Cargando…

Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo—A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative

Background: When trying to modify urinary stents, certain pre-clinical steps have to be followed before clinical evaluation in humans. Usually, the process starts as an in silico assessment. The urinary tract is a highly complex, dynamic and variable environment, which makes a computer simulation cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buchholz, Noor, Budia, Alberto, de la Cruz, Julia, Kram, Wolfgang, Humphreys, Owen, Reches, Meital, Valero Boix, Raquel, Soria, Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14091641
_version_ 1784707426250915840
author Buchholz, Noor
Budia, Alberto
de la Cruz, Julia
Kram, Wolfgang
Humphreys, Owen
Reches, Meital
Valero Boix, Raquel
Soria, Federico
author_facet Buchholz, Noor
Budia, Alberto
de la Cruz, Julia
Kram, Wolfgang
Humphreys, Owen
Reches, Meital
Valero Boix, Raquel
Soria, Federico
author_sort Buchholz, Noor
collection PubMed
description Background: When trying to modify urinary stents, certain pre-clinical steps have to be followed before clinical evaluation in humans. Usually, the process starts as an in silico assessment. The urinary tract is a highly complex, dynamic and variable environment, which makes a computer simulation closely reflecting physiological conditions extremely challenging. Therefore, the pre-clinical evaluation needs to go through further steps of in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assessments. Methods and materials: Within the European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS), the authors summarized and evaluated stent assessment models in silico, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. The topic and relevant sub-topics were researched in a systematic literature search in Embase, Scope, Web of Science and PubMed. Clinicaltrials.gov was consulted for ongoing trials. Articles were selected systematically according to guidelines with non-relevant, non-complete, and non-English or Spanish language articles excluded. Results: In the first part of this paper, we critically evaluate in vitro stent assessment models used over the last five decades, outlining briefly their strengths and weaknesses. In the second part, we provide a step-by-step guide on what to consider when setting up an ex vivo model for stent evaluation on the example of a biodegradable stent. Lastly, the third part lists and discusses the pros and cons of available animal models for urinary stent evaluation, this being the final step before human trials. Conclusions: We hope that this overview can provide a practical guide and a critical discussion of the experimental pre-clinical evaluation steps needed, which will help interested readers in choosing the right methodology from the start of a stent evaluation process once an in silico assessment has been completed. Only a transparent multidisciplinary approach using the correct methodology will lead to a successful clinical implementation of any new or modified stent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9102855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91028552022-05-14 Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo—A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative Buchholz, Noor Budia, Alberto de la Cruz, Julia Kram, Wolfgang Humphreys, Owen Reches, Meital Valero Boix, Raquel Soria, Federico Polymers (Basel) Review Background: When trying to modify urinary stents, certain pre-clinical steps have to be followed before clinical evaluation in humans. Usually, the process starts as an in silico assessment. The urinary tract is a highly complex, dynamic and variable environment, which makes a computer simulation closely reflecting physiological conditions extremely challenging. Therefore, the pre-clinical evaluation needs to go through further steps of in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assessments. Methods and materials: Within the European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS), the authors summarized and evaluated stent assessment models in silico, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. The topic and relevant sub-topics were researched in a systematic literature search in Embase, Scope, Web of Science and PubMed. Clinicaltrials.gov was consulted for ongoing trials. Articles were selected systematically according to guidelines with non-relevant, non-complete, and non-English or Spanish language articles excluded. Results: In the first part of this paper, we critically evaluate in vitro stent assessment models used over the last five decades, outlining briefly their strengths and weaknesses. In the second part, we provide a step-by-step guide on what to consider when setting up an ex vivo model for stent evaluation on the example of a biodegradable stent. Lastly, the third part lists and discusses the pros and cons of available animal models for urinary stent evaluation, this being the final step before human trials. Conclusions: We hope that this overview can provide a practical guide and a critical discussion of the experimental pre-clinical evaluation steps needed, which will help interested readers in choosing the right methodology from the start of a stent evaluation process once an in silico assessment has been completed. Only a transparent multidisciplinary approach using the correct methodology will lead to a successful clinical implementation of any new or modified stent. MDPI 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9102855/ /pubmed/35566810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14091641 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Buchholz, Noor
Budia, Alberto
de la Cruz, Julia
Kram, Wolfgang
Humphreys, Owen
Reches, Meital
Valero Boix, Raquel
Soria, Federico
Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo—A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative
title Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo—A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative
title_full Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo—A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative
title_fullStr Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo—A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative
title_full_unstemmed Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo—A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative
title_short Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo—A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative
title_sort urinary stent development and evaluation models: in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo—a european network of multidisciplinary research to improve urinary stents (enius) initiative
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9102855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14091641
work_keys_str_mv AT buchholznoor urinarystentdevelopmentandevaluationmodelsinvitroexvivoandinvivoaeuropeannetworkofmultidisciplinaryresearchtoimproveurinarystentseniusinitiative
AT budiaalberto urinarystentdevelopmentandevaluationmodelsinvitroexvivoandinvivoaeuropeannetworkofmultidisciplinaryresearchtoimproveurinarystentseniusinitiative
AT delacruzjulia urinarystentdevelopmentandevaluationmodelsinvitroexvivoandinvivoaeuropeannetworkofmultidisciplinaryresearchtoimproveurinarystentseniusinitiative
AT kramwolfgang urinarystentdevelopmentandevaluationmodelsinvitroexvivoandinvivoaeuropeannetworkofmultidisciplinaryresearchtoimproveurinarystentseniusinitiative
AT humphreysowen urinarystentdevelopmentandevaluationmodelsinvitroexvivoandinvivoaeuropeannetworkofmultidisciplinaryresearchtoimproveurinarystentseniusinitiative
AT rechesmeital urinarystentdevelopmentandevaluationmodelsinvitroexvivoandinvivoaeuropeannetworkofmultidisciplinaryresearchtoimproveurinarystentseniusinitiative
AT valeroboixraquel urinarystentdevelopmentandevaluationmodelsinvitroexvivoandinvivoaeuropeannetworkofmultidisciplinaryresearchtoimproveurinarystentseniusinitiative
AT soriafederico urinarystentdevelopmentandevaluationmodelsinvitroexvivoandinvivoaeuropeannetworkofmultidisciplinaryresearchtoimproveurinarystentseniusinitiative