Cargando…

Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study

Background and Objectives: Shoulder dystocia (ShD) is one of most dangerous obstetric complication. The objective of this study was to determine if the ultrasonographic fetal biacromial diameter (BA) and derived parameters could predict ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Materials and Methods: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: La Verde, Marco, De Franciscis, Pasquale, Torre, Clelia, Celardo, Angela, Grassini, Giulia, Papa, Rossella, Cianci, Stefano, Capristo, Carlo, Morlando, Maddalena, Riemma, Gaetano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095747
_version_ 1784707091914555392
author La Verde, Marco
De Franciscis, Pasquale
Torre, Clelia
Celardo, Angela
Grassini, Giulia
Papa, Rossella
Cianci, Stefano
Capristo, Carlo
Morlando, Maddalena
Riemma, Gaetano
author_facet La Verde, Marco
De Franciscis, Pasquale
Torre, Clelia
Celardo, Angela
Grassini, Giulia
Papa, Rossella
Cianci, Stefano
Capristo, Carlo
Morlando, Maddalena
Riemma, Gaetano
author_sort La Verde, Marco
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Shoulder dystocia (ShD) is one of most dangerous obstetric complication. The objective of this study was to determine if the ultrasonographic fetal biacromial diameter (BA) and derived parameters could predict ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary care university hospital from March 2021 to February 2022. We included all full-term pregnancies accepted for delivery that received an accurate ultrasonography (USG) scan before delivery. USG biometry and estimated fetal weight (EFW) were collected. Therefore, we evaluated the diameter of the mid-arm, the transverse thoracic diameter (TTD) and the biacromial diameter (BA). BA was estimated using Youssef’s formula: TTD + 2 mid-arm diameters. The primary outcome was the evaluation of BA and its related parameters (BA/biparietal diameter (BPD), BA/head circumference (HC) and BA–BPD in fetuses with ShD versus fetuses without ShD. Diagnostic accuracy for ShD of BA, BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA–BPD was evaluated using receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. Results: 90 women were included in the analysis, four of these had ShD and required extra maneuvers after head delivery. BA was increased in fetuses with ShD (150.4 cm; 95% CI 133.2 cm to 167.6 cm) compared to no-ShD (133.5 cm; 95% CI 130.1 cm to 137.0 cm; p = 0.04). Significant differences were also found between ShD and no-ShD groups for BA/BPD (1.66 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.86) vs. 1.44 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.48); p = 0.04), BA/HC (0.45 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.49) vs. 0.39 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.40); p = 0.01), BA–BPD (60.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 77.6 cm) vs. 41.4 (95% CI 38.2 to 44.6); p = 0.03), respectively. ROC analysis showed an overall good accuracy for ShD, with an AUC of 0.821 (p = 0.001) for BA alone and 0.881 (p = 0.001), 0.857 (p = 0.016) and 0.867 (p = 0.013) for BA/BPD, BA–BPD and BA/HC, respectively. Conclusions: BA alone, as well as BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA–BPD might be useful predictors of ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. However, such evidence needs extensive confirmation by means of additional studies with large sample sizes, especially in case of pregnancies at high risk for ShD (i.e., gestational diabetes).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9101462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91014622022-05-14 Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study La Verde, Marco De Franciscis, Pasquale Torre, Clelia Celardo, Angela Grassini, Giulia Papa, Rossella Cianci, Stefano Capristo, Carlo Morlando, Maddalena Riemma, Gaetano Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background and Objectives: Shoulder dystocia (ShD) is one of most dangerous obstetric complication. The objective of this study was to determine if the ultrasonographic fetal biacromial diameter (BA) and derived parameters could predict ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary care university hospital from March 2021 to February 2022. We included all full-term pregnancies accepted for delivery that received an accurate ultrasonography (USG) scan before delivery. USG biometry and estimated fetal weight (EFW) were collected. Therefore, we evaluated the diameter of the mid-arm, the transverse thoracic diameter (TTD) and the biacromial diameter (BA). BA was estimated using Youssef’s formula: TTD + 2 mid-arm diameters. The primary outcome was the evaluation of BA and its related parameters (BA/biparietal diameter (BPD), BA/head circumference (HC) and BA–BPD in fetuses with ShD versus fetuses without ShD. Diagnostic accuracy for ShD of BA, BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA–BPD was evaluated using receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. Results: 90 women were included in the analysis, four of these had ShD and required extra maneuvers after head delivery. BA was increased in fetuses with ShD (150.4 cm; 95% CI 133.2 cm to 167.6 cm) compared to no-ShD (133.5 cm; 95% CI 130.1 cm to 137.0 cm; p = 0.04). Significant differences were also found between ShD and no-ShD groups for BA/BPD (1.66 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.86) vs. 1.44 (95% CI 1.41 to 1.48); p = 0.04), BA/HC (0.45 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.49) vs. 0.39 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.40); p = 0.01), BA–BPD (60.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 77.6 cm) vs. 41.4 (95% CI 38.2 to 44.6); p = 0.03), respectively. ROC analysis showed an overall good accuracy for ShD, with an AUC of 0.821 (p = 0.001) for BA alone and 0.881 (p = 0.001), 0.857 (p = 0.016) and 0.867 (p = 0.013) for BA/BPD, BA–BPD and BA/HC, respectively. Conclusions: BA alone, as well as BA/BPD, BA/HC and BA–BPD might be useful predictors of ShD in uncomplicated term pregnancies. However, such evidence needs extensive confirmation by means of additional studies with large sample sizes, especially in case of pregnancies at high risk for ShD (i.e., gestational diabetes). MDPI 2022-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9101462/ /pubmed/35565142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095747 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
La Verde, Marco
De Franciscis, Pasquale
Torre, Clelia
Celardo, Angela
Grassini, Giulia
Papa, Rossella
Cianci, Stefano
Capristo, Carlo
Morlando, Maddalena
Riemma, Gaetano
Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study
title Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Accuracy of Fetal Biacromial Diameter and Derived Ultrasonographic Parameters to Predict Shoulder Dystocia: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort accuracy of fetal biacromial diameter and derived ultrasonographic parameters to predict shoulder dystocia: a prospective observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095747
work_keys_str_mv AT laverdemarco accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT defranciscispasquale accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT torreclelia accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT celardoangela accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT grassinigiulia accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT paparossella accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ciancistefano accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT capristocarlo accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT morlandomaddalena accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT riemmagaetano accuracyoffetalbiacromialdiameterandderivedultrasonographicparameterstopredictshoulderdystociaaprospectiveobservationalstudy