Cargando…

Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various fabrication techniques and materials used in implant-supported mandibular overdentures with a Hader bar attachment over added stress distribution. Three-dimensional geometric solid models, consisting of two implants (3.3 mm × 12 mm) pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kümbüloğlu, Övül, Koyuncu, Beril, Yerlioğlu, Gözde, Al-Haj Husain, Nadin, Özcan, Mutlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093248
_version_ 1784707159562387456
author Kümbüloğlu, Övül
Koyuncu, Beril
Yerlioğlu, Gözde
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
author_facet Kümbüloğlu, Övül
Koyuncu, Beril
Yerlioğlu, Gözde
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
author_sort Kümbüloğlu, Övül
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various fabrication techniques and materials used in implant-supported mandibular overdentures with a Hader bar attachment over added stress distribution. Three-dimensional geometric solid models, consisting of two implants (3.3 mm × 12 mm) placed at the bone level on both mandibular canine regions and a Hader bar structure, were prepared. Model 1 simulated a bar retentive system made from Titanium Grade 5 material by Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling technique without using any converting adapter/multi-unit element on the implants, while Model 2 simulated the same configuration, but with converting adapters on the implants. Model 3 simulated a bar retentive system made from Cobalt-Chromium material, made by using conventional casting technique with converting adapters on the implants. Static loads of 100 Newton were applied on test models from horizontal, vertical and oblique directions. ANSYS R15.0 Workbench Software was used to compare Von Mises stress distribution and minimum/maximum principal stress values, and the results were evaluated by using Finite Element Analysis method. As a result, the highest stress distribution values under static loading in three different directions were obtained in Model 1. Stress was observed intensely around the necks of the implants and the surrounding cortical bone areas in all models. In scope of the results obtained, using converting adapters on implants has been considered to decrease transmission of forces onto implants and surrounding bone structures, thus providing a better stress distribution. It has also been observed that the type of material used for bar fabrication has no significant influence on stress values in those models where converting adapters were used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9101733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91017332022-05-14 Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures Kümbüloğlu, Övül Koyuncu, Beril Yerlioğlu, Gözde Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various fabrication techniques and materials used in implant-supported mandibular overdentures with a Hader bar attachment over added stress distribution. Three-dimensional geometric solid models, consisting of two implants (3.3 mm × 12 mm) placed at the bone level on both mandibular canine regions and a Hader bar structure, were prepared. Model 1 simulated a bar retentive system made from Titanium Grade 5 material by Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling technique without using any converting adapter/multi-unit element on the implants, while Model 2 simulated the same configuration, but with converting adapters on the implants. Model 3 simulated a bar retentive system made from Cobalt-Chromium material, made by using conventional casting technique with converting adapters on the implants. Static loads of 100 Newton were applied on test models from horizontal, vertical and oblique directions. ANSYS R15.0 Workbench Software was used to compare Von Mises stress distribution and minimum/maximum principal stress values, and the results were evaluated by using Finite Element Analysis method. As a result, the highest stress distribution values under static loading in three different directions were obtained in Model 1. Stress was observed intensely around the necks of the implants and the surrounding cortical bone areas in all models. In scope of the results obtained, using converting adapters on implants has been considered to decrease transmission of forces onto implants and surrounding bone structures, thus providing a better stress distribution. It has also been observed that the type of material used for bar fabrication has no significant influence on stress values in those models where converting adapters were used. MDPI 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9101733/ /pubmed/35591581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093248 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kümbüloğlu, Övül
Koyuncu, Beril
Yerlioğlu, Gözde
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures
title Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures
title_full Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures
title_fullStr Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures
title_full_unstemmed Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures
title_short Stress Distribution on Various Implant-Retained Bar Overdentures
title_sort stress distribution on various implant-retained bar overdentures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093248
work_keys_str_mv AT kumbulogluovul stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures
AT koyuncuberil stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures
AT yerlioglugozde stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures
AT alhajhusainnadin stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures
AT ozcanmutlu stressdistributiononvariousimplantretainedbaroverdentures