Cargando…

Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images

BACKGROUND: Radiomics plays an important role in the field of oncology. Few studies have focused on the identification of factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models. The goal of this study was to use contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to identify factors th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Yuqi, Wang, Simin, Liu, Ziang, You, Chao, Li, Ruimin, Mao, Ning, Duan, Shaofeng, Lynn, Henry S., Gu, Yajia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8
_version_ 1784707182966603776
author Sun, Yuqi
Wang, Simin
Liu, Ziang
You, Chao
Li, Ruimin
Mao, Ning
Duan, Shaofeng
Lynn, Henry S.
Gu, Yajia
author_facet Sun, Yuqi
Wang, Simin
Liu, Ziang
You, Chao
Li, Ruimin
Mao, Ning
Duan, Shaofeng
Lynn, Henry S.
Gu, Yajia
author_sort Sun, Yuqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiomics plays an important role in the field of oncology. Few studies have focused on the identification of factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models. The goal of this study was to use contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to identify factors that may potentially influence the performance of radiomics models in diagnosing breast lesions. METHODS: A total of 157 women with 161 breast lesions were included. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the random forest (RF) algorithm were employed to construct radiomics models. The classification result for each lesion was obtained by using 100 rounds of five-fold cross-validation. The image features interpreted by the radiologists were used in the exploratory factor analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between the image features and misclassification. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to examine the findings. RESULTS: Among the lesions misclassified by both LASSO and RF ≥ 20% of the iterations in the cross-validation and those misclassified by both algorithms ≤5% of the iterations, univariate analysis showed that larger lesion size and the presence of rim artifacts and/or ripple artifacts were associated with more misclassifications among benign lesions, and smaller lesion size was associated with more misclassifications among malignant lesions (all p <  0.050). Multivariate analysis showed that smaller lesion size (odds ratio [OR] = 0.699, p = 0.002) and the presence of air trapping artifacts (OR = 35.568, p = 0.025) were factors that may lead to misclassification among malignant lesions. Additional exploratory analyses showed that benign lesions with rim artifacts and small malignant lesions (< 20 mm) with air trapping artifacts were misclassified by approximately 50% more in rate compared with benign and malignant lesions without these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size and artifacts in CEM images may affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics models. The classification results for lesions presenting with certain factors may be less reliable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9101829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91018292022-05-14 Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images Sun, Yuqi Wang, Simin Liu, Ziang You, Chao Li, Ruimin Mao, Ning Duan, Shaofeng Lynn, Henry S. Gu, Yajia Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Radiomics plays an important role in the field of oncology. Few studies have focused on the identification of factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models. The goal of this study was to use contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to identify factors that may potentially influence the performance of radiomics models in diagnosing breast lesions. METHODS: A total of 157 women with 161 breast lesions were included. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the random forest (RF) algorithm were employed to construct radiomics models. The classification result for each lesion was obtained by using 100 rounds of five-fold cross-validation. The image features interpreted by the radiologists were used in the exploratory factor analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between the image features and misclassification. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to examine the findings. RESULTS: Among the lesions misclassified by both LASSO and RF ≥ 20% of the iterations in the cross-validation and those misclassified by both algorithms ≤5% of the iterations, univariate analysis showed that larger lesion size and the presence of rim artifacts and/or ripple artifacts were associated with more misclassifications among benign lesions, and smaller lesion size was associated with more misclassifications among malignant lesions (all p <  0.050). Multivariate analysis showed that smaller lesion size (odds ratio [OR] = 0.699, p = 0.002) and the presence of air trapping artifacts (OR = 35.568, p = 0.025) were factors that may lead to misclassification among malignant lesions. Additional exploratory analyses showed that benign lesions with rim artifacts and small malignant lesions (< 20 mm) with air trapping artifacts were misclassified by approximately 50% more in rate compared with benign and malignant lesions without these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size and artifacts in CEM images may affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics models. The classification results for lesions presenting with certain factors may be less reliable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8. BioMed Central 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9101829/ /pubmed/35550658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sun, Yuqi
Wang, Simin
Liu, Ziang
You, Chao
Li, Ruimin
Mao, Ning
Duan, Shaofeng
Lynn, Henry S.
Gu, Yajia
Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images
title Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images
title_full Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images
title_fullStr Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images
title_full_unstemmed Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images
title_short Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images
title_sort identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (cem) images
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sunyuqi identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages
AT wangsimin identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages
AT liuziang identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages
AT youchao identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages
AT liruimin identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages
AT maoning identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages
AT duanshaofeng identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages
AT lynnhenrys identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages
AT guyajia identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages