Cargando…

A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites †

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CAD/CAM composite thickness on micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS), microhardness (HV), and film thickness (FT) of different luting composites. Composite blocks (6.8 mm × 6.8 mm) were divided into 12 groups according to: CAD/CAM thickness and luting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Askary, Farid, Hassanein, Abdullah, Aboalazm, Emad, Al-Haj Husain, Nadin, Özcan, Mutlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093050
_version_ 1784707235721510912
author El-Askary, Farid
Hassanein, Abdullah
Aboalazm, Emad
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
author_facet El-Askary, Farid
Hassanein, Abdullah
Aboalazm, Emad
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
author_sort El-Askary, Farid
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CAD/CAM composite thickness on micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS), microhardness (HV), and film thickness (FT) of different luting composites. Composite blocks (6.8 mm × 6.8 mm) were divided into 12 groups according to: CAD/CAM thickness and luting composite. For each group, 21 rods (1 mm × 1 mm) were tested in tension at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Fracture modes were categorized as adhesive, mixed, and cohesive. Microhardness (n = 5/group) was assessed using microhardness tester. Film thickness (12-rods/group) was evaluated using a stereomicroscope (×40). Data were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05). Parameters “thickness”, “cement”, and “thickness x cement” showed significant difference on µTBS and HV (p < 0.05). At 2 mm, heated x-tra fil composite showed the highest µTBS (45.0 ± 8.5 MPa), while at 4 mm thickness, Grandio Flow revealed the lowest µTBS (33.3 ± 6.3 MPa). Adhesive, mixed, and cohesive failures were reported. The HV of all composites decreased when photo-polymerized through 4 mm thickness (p < 0.05). Regardless of CAD/CAM thickness, photo-polymerized composites can be successfully used for luting CAD/CAM composite.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9102044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91020442022-05-14 A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites † El-Askary, Farid Hassanein, Abdullah Aboalazm, Emad Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CAD/CAM composite thickness on micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS), microhardness (HV), and film thickness (FT) of different luting composites. Composite blocks (6.8 mm × 6.8 mm) were divided into 12 groups according to: CAD/CAM thickness and luting composite. For each group, 21 rods (1 mm × 1 mm) were tested in tension at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Fracture modes were categorized as adhesive, mixed, and cohesive. Microhardness (n = 5/group) was assessed using microhardness tester. Film thickness (12-rods/group) was evaluated using a stereomicroscope (×40). Data were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05). Parameters “thickness”, “cement”, and “thickness x cement” showed significant difference on µTBS and HV (p < 0.05). At 2 mm, heated x-tra fil composite showed the highest µTBS (45.0 ± 8.5 MPa), while at 4 mm thickness, Grandio Flow revealed the lowest µTBS (33.3 ± 6.3 MPa). Adhesive, mixed, and cohesive failures were reported. The HV of all composites decreased when photo-polymerized through 4 mm thickness (p < 0.05). Regardless of CAD/CAM thickness, photo-polymerized composites can be successfully used for luting CAD/CAM composite. MDPI 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9102044/ /pubmed/35591383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093050 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
El-Askary, Farid
Hassanein, Abdullah
Aboalazm, Emad
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites †
title A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites †
title_full A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites †
title_fullStr A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites †
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites †
title_short A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites †
title_sort comparison of microtensile bond strength, film thickness, and microhardness of photo-polymerized luting composites †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591383
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093050
work_keys_str_mv AT elaskaryfarid acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT hassaneinabdullah acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT aboalazmemad acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT alhajhusainnadin acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT ozcanmutlu acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT elaskaryfarid comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT hassaneinabdullah comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT aboalazmemad comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT alhajhusainnadin comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites
AT ozcanmutlu comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites