Cargando…

Cochlear Implant Awareness: Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure

BACKGROUND: Surgical success of cochlear implantation is usually measured through speech perception and quality of life questionnaires. Although these questionnaires cover a broad spectrum of domains, they do not evaluate the consciousness of wearing a cochlear implant (CI) and how this impacts the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markodimitraki, Laura M., Stegeman, Inge, Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573281
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.830768
_version_ 1784706846067523584
author Markodimitraki, Laura M.
Stegeman, Inge
Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
author_facet Markodimitraki, Laura M.
Stegeman, Inge
Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
author_sort Markodimitraki, Laura M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical success of cochlear implantation is usually measured through speech perception and quality of life questionnaires. Although these questionnaires cover a broad spectrum of domains, they do not evaluate the consciousness of wearing a cochlear implant (CI) and how this impacts the daily life of patients. To evaluate this concept we aimed to develop and validate a standardized patient reported outcome measure (PROM) for use in cochlear implant users. METHODS: Development and evaluation of the COchlear iMPlant AwareneSS (COMPASS) questionnaire was realized following the COSMIN guidelines in three phases: (1) item generation, (2) qualitative pilot study to ensure relevance, comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and face validity, and (3) quantitative survey study for the assessment of reliability (test-retest) with 54 participants. RESULTS: Nine domains of CI awareness were identified through literature research and interviews with experts and patients. These resulted in the formulation of 18 items which were tested with a pilot study, after which 3 items were deleted. The final 15-item COMPASS questionnaire proved to have good validity and satisfactory reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient calculated for items with continuous variables ranged from 0.66 to 0.89 with seven out of eight items scoring above the acceptable level of 0.7. The Cohen’s kappa calculated for items with nominal variables ranged from −0.4 to 0.78 with 11 (sub)items out of 15 scoring above fair to good agreement. Measurement error analysis for items with continuous variables showed a mean difference of −2.18 to 0.22. The calculated 95% limits of agreement for these items revealed no statistically significant difference between the two administered questionnaires. For items with nominal variables, the percentages of agreement calculated, ranged between 0 and 95%, and 83.3 and 96.6% for positive and negative agreement, respectively. CONCLUSION: The COMPASS questionnaire is a valid and reliable PROM for evaluating the cochlear implant awareness, and it can be easily used in routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9100413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91004132022-05-14 Cochlear Implant Awareness: Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure Markodimitraki, Laura M. Stegeman, Inge Thomeer, Hans G. X. M. Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Surgical success of cochlear implantation is usually measured through speech perception and quality of life questionnaires. Although these questionnaires cover a broad spectrum of domains, they do not evaluate the consciousness of wearing a cochlear implant (CI) and how this impacts the daily life of patients. To evaluate this concept we aimed to develop and validate a standardized patient reported outcome measure (PROM) for use in cochlear implant users. METHODS: Development and evaluation of the COchlear iMPlant AwareneSS (COMPASS) questionnaire was realized following the COSMIN guidelines in three phases: (1) item generation, (2) qualitative pilot study to ensure relevance, comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and face validity, and (3) quantitative survey study for the assessment of reliability (test-retest) with 54 participants. RESULTS: Nine domains of CI awareness were identified through literature research and interviews with experts and patients. These resulted in the formulation of 18 items which were tested with a pilot study, after which 3 items were deleted. The final 15-item COMPASS questionnaire proved to have good validity and satisfactory reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient calculated for items with continuous variables ranged from 0.66 to 0.89 with seven out of eight items scoring above the acceptable level of 0.7. The Cohen’s kappa calculated for items with nominal variables ranged from −0.4 to 0.78 with 11 (sub)items out of 15 scoring above fair to good agreement. Measurement error analysis for items with continuous variables showed a mean difference of −2.18 to 0.22. The calculated 95% limits of agreement for these items revealed no statistically significant difference between the two administered questionnaires. For items with nominal variables, the percentages of agreement calculated, ranged between 0 and 95%, and 83.3 and 96.6% for positive and negative agreement, respectively. CONCLUSION: The COMPASS questionnaire is a valid and reliable PROM for evaluating the cochlear implant awareness, and it can be easily used in routine clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9100413/ /pubmed/35573281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.830768 Text en Copyright © 2022 Markodimitraki, Stegeman and Thomeer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Markodimitraki, Laura M.
Stegeman, Inge
Thomeer, Hans G. X. M.
Cochlear Implant Awareness: Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure
title Cochlear Implant Awareness: Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure
title_full Cochlear Implant Awareness: Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure
title_fullStr Cochlear Implant Awareness: Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure
title_full_unstemmed Cochlear Implant Awareness: Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure
title_short Cochlear Implant Awareness: Development and Validation of a Patient Reported Outcome Measure
title_sort cochlear implant awareness: development and validation of a patient reported outcome measure
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35573281
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.830768
work_keys_str_mv AT markodimitrakilauram cochlearimplantawarenessdevelopmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure
AT stegemaninge cochlearimplantawarenessdevelopmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure
AT thomeerhansgxm cochlearimplantawarenessdevelopmentandvalidationofapatientreportedoutcomemeasure