Cargando…

Predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models

BACKGROUNDS: Evaluating the growth performance of pigs in real-time is laborious and expensive, thus mathematical models based on easily accessible variables are developed. Multiple regression (MR) is the most widely used tool to build prediction models in swine nutrition, while the artificial neura...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Li, Hu, Qile, Wang, Lu, Shi, Huangwei, Lai, Changhua, Zhang, Shuai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00707-1
_version_ 1784707376156246016
author Wang, Li
Hu, Qile
Wang, Lu
Shi, Huangwei
Lai, Changhua
Zhang, Shuai
author_facet Wang, Li
Hu, Qile
Wang, Lu
Shi, Huangwei
Lai, Changhua
Zhang, Shuai
author_sort Wang, Li
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Evaluating the growth performance of pigs in real-time is laborious and expensive, thus mathematical models based on easily accessible variables are developed. Multiple regression (MR) is the most widely used tool to build prediction models in swine nutrition, while the artificial neural networks (ANN) model is reported to be more accurate than MR model in prediction performance. Therefore, the potential of ANN models in predicting the growth performance of pigs was evaluated and compared with MR models in this study. RESULTS: Body weight (BW), net energy (NE) intake, standardized ileal digestible lysine (SID Lys) intake, and their quadratic terms were selected as input variables to predict ADG and F/G among 10 candidate variables. In the training phase, MR models showed high accuracy in both ADG and F/G prediction (R(2)(ADG) = 0.929, R(2)(F/G) = 0.886) while ANN models with 4, 6 neurons and radial basis activation function yielded the best performance in ADG and F/G prediction (R(2)(ADG) = 0.964, R(2)(F/G) = 0.932). In the testing phase, these ANN models showed better accuracy in ADG prediction (CCC: 0.976 vs. 0.861, R(2): 0.951 vs. 0.584), and F/G prediction (CCC: 0.952 vs. 0.900, R(2): 0.905 vs. 0.821) compared with the MR models. Meanwhile, the “over-fitting” occurred in MR models but not in ANN models. On validation data from the animal trial, ANN models exhibited superiority over MR models in both ADG and F/G prediction (P < 0.01). Moreover, the growth stages have a significant effect on the prediction accuracy of the models. CONCLUSION: Body weight, NE intake and SID Lys intake can be used as input variables to predict the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs, with trained ANN models are more flexible and accurate than MR models. Therefore, it is promising to use ANN models in related swine nutrition studies in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40104-022-00707-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9102637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91026372022-05-14 Predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models Wang, Li Hu, Qile Wang, Lu Shi, Huangwei Lai, Changhua Zhang, Shuai J Anim Sci Biotechnol Research BACKGROUNDS: Evaluating the growth performance of pigs in real-time is laborious and expensive, thus mathematical models based on easily accessible variables are developed. Multiple regression (MR) is the most widely used tool to build prediction models in swine nutrition, while the artificial neural networks (ANN) model is reported to be more accurate than MR model in prediction performance. Therefore, the potential of ANN models in predicting the growth performance of pigs was evaluated and compared with MR models in this study. RESULTS: Body weight (BW), net energy (NE) intake, standardized ileal digestible lysine (SID Lys) intake, and their quadratic terms were selected as input variables to predict ADG and F/G among 10 candidate variables. In the training phase, MR models showed high accuracy in both ADG and F/G prediction (R(2)(ADG) = 0.929, R(2)(F/G) = 0.886) while ANN models with 4, 6 neurons and radial basis activation function yielded the best performance in ADG and F/G prediction (R(2)(ADG) = 0.964, R(2)(F/G) = 0.932). In the testing phase, these ANN models showed better accuracy in ADG prediction (CCC: 0.976 vs. 0.861, R(2): 0.951 vs. 0.584), and F/G prediction (CCC: 0.952 vs. 0.900, R(2): 0.905 vs. 0.821) compared with the MR models. Meanwhile, the “over-fitting” occurred in MR models but not in ANN models. On validation data from the animal trial, ANN models exhibited superiority over MR models in both ADG and F/G prediction (P < 0.01). Moreover, the growth stages have a significant effect on the prediction accuracy of the models. CONCLUSION: Body weight, NE intake and SID Lys intake can be used as input variables to predict the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs, with trained ANN models are more flexible and accurate than MR models. Therefore, it is promising to use ANN models in related swine nutrition studies in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40104-022-00707-1. BioMed Central 2022-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9102637/ /pubmed/35550214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00707-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Li
Hu, Qile
Wang, Lu
Shi, Huangwei
Lai, Changhua
Zhang, Shuai
Predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models
title Predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models
title_full Predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models
title_fullStr Predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models
title_short Predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models
title_sort predicting the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs based on net energy and digestible lysine intake using multiple regression and artificial neural networks models
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35550214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00707-1
work_keys_str_mv AT wangli predictingthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigsbasedonnetenergyanddigestiblelysineintakeusingmultipleregressionandartificialneuralnetworksmodels
AT huqile predictingthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigsbasedonnetenergyanddigestiblelysineintakeusingmultipleregressionandartificialneuralnetworksmodels
AT wanglu predictingthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigsbasedonnetenergyanddigestiblelysineintakeusingmultipleregressionandartificialneuralnetworksmodels
AT shihuangwei predictingthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigsbasedonnetenergyanddigestiblelysineintakeusingmultipleregressionandartificialneuralnetworksmodels
AT laichanghua predictingthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigsbasedonnetenergyanddigestiblelysineintakeusingmultipleregressionandartificialneuralnetworksmodels
AT zhangshuai predictingthegrowthperformanceofgrowingfinishingpigsbasedonnetenergyanddigestiblelysineintakeusingmultipleregressionandartificialneuralnetworksmodels