Cargando…

Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction

Quick, efficient, fully automated open-source programs to segment muscle and adipose tissues from computed tomography (CT) images would be a great contribution to body composition research. This study examined the concordance of cross-sectional areas (CSA) and densities for muscle, visceral adipose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomez-Perez, Sandra L., Zhang, Yanyu, Byrne, Cecily, Wakefield, Connor, Geesey, Thomas, Sclamberg, Joy, Peterson, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093357
_version_ 1784707117659193344
author Gomez-Perez, Sandra L.
Zhang, Yanyu
Byrne, Cecily
Wakefield, Connor
Geesey, Thomas
Sclamberg, Joy
Peterson, Sarah
author_facet Gomez-Perez, Sandra L.
Zhang, Yanyu
Byrne, Cecily
Wakefield, Connor
Geesey, Thomas
Sclamberg, Joy
Peterson, Sarah
author_sort Gomez-Perez, Sandra L.
collection PubMed
description Quick, efficient, fully automated open-source programs to segment muscle and adipose tissues from computed tomography (CT) images would be a great contribution to body composition research. This study examined the concordance of cross-sectional areas (CSA) and densities for muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) from CT images at the third lumbar (L3) between an automated neural network (test method) and a semi-automatic human-based program (reference method). Concordance was further evaluated by disease status, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI categories. Agreement statistics applied included Lin’s Concordance (CCC), Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC), Sorensen dice-similarity coefficient (DSC), and Bland–Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA) within 1.96 standard deviation. A total of 420 images from a diverse cohort of patients (60.35 ± 10.92 years; body mass index (BMI) of 28.77 ± 7.04 kg/m(2); 55% female; 53% Black) were included in this study. About 30% of patients were healthy (i.e., received a CT scan for acute illness or pre-surgical donor work-up), while another 30% had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The CCC, SCC, and DSC estimates for muscle, VAT, SAT were all greater than 0.80 (>0.80 indicates good performance). Agreement analysis by diagnosis showed good performance for the test method except for critical illness (DSC 0.65–0.87). Bland–Altman plots revealed narrow LOA suggestive of good agreement despite minimal proportional bias around the zero-bias line for muscle, SAT, and IMAT CSA. The test method shows good performance and almost perfect concordance for L3 muscle, VAT, SAT, and IMAT per DSC estimates, and Bland–Altman plots even after stratification by sex, race/ethnicity, and BMI categories. Care must be taken to assess the density of the CT images from critically ill patients before applying the automated neural network (test method).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9101564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91015642022-05-14 Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction Gomez-Perez, Sandra L. Zhang, Yanyu Byrne, Cecily Wakefield, Connor Geesey, Thomas Sclamberg, Joy Peterson, Sarah Sensors (Basel) Article Quick, efficient, fully automated open-source programs to segment muscle and adipose tissues from computed tomography (CT) images would be a great contribution to body composition research. This study examined the concordance of cross-sectional areas (CSA) and densities for muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) from CT images at the third lumbar (L3) between an automated neural network (test method) and a semi-automatic human-based program (reference method). Concordance was further evaluated by disease status, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI categories. Agreement statistics applied included Lin’s Concordance (CCC), Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC), Sorensen dice-similarity coefficient (DSC), and Bland–Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA) within 1.96 standard deviation. A total of 420 images from a diverse cohort of patients (60.35 ± 10.92 years; body mass index (BMI) of 28.77 ± 7.04 kg/m(2); 55% female; 53% Black) were included in this study. About 30% of patients were healthy (i.e., received a CT scan for acute illness or pre-surgical donor work-up), while another 30% had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The CCC, SCC, and DSC estimates for muscle, VAT, SAT were all greater than 0.80 (>0.80 indicates good performance). Agreement analysis by diagnosis showed good performance for the test method except for critical illness (DSC 0.65–0.87). Bland–Altman plots revealed narrow LOA suggestive of good agreement despite minimal proportional bias around the zero-bias line for muscle, SAT, and IMAT CSA. The test method shows good performance and almost perfect concordance for L3 muscle, VAT, SAT, and IMAT per DSC estimates, and Bland–Altman plots even after stratification by sex, race/ethnicity, and BMI categories. Care must be taken to assess the density of the CT images from critically ill patients before applying the automated neural network (test method). MDPI 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9101564/ /pubmed/35591047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093357 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gomez-Perez, Sandra L.
Zhang, Yanyu
Byrne, Cecily
Wakefield, Connor
Geesey, Thomas
Sclamberg, Joy
Peterson, Sarah
Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction
title Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction
title_full Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction
title_fullStr Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction
title_full_unstemmed Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction
title_short Concordance of Computed Tomography Regional Body Composition Analysis Using a Fully Automated Open-Source Neural Network versus a Reference Semi-Automated Program with Manual Correction
title_sort concordance of computed tomography regional body composition analysis using a fully automated open-source neural network versus a reference semi-automated program with manual correction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093357
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezperezsandral concordanceofcomputedtomographyregionalbodycompositionanalysisusingafullyautomatedopensourceneuralnetworkversusareferencesemiautomatedprogramwithmanualcorrection
AT zhangyanyu concordanceofcomputedtomographyregionalbodycompositionanalysisusingafullyautomatedopensourceneuralnetworkversusareferencesemiautomatedprogramwithmanualcorrection
AT byrnececily concordanceofcomputedtomographyregionalbodycompositionanalysisusingafullyautomatedopensourceneuralnetworkversusareferencesemiautomatedprogramwithmanualcorrection
AT wakefieldconnor concordanceofcomputedtomographyregionalbodycompositionanalysisusingafullyautomatedopensourceneuralnetworkversusareferencesemiautomatedprogramwithmanualcorrection
AT geeseythomas concordanceofcomputedtomographyregionalbodycompositionanalysisusingafullyautomatedopensourceneuralnetworkversusareferencesemiautomatedprogramwithmanualcorrection
AT sclambergjoy concordanceofcomputedtomographyregionalbodycompositionanalysisusingafullyautomatedopensourceneuralnetworkversusareferencesemiautomatedprogramwithmanualcorrection
AT petersonsarah concordanceofcomputedtomographyregionalbodycompositionanalysisusingafullyautomatedopensourceneuralnetworkversusareferencesemiautomatedprogramwithmanualcorrection