Cargando…
Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various fabrication techniques and materials used in implant-supported mandibular overdentures with a Hader bar attachment over added stress distribution. Three-dimensional geometric solid models, consisting of two implants (3.3 mm × 12 mm) pl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093248 |
_version_ | 1784707159562387456 |
---|---|
author | Kümbüloğlu, Övül Koyuncu, Beril Yerlioğlu, Gözde Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu |
author_facet | Kümbüloğlu, Övül Koyuncu, Beril Yerlioğlu, Gözde Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu |
author_sort | Kümbüloğlu, Övül |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various fabrication techniques and materials used in implant-supported mandibular overdentures with a Hader bar attachment over added stress distribution. Three-dimensional geometric solid models, consisting of two implants (3.3 mm × 12 mm) placed at the bone level on both mandibular canine regions and a Hader bar structure, were prepared. Model 1 simulated a bar retentive system made from Titanium Grade 5 material by Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling technique without using any converting adapter/multi-unit element on the implants, while Model 2 simulated the same configuration, but with converting adapters on the implants. Model 3 simulated a bar retentive system made from Cobalt-Chromium material, made by using conventional casting technique with converting adapters on the implants. Static loads of 100 Newton were applied on test models from horizontal, vertical and oblique directions. ANSYS R15.0 Workbench Software was used to compare Von Mises stress distribution and minimum/maximum principal stress values, and the results were evaluated by using Finite Element Analysis method. As a result, the highest stress distribution values under static loading in three different directions were obtained in Model 1. Stress was observed intensely around the necks of the implants and the surrounding cortical bone areas in all models. In scope of the results obtained, using converting adapters on implants has been considered to decrease transmission of forces onto implants and surrounding bone structures, thus providing a better stress distribution. It has also been observed that the type of material used for bar fabrication has no significant influence on stress values in those models where converting adapters were used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9101733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91017332022-05-14 Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures Kümbüloğlu, Övül Koyuncu, Beril Yerlioğlu, Gözde Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various fabrication techniques and materials used in implant-supported mandibular overdentures with a Hader bar attachment over added stress distribution. Three-dimensional geometric solid models, consisting of two implants (3.3 mm × 12 mm) placed at the bone level on both mandibular canine regions and a Hader bar structure, were prepared. Model 1 simulated a bar retentive system made from Titanium Grade 5 material by Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling technique without using any converting adapter/multi-unit element on the implants, while Model 2 simulated the same configuration, but with converting adapters on the implants. Model 3 simulated a bar retentive system made from Cobalt-Chromium material, made by using conventional casting technique with converting adapters on the implants. Static loads of 100 Newton were applied on test models from horizontal, vertical and oblique directions. ANSYS R15.0 Workbench Software was used to compare Von Mises stress distribution and minimum/maximum principal stress values, and the results were evaluated by using Finite Element Analysis method. As a result, the highest stress distribution values under static loading in three different directions were obtained in Model 1. Stress was observed intensely around the necks of the implants and the surrounding cortical bone areas in all models. In scope of the results obtained, using converting adapters on implants has been considered to decrease transmission of forces onto implants and surrounding bone structures, thus providing a better stress distribution. It has also been observed that the type of material used for bar fabrication has no significant influence on stress values in those models where converting adapters were used. MDPI 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9101733/ /pubmed/35591581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093248 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kümbüloğlu, Övül Koyuncu, Beril Yerlioğlu, Gözde Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures |
title | Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures |
title_full | Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures |
title_fullStr | Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures |
title_full_unstemmed | Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures |
title_short | Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures |
title_sort | stress distribution on various implant-retained bar overdentures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumbulogluovul stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures AT koyuncuberil stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures AT yerlioglugozde stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures AT alhajhusainnadin stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures AT ozcanmutlu stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures |