Cargando…
Antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery ectasia and acute myocardial infarction: A case report
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE). CASE SUMMARY: This case reports the dynamic observation of a patient for 48 mo after a diagnosis of CAE with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The first antithrombotic agents...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9100716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35647140 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3936 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the antithrombotic treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery ectasia (CAE). CASE SUMMARY: This case reports the dynamic observation of a patient for 48 mo after a diagnosis of CAE with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The first antithrombotic agents used were aspirin (100 mg/d) and clopidogrel (75 mg/d). During the sixth month of observation, a second AMI occurred involving the same culprit vessel; therefore, antithrombotic agents were changed to aspirin (100 mg/d) and ticagrelor (90 mg twice per day). Twelve months after the second AMI, an attempt to reduce the dosage ticagrelor failed; therefore the original dose was continued. The CAE was relatively stable during the following 4 years. CONCLUSION: This case indicates that a combination of aspirin and ticagrelor may be more effective for CAE patients with AMI than aspirin and clopidogrel. |
---|