Cargando…
Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study
Background and Objectives: Shoulder dystocia (ShD) is one of most dangerous obstetric complication. The objective of this study was to determine if the ultrasonographic fetal biacromial diameter (BA) and derived parameters could predict ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Materials and Methods: W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095747 |
_version_ | 1784707091914555392 |
---|---|
author | La Verde, Marco De Franciscis, Pasquale Torre, Clelia Celardo, Angela Grassini, Giulia Papa, Rossella Cianci, Stefano Capristo, Carlo Morlando, Maddalena Riemma, Gaetano |
author_facet | La Verde, Marco De Franciscis, Pasquale Torre, Clelia Celardo, Angela Grassini, Giulia Papa, Rossella Cianci, Stefano Capristo, Carlo Morlando, Maddalena Riemma, Gaetano |
author_sort | La Verde, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: Shoulder dystocia (ShD) is one of most dangerous obstetric complication. The objective of this study was to determine if the ultrasonographic fetal biacromial diameter (BA) and derived parameters could predict ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary care university hospital from March 2021 to February 2022. We included all full-term pregnancies accepted for delivery that received an accurate ultrasonography (USG) scan before delivery. USG biometry and estimated fetal weight (EFW) were collected. Therefore, we evaluated the diameter of the mid-arm, the transverse thoracic diameter (TTD) and the biacromial diameter (BA). BA was estimated using Youssef’s formula: TTD + 2 mid-arm diameters. The primary outcome was the evaluation of BA and its related parameters (BA/biparietal diameter (BPD), BA/head circumference (HC) and BA–BPD in fetuses with ShD versus fetuses without ShD. Diagnostic accuracy for ShD of BA, BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA–BPD was evaluated using receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. Results: 90 women were included in the analysis, four of these had ShD and required extra maneuvers after head delivery. BA was increased in fetuses with ShD (150.4 cm; 95% CI 133.2 cm to 167.6 cm) compared to no-ShD (133.5 cm; 95% CI 130.1 cm to 137.0 cm; p = 0.04). Significant differences were also found between ShD and no-ShD groups for BA/BPD (1.66 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.86) vs. 1.44 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.48); p = 0.04), BA/HC (0.45 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.49) vs. 0.39 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.40); p = 0.01), BA–BPD (60.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 77.6 cm) vs. 41.4 (95% CI 38.2 to 44.6); p = 0.03), respectively. ROC analysis showed an overall good accuracy for ShD, with an AUC of 0.821 (p = 0.001) for BA alone and 0.881 (p = 0.001), 0.857 (p = 0.016) and 0.867 (p = 0.013) for BA/BPD, BA–BPD and BA/HC, respectively. Conclusions: BA alone, as well as BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA–BPD might be useful predictors of ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. However, such evidence needs extensive confirmation by means of additional studies with large sample sizes, especially in case of pregnancies at high risk for ShD (i.e., gestational diabetes). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9101462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91014622022-05-14 Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study La Verde, Marco De Franciscis, Pasquale Torre, Clelia Celardo, Angela Grassini, Giulia Papa, Rossella Cianci, Stefano Capristo, Carlo Morlando, Maddalena Riemma, Gaetano Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background and Objectives: Shoulder dystocia (ShD) is one of most dangerous obstetric complication. The objective of this study was to determine if the ultrasonographic fetal biacromial diameter (BA) and derived parameters could predict ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary care university hospital from March 2021 to February 2022. We included all full-term pregnancies accepted for delivery that received an accurate ultrasonography (USG) scan before delivery. USG biometry and estimated fetal weight (EFW) were collected. Therefore, we evaluated the diameter of the mid-arm, the transverse thoracic diameter (TTD) and the biacromial diameter (BA). BA was estimated using Youssef’s formula: TTD + 2 mid-arm diameters. The primary outcome was the evaluation of BA and its related parameters (BA/biparietal diameter (BPD), BA/head circumference (HC) and BA–BPD in fetuses with ShD versus fetuses without ShD. Diagnostic accuracy for ShD of BA, BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA–BPD was evaluated using receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. Results: 90 women were included in the analysis, four of these had ShD and required extra maneuvers after head delivery. BA was increased in fetuses with ShD (150.4 cm; 95% CI 133.2 cm to 167.6 cm) compared to no-ShD (133.5 cm; 95% CI 130.1 cm to 137.0 cm; p = 0.04). Significant differences were also found between ShD and no-ShD groups for BA/BPD (1.66 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.86) vs. 1.44 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.48); p = 0.04), BA/HC (0.45 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.49) vs. 0.39 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.40); p = 0.01), BA–BPD (60.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 77.6 cm) vs. 41.4 (95% CI 38.2 to 44.6); p = 0.03), respectively. ROC analysis showed an overall good accuracy for ShD, with an AUC of 0.821 (p = 0.001) for BA alone and 0.881 (p = 0.001), 0.857 (p = 0.016) and 0.867 (p = 0.013) for BA/BPD, BA–BPD and BA/HC, respectively. Conclusions: BA alone, as well as BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA–BPD might be useful predictors of ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. However, such evidence needs extensive confirmation by means of additional studies with large sample sizes, especially in case of pregnancies at high risk for ShD (i.e., gestational diabetes). MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9101462/ /pubmed/35565142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095747 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article La Verde, Marco De Franciscis, Pasquale Torre, Clelia Celardo, Angela Grassini, Giulia Papa, Rossella Cianci, Stefano Capristo, Carlo Morlando, Maddalena Riemma, Gaetano Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study |
title | Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full | Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_short | Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_sort | accuracy of fetal biacromial diameter and derived ultrasonographic parameters to predict shoulder dystocia: a prospective observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laverdemarco accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT defranciscispasquale accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT torreclelia accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT celardoangela accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT grassinigiulia accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT paparossella accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT ciancistefano accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT capristocarlo accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT morlandomaddalena accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT riemmagaetano accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy |