Cargando…
Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images
BACKGROUND: Radiomics plays an important role in the field of oncology. Few studies have focused on the identification of factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models. The goal of this study was to use contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to identify factors th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8 |
_version_ | 1784707182966603776 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Yuqi Wang, Simin Liu, Ziang You, Chao Li, Ruimin Mao, Ning Duan, Shaofeng Lynn, Henry S. Gu, Yajia |
author_facet | Sun, Yuqi Wang, Simin Liu, Ziang You, Chao Li, Ruimin Mao, Ning Duan, Shaofeng Lynn, Henry S. Gu, Yajia |
author_sort | Sun, Yuqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Radiomics plays an important role in the field of oncology. Few studies have focused on the identification of factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models. The goal of this study was to use contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to identify factors that may potentially influence the performance of radiomics models in diagnosing breast lesions. METHODS: A total of 157 women with 161 breast lesions were included. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the random forest (RF) algorithm were employed to construct radiomics models. The classification result for each lesion was obtained by using 100 rounds of five-fold cross-validation. The image features interpreted by the radiologists were used in the exploratory factor analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between the image features and misclassification. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to examine the findings. RESULTS: Among the lesions misclassified by both LASSO and RF ≥ 20% of the iterations in the cross-validation and those misclassified by both algorithms ≤5% of the iterations, univariate analysis showed that larger lesion size and the presence of rim artifacts and/or ripple artifacts were associated with more misclassifications among benign lesions, and smaller lesion size was associated with more misclassifications among malignant lesions (all p < 0.050). Multivariate analysis showed that smaller lesion size (odds ratio [OR] = 0.699, p = 0.002) and the presence of air trapping artifacts (OR = 35.568, p = 0.025) were factors that may lead to misclassification among malignant lesions. Additional exploratory analyses showed that benign lesions with rim artifacts and small malignant lesions (< 20 mm) with air trapping artifacts were misclassified by approximately 50% more in rate compared with benign and malignant lesions without these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size and artifacts in CEM images may affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics models. The classification results for lesions presenting with certain factors may be less reliable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9101829 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91018292022-05-14 Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images Sun, Yuqi Wang, Simin Liu, Ziang You, Chao Li, Ruimin Mao, Ning Duan, Shaofeng Lynn, Henry S. Gu, Yajia Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Radiomics plays an important role in the field of oncology. Few studies have focused on the identification of factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models. The goal of this study was to use contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to identify factors that may potentially influence the performance of radiomics models in diagnosing breast lesions. METHODS: A total of 157 women with 161 breast lesions were included. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the random forest (RF) algorithm were employed to construct radiomics models. The classification result for each lesion was obtained by using 100 rounds of five-fold cross-validation. The image features interpreted by the radiologists were used in the exploratory factor analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between the image features and misclassification. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to examine the findings. RESULTS: Among the lesions misclassified by both LASSO and RF ≥ 20% of the iterations in the cross-validation and those misclassified by both algorithms ≤5% of the iterations, univariate analysis showed that larger lesion size and the presence of rim artifacts and/or ripple artifacts were associated with more misclassifications among benign lesions, and smaller lesion size was associated with more misclassifications among malignant lesions (all p < 0.050). Multivariate analysis showed that smaller lesion size (odds ratio [OR] = 0.699, p = 0.002) and the presence of air trapping artifacts (OR = 35.568, p = 0.025) were factors that may lead to misclassification among malignant lesions. Additional exploratory analyses showed that benign lesions with rim artifacts and small malignant lesions (< 20 mm) with air trapping artifacts were misclassified by approximately 50% more in rate compared with benign and malignant lesions without these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion size and artifacts in CEM images may affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics models. The classification results for lesions presenting with certain factors may be less reliable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8. BioMed Central 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9101829/ /pubmed/35550658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sun, Yuqi Wang, Simin Liu, Ziang You, Chao Li, Ruimin Mao, Ning Duan, Shaofeng Lynn, Henry S. Gu, Yajia Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images |
title | Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images |
title_full | Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images |
title_fullStr | Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images |
title_short | Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images |
title_sort | identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (cem) images |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101829/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunyuqi identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages AT wangsimin identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages AT liuziang identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages AT youchao identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages AT liruimin identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages AT maoning identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages AT duanshaofeng identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages AT lynnhenrys identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages AT guyajia identifyingfactorsthatmayinfluencetheclassificationperformanceofradiomicsmodelsusingcontrastenhancedmammographycemimages |