Cargando…
A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites †
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CAD/CAM composite thickness on micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS), microhardness (HV), and film thickness (FT) of different luting composites. Composite blocks (6.8 mm × 6.8 mm) were divided into 12 groups according to: CAD/CAM thickness and luting...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093050 |
_version_ | 1784707235721510912 |
---|---|
author | El-Askary, Farid Hassanein, Abdullah Aboalazm, Emad Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu |
author_facet | El-Askary, Farid Hassanein, Abdullah Aboalazm, Emad Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu |
author_sort | El-Askary, Farid |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CAD/CAM composite thickness on micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS), microhardness (HV), and film thickness (FT) of different luting composites. Composite blocks (6.8 mm × 6.8 mm) were divided into 12 groups according to: CAD/CAM thickness and luting composite. For each group, 21 rods (1 mm × 1 mm) were tested in tension at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Fracture modes were categorized as adhesive, mixed, and cohesive. Microhardness (n = 5/group) was assessed using microhardness tester. Film thickness (12-rods/group) was evaluated using a stereomicroscope (×40). Data were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05). Parameters “thickness”, “cement”, and “thickness x cement” showed significant difference on µTBS and HV (p < 0.05). At 2 mm, heated x-tra fil composite showed the highest µTBS (45.0 ± 8.5 MPa), while at 4 mm thickness, Grandio Flow revealed the lowest µTBS (33.3 ± 6.3 MPa). Adhesive, mixed, and cohesive failures were reported. The HV of all composites decreased when photo-polymerized through 4 mm thickness (p < 0.05). Regardless of CAD/CAM thickness, photo-polymerized composites can be successfully used for luting CAD/CAM composite. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9102044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91020442022-05-14 A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites † El-Askary, Farid Hassanein, Abdullah Aboalazm, Emad Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CAD/CAM composite thickness on micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS), microhardness (HV), and film thickness (FT) of different luting composites. Composite blocks (6.8 mm × 6.8 mm) were divided into 12 groups according to: CAD/CAM thickness and luting composite. For each group, 21 rods (1 mm × 1 mm) were tested in tension at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Fracture modes were categorized as adhesive, mixed, and cohesive. Microhardness (n = 5/group) was assessed using microhardness tester. Film thickness (12-rods/group) was evaluated using a stereomicroscope (×40). Data were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05). Parameters “thickness”, “cement”, and “thickness x cement” showed significant difference on µTBS and HV (p < 0.05). At 2 mm, heated x-tra fil composite showed the highest µTBS (45.0 ± 8.5 MPa), while at 4 mm thickness, Grandio Flow revealed the lowest µTBS (33.3 ± 6.3 MPa). Adhesive, mixed, and cohesive failures were reported. The HV of all composites decreased when photo-polymerized through 4 mm thickness (p < 0.05). Regardless of CAD/CAM thickness, photo-polymerized composites can be successfully used for luting CAD/CAM composite. MDPI 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9102044/ /pubmed/35591383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093050 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article El-Askary, Farid Hassanein, Abdullah Aboalazm, Emad Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites † |
title | A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites † |
title_full | A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites † |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites † |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites † |
title_short | A Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength, Film Thickness, and Microhardness of Photo-Polymerized Luting Composites † |
title_sort | comparison of microtensile bond strength, film thickness, and microhardness of photo-polymerized luting composites † |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35591383 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15093050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elaskaryfarid acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT hassaneinabdullah acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT aboalazmemad acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT alhajhusainnadin acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT ozcanmutlu acomparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT elaskaryfarid comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT hassaneinabdullah comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT aboalazmemad comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT alhajhusainnadin comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites AT ozcanmutlu comparisonofmicrotensilebondstrengthfilmthicknessandmicrohardnessofphotopolymerizedlutingcomposites |