Cargando…

Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma

PURPOSE: Scleral stiffening may protect against glaucomatous retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss or dysfunction associated with ocular hypertension. Here, we assess the potential neuroprotective effects of two treatments designed to stiffen either the entire posterior sclera or only the sclera adjacent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerberich, Brandon G., Hannon, Bailey G., Brown, Dillon M., Read, A. Thomas, Ritch, Matthew D., Schrader Echeverri, Elisa, Nichols, Lauren, Potnis, Cahil, Sridhar, Sreesh, Toothman, Maya G., Schwaner, Stephen A., Winger, Erin J., Huang, Hannah, Gershon, Gabby S., Feola, Andrew J., Pardue, Machelle T., Prausnitz, Mark R., Ethier, C. Ross
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.5.7
_version_ 1784706856370831360
author Gerberich, Brandon G.
Hannon, Bailey G.
Brown, Dillon M.
Read, A. Thomas
Ritch, Matthew D.
Schrader Echeverri, Elisa
Nichols, Lauren
Potnis, Cahil
Sridhar, Sreesh
Toothman, Maya G.
Schwaner, Stephen A.
Winger, Erin J.
Huang, Hannah
Gershon, Gabby S.
Feola, Andrew J.
Pardue, Machelle T.
Prausnitz, Mark R.
Ethier, C. Ross
author_facet Gerberich, Brandon G.
Hannon, Bailey G.
Brown, Dillon M.
Read, A. Thomas
Ritch, Matthew D.
Schrader Echeverri, Elisa
Nichols, Lauren
Potnis, Cahil
Sridhar, Sreesh
Toothman, Maya G.
Schwaner, Stephen A.
Winger, Erin J.
Huang, Hannah
Gershon, Gabby S.
Feola, Andrew J.
Pardue, Machelle T.
Prausnitz, Mark R.
Ethier, C. Ross
author_sort Gerberich, Brandon G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Scleral stiffening may protect against glaucomatous retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss or dysfunction associated with ocular hypertension. Here, we assess the potential neuroprotective effects of two treatments designed to stiffen either the entire posterior sclera or only the sclera adjacent to the peripapillary sclera in an experimental model of glaucoma. METHODS: Rat sclerae were stiffened in vivo using either genipin (crosslinking the entire posterior sclera) or a regionally selective photosensitizer, methylene blue (stiffening only the juxtaperipapillary region surrounding the optic nerve). Ocular hypertension was induced using magnetic microbeads delivered to the anterior chamber. Morphological and functional outcomes, including optic nerve axon count and appearance, retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography, optomotor response, and electroretinography traces, were assessed. RESULTS: Both local (juxtaperipapillary) and global (whole posterior) scleral stiffening treatments were successful at increasing scleral stiffness, but neither provided demonstrable neuroprotection in hypertensive eyes as assessed by RGC axon counts and appearance, optomotor response, or electroretinography. There was a weak indication that scleral crosslinking protected against retinal thinning as assessed by optical coherence tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Scleral stiffening was not demonstrated to be neuroprotective in ocular hypertensive rats. We hypothesize that the absence of benefit may in part be due to RGC loss associated with the scleral stiffening agents themselves (mild in the case of genipin, and moderate in the case of methylene blue), negating any potential benefit of scleral stiffening. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The development of scleral stiffening as a neuroprotective treatment will require the identification of better tolerated stiffening protocols and further preclinical testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9100482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91004822022-05-14 Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma Gerberich, Brandon G. Hannon, Bailey G. Brown, Dillon M. Read, A. Thomas Ritch, Matthew D. Schrader Echeverri, Elisa Nichols, Lauren Potnis, Cahil Sridhar, Sreesh Toothman, Maya G. Schwaner, Stephen A. Winger, Erin J. Huang, Hannah Gershon, Gabby S. Feola, Andrew J. Pardue, Machelle T. Prausnitz, Mark R. Ethier, C. Ross Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: Scleral stiffening may protect against glaucomatous retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss or dysfunction associated with ocular hypertension. Here, we assess the potential neuroprotective effects of two treatments designed to stiffen either the entire posterior sclera or only the sclera adjacent to the peripapillary sclera in an experimental model of glaucoma. METHODS: Rat sclerae were stiffened in vivo using either genipin (crosslinking the entire posterior sclera) or a regionally selective photosensitizer, methylene blue (stiffening only the juxtaperipapillary region surrounding the optic nerve). Ocular hypertension was induced using magnetic microbeads delivered to the anterior chamber. Morphological and functional outcomes, including optic nerve axon count and appearance, retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography, optomotor response, and electroretinography traces, were assessed. RESULTS: Both local (juxtaperipapillary) and global (whole posterior) scleral stiffening treatments were successful at increasing scleral stiffness, but neither provided demonstrable neuroprotection in hypertensive eyes as assessed by RGC axon counts and appearance, optomotor response, or electroretinography. There was a weak indication that scleral crosslinking protected against retinal thinning as assessed by optical coherence tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Scleral stiffening was not demonstrated to be neuroprotective in ocular hypertensive rats. We hypothesize that the absence of benefit may in part be due to RGC loss associated with the scleral stiffening agents themselves (mild in the case of genipin, and moderate in the case of methylene blue), negating any potential benefit of scleral stiffening. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The development of scleral stiffening as a neuroprotective treatment will require the identification of better tolerated stiffening protocols and further preclinical testing. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9100482/ /pubmed/35536721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.5.7 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Gerberich, Brandon G.
Hannon, Bailey G.
Brown, Dillon M.
Read, A. Thomas
Ritch, Matthew D.
Schrader Echeverri, Elisa
Nichols, Lauren
Potnis, Cahil
Sridhar, Sreesh
Toothman, Maya G.
Schwaner, Stephen A.
Winger, Erin J.
Huang, Hannah
Gershon, Gabby S.
Feola, Andrew J.
Pardue, Machelle T.
Prausnitz, Mark R.
Ethier, C. Ross
Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma
title Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma
title_full Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma
title_fullStr Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma
title_short Evaluation of Spatially Targeted Scleral Stiffening on Neuroprotection in a Rat Model of Glaucoma
title_sort evaluation of spatially targeted scleral stiffening on neuroprotection in a rat model of glaucoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.5.7
work_keys_str_mv AT gerberichbrandong evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT hannonbaileyg evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT browndillonm evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT readathomas evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT ritchmatthewd evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT schraderecheverrielisa evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT nicholslauren evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT potniscahil evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT sridharsreesh evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT toothmanmayag evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT schwanerstephena evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT wingererinj evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT huanghannah evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT gershongabbys evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT feolaandrewj evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT parduemachellet evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT prausnitzmarkr evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma
AT ethiercross evaluationofspatiallytargetedscleralstiffeningonneuroprotectioninaratmodelofglaucoma