Cargando…

Antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery ectasia and acute myocardial infarction: A case report

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE). CASE SUMMARY: This case reports the dynamic observation of a patient for 48 mo after a diagnosis of CAE with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The first antithrombotic agents...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Rui-Feng, Gao, Xiang-Yu, Liang, Si-Wen, Zhao, Hui-Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647140
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3936
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE). CASE SUMMARY: This case reports the dynamic observation of a patient for 48 mo after a diagnosis of CAE with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The first antithrombotic agents used were aspirin (100 mg/d) and clopidogrel (75 mg/d). During the sixth month of observation, a second AMI occurred involving the same culprit vessel; therefore, antithrombotic agents were changed to aspirin (100 mg/d) and ticagrelor (90 mg twice per day). Twelve months after the second AMI, an attempt to reduce the dosage ticagrelor failed; therefore the original dose was continued. The CAE was relatively stable during the following 4 years. CONCLUSION: This case indicates that a combination of aspirin and ticagrelor may be more effective for CAE patients with AMI than aspirin and clopidogrel.