functional and aesthetic position of teeth. Among adults, fixed retainers made of different types of wires are the most common. The aim of this study was to analyse the mechanical properties of a new generation of fixed orthodontic retainers—printed by 3D printers. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using samples made of Nextdent MFH C&B N1 resin in the form of cuboid bars with nominal dimensions of width b = 3 mm, thickness d = 0.8 mm; 1 mm; 1.2 mm, length l = 30 mm for each type. The influence of the thickness of the retainers on their strength under loaded conditions was evaluated. Flexural strength, elastic properties, deflection, and creep were compared. The samples were aged in an artificial saliva bath at 37 ± 1 °C during the strength tests. Results: It was shown that differences in the thickness of the samples affected their elastic and strength properties. The highest average flexural modulus, the highest deflection, creep, and strength was characteristic of the samples with the highest thickness (1.2 mm). Samples with an average thickness of 1 mm had the lowest modulus of elasticity. Conclusions: The mechanical properties of 3D printed retainers show that they can be an alternative to metal retainers and the procedure of making new retainers, especially when patients have aesthetic requirements or allergies to metals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9100403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91004032022-05-14 Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers Firlej, Marcel Zaborowicz, Katarzyna Zaborowicz, Maciej Firlej, Ewa Domagała, Ivo Pieniak, Daniel Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna Dmowski, Artur Biedziak, Barbara Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Orthodontic retention is the final important stage of orthodontic treatment, the aim of which is to consolidate the functional and aesthetic position of teeth. Among adults, fixed retainers made of different types of wires are the most common. The aim of this study was to analyse the mechanical properties of a new generation of fixed orthodontic retainers—printed by 3D printers. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using samples made of Nextdent MFH C&B N1 resin in the form of cuboid bars with nominal dimensions of width b = 3 mm, thickness d = 0.8 mm; 1 mm; 1.2 mm, length l = 30 mm for each type. The influence of the thickness of the retainers on their strength under loaded conditions was evaluated. Flexural strength, elastic properties, deflection, and creep were compared. The samples were aged in an artificial saliva bath at 37 ± 1 °C during the strength tests. Results: It was shown that differences in the thickness of the samples affected their elastic and strength properties. The highest average flexural modulus, the highest deflection, creep, and strength was characteristic of the samples with the highest thickness (1.2 mm). Samples with an average thickness of 1 mm had the lowest modulus of elasticity. Conclusions: The mechanical properties of 3D printed retainers show that they can be an alternative to metal retainers and the procedure of making new retainers, especially when patients have aesthetic requirements or allergies to metals. MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9100403/ /pubmed/35565167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095775 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Firlej, Marcel Zaborowicz, Katarzyna Zaborowicz, Maciej Firlej, Ewa Domagała, Ivo Pieniak, Daniel Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna Dmowski, Artur Biedziak, Barbara Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers |
title | Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers |
title_full | Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers |
title_fullStr | Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers |
title_short | Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers |
title_sort | mechanical properties of 3d printed orthodontic retainers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095775 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT firlejmarcel mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers AT zaborowiczkatarzyna mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers AT zaborowiczmaciej mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers AT firlejewa mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers AT domagałaivo mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers AT pieniakdaniel mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers AT igielskakalwatjoanna mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers AT dmowskiartur mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers AT biedziakbarbara mechanicalpropertiesof3dprintedorthodonticretainers |