Cargando…

Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review

Although it is common to measure bone lengths for study, methodological errors in data measurement and processing often invalidate their clinical and scientific usefulness. This manuscript reviews the validity of several published equations used to determine the maximum height in older adults, since...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramos-Jiménez, Arnulfo, Hernández-Torres, Rosa P., Chávez-Guevara, Isaac A., Alvarez-Sanchez, José A., García-Villalvazo, Marco A., Murguía-Romero, Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095072
_version_ 1784707213407813632
author Ramos-Jiménez, Arnulfo
Hernández-Torres, Rosa P.
Chávez-Guevara, Isaac A.
Alvarez-Sanchez, José A.
García-Villalvazo, Marco A.
Murguía-Romero, Miguel
author_facet Ramos-Jiménez, Arnulfo
Hernández-Torres, Rosa P.
Chávez-Guevara, Isaac A.
Alvarez-Sanchez, José A.
García-Villalvazo, Marco A.
Murguía-Romero, Miguel
author_sort Ramos-Jiménez, Arnulfo
collection PubMed
description Although it is common to measure bone lengths for study, methodological errors in data measurement and processing often invalidate their clinical and scientific usefulness. This manuscript reviews the validity of several published equations used to determine the maximum height in older adults, since height is an anthropometric parameter widely employed in health sciences. A systematic review of original articles published in the English, Spanish, or Portuguese languages was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, Springer Link, and two institutional publisher integrators (UACJ and CONRICYT). The search terms were included in the metasearch engines in a combined way and text form using the Boolean connectors AND and OR {(Determination OR Estimation OR Equation) AND Height AND (Elderly OR “Older adults”)}. Eleven manuscripts were selected from 1935 records identified through database searching after applying the following criteria: (1) original articles that designed and validated equations for the determination of height by anthropometric methods in adults 60 years of age and older and (2) manuscripts that presented robust evidence of validation of the proposed regression models. The validity of the reported linear regression models was assessed throughout a manuscript review process called multi-objective optimization that considered the collection of the models, the prediction errors, and the adjustment values (i.e., R(2), standard error of estimation, and pure error). A total of 64 equations were designed and validated in 45,449 participants (57.1% women) from four continents: America (85.3%, with 46 equations), Asia (8.1%, with 10), Europe (4.6%, with 7), and Africa (2.0%, with 1); the Hispanic American ethnic group was the most numerous in participants and equations (69.0%, with 28). Due to various omissions and methodological errors, this study did not find any valid and reliable equations to assess the maximum height in older adults by anthropometric methods. It is proposed to adjust allometric mathematical models that can be interpreted in the light of ontogenetic processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9101954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91019542022-05-14 Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review Ramos-Jiménez, Arnulfo Hernández-Torres, Rosa P. Chávez-Guevara, Isaac A. Alvarez-Sanchez, José A. García-Villalvazo, Marco A. Murguía-Romero, Miguel Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Although it is common to measure bone lengths for study, methodological errors in data measurement and processing often invalidate their clinical and scientific usefulness. This manuscript reviews the validity of several published equations used to determine the maximum height in older adults, since height is an anthropometric parameter widely employed in health sciences. A systematic review of original articles published in the English, Spanish, or Portuguese languages was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, Springer Link, and two institutional publisher integrators (UACJ and CONRICYT). The search terms were included in the metasearch engines in a combined way and text form using the Boolean connectors AND and OR {(Determination OR Estimation OR Equation) AND Height AND (Elderly OR “Older adults”)}. Eleven manuscripts were selected from 1935 records identified through database searching after applying the following criteria: (1) original articles that designed and validated equations for the determination of height by anthropometric methods in adults 60 years of age and older and (2) manuscripts that presented robust evidence of validation of the proposed regression models. The validity of the reported linear regression models was assessed throughout a manuscript review process called multi-objective optimization that considered the collection of the models, the prediction errors, and the adjustment values (i.e., R(2), standard error of estimation, and pure error). A total of 64 equations were designed and validated in 45,449 participants (57.1% women) from four continents: America (85.3%, with 46 equations), Asia (8.1%, with 10), Europe (4.6%, with 7), and Africa (2.0%, with 1); the Hispanic American ethnic group was the most numerous in participants and equations (69.0%, with 28). Due to various omissions and methodological errors, this study did not find any valid and reliable equations to assess the maximum height in older adults by anthropometric methods. It is proposed to adjust allometric mathematical models that can be interpreted in the light of ontogenetic processes. MDPI 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9101954/ /pubmed/35564467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095072 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ramos-Jiménez, Arnulfo
Hernández-Torres, Rosa P.
Chávez-Guevara, Isaac A.
Alvarez-Sanchez, José A.
García-Villalvazo, Marco A.
Murguía-Romero, Miguel
Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review
title Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review
title_full Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review
title_short Anthropometric Equations to Determine Maximum Height in Adults ≥ 60 Years: A Systematic Review
title_sort anthropometric equations to determine maximum height in adults ≥ 60 years: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9101954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35564467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095072
work_keys_str_mv AT ramosjimenezarnulfo anthropometricequationstodeterminemaximumheightinadults60yearsasystematicreview
AT hernandeztorresrosap anthropometricequationstodeterminemaximumheightinadults60yearsasystematicreview
AT chavezguevaraisaaca anthropometricequationstodeterminemaximumheightinadults60yearsasystematicreview
AT alvarezsanchezjosea anthropometricequationstodeterminemaximumheightinadults60yearsasystematicreview
AT garciavillalvazomarcoa anthropometricequationstodeterminemaximumheightinadults60yearsasystematicreview
AT murguiaromeromiguel anthropometricequationstodeterminemaximumheightinadults60yearsasystematicreview