Cargando…
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced melanoma; however, a proportion of patients do not experience durable clinical benefit with these agents. Findings from a previous study suggested that the use of proton pump inhibitors while r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092300 |
_version_ | 1784707468128944128 |
---|---|
author | Homicsko, Krisztian Dummer, Reinhard Hoeller, Christoph Wolchok, Jedd D. Hodi, F. Stephen Larkin, James Ascierto, Paolo A. Atkinson, Victoria Robert, Caroline Postow, Michael A. Re, Sandra Paulucci, David Dobler, Darin Michielin, Olivier |
author_facet | Homicsko, Krisztian Dummer, Reinhard Hoeller, Christoph Wolchok, Jedd D. Hodi, F. Stephen Larkin, James Ascierto, Paolo A. Atkinson, Victoria Robert, Caroline Postow, Michael A. Re, Sandra Paulucci, David Dobler, Darin Michielin, Olivier |
author_sort | Homicsko, Krisztian |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced melanoma; however, a proportion of patients do not experience durable clinical benefit with these agents. Findings from a previous study suggested that the use of proton pump inhibitors while receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors may lead to worse clinical outcomes. To validate those results, we performed this retrospective analysis using data from three clinical trials involving patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We found that there is not enough evidence to conclude that proton pump inhibitors influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Prospective studies are needed to conclusively determine if the use of proton pump inhibitors has any meaningful impact on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma. ABSTRACT: The impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on clinical outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic melanoma was previously analyzed in the phase II study, CheckMate 069. This retrospective analysis utilized data from three phase II/III studies of first-line ICI therapy in untreated advanced melanoma: CheckMate 066, 067, and 069. All randomized patients with PPI use ≤ 30 days before initiating study treatment were included in the PPI-use subgroup. Possible associations between baseline PPI use and efficacy were evaluated within each treatment arm of each study using multivariable modeling. Approximately 20% of 1505 randomized patients across the studies reported baseline PPI use. The median follow-up was 52.6–58.5 months. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival analyses provided insufficient evidence of a meaningful association between PPI use and efficacy outcomes with nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab, nivolumab, or ipilimumab therapy. In five of the six ICI treatment arms, 95% confidence intervals for odds ratios or hazard ratios traversed 1. Significant associations were observed in the CheckMate 069 combination arm between PPI use and poorer ORR and PFS. This multivariable analysis found insufficient evidence to support meaningful associations between PPI use and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9103038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91030382022-05-14 Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma Homicsko, Krisztian Dummer, Reinhard Hoeller, Christoph Wolchok, Jedd D. Hodi, F. Stephen Larkin, James Ascierto, Paolo A. Atkinson, Victoria Robert, Caroline Postow, Michael A. Re, Sandra Paulucci, David Dobler, Darin Michielin, Olivier Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced melanoma; however, a proportion of patients do not experience durable clinical benefit with these agents. Findings from a previous study suggested that the use of proton pump inhibitors while receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors may lead to worse clinical outcomes. To validate those results, we performed this retrospective analysis using data from three clinical trials involving patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We found that there is not enough evidence to conclude that proton pump inhibitors influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Prospective studies are needed to conclusively determine if the use of proton pump inhibitors has any meaningful impact on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma. ABSTRACT: The impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on clinical outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic melanoma was previously analyzed in the phase II study, CheckMate 069. This retrospective analysis utilized data from three phase II/III studies of first-line ICI therapy in untreated advanced melanoma: CheckMate 066, 067, and 069. All randomized patients with PPI use ≤ 30 days before initiating study treatment were included in the PPI-use subgroup. Possible associations between baseline PPI use and efficacy were evaluated within each treatment arm of each study using multivariable modeling. Approximately 20% of 1505 randomized patients across the studies reported baseline PPI use. The median follow-up was 52.6–58.5 months. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival analyses provided insufficient evidence of a meaningful association between PPI use and efficacy outcomes with nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab, nivolumab, or ipilimumab therapy. In five of the six ICI treatment arms, 95% confidence intervals for odds ratios or hazard ratios traversed 1. Significant associations were observed in the CheckMate 069 combination arm between PPI use and poorer ORR and PFS. This multivariable analysis found insufficient evidence to support meaningful associations between PPI use and ICI efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma. MDPI 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9103038/ /pubmed/35565428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092300 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Homicsko, Krisztian Dummer, Reinhard Hoeller, Christoph Wolchok, Jedd D. Hodi, F. Stephen Larkin, James Ascierto, Paolo A. Atkinson, Victoria Robert, Caroline Postow, Michael A. Re, Sandra Paulucci, David Dobler, Darin Michielin, Olivier Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma |
title | Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma |
title_full | Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma |
title_fullStr | Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma |
title_short | Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Efficacy of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma |
title_sort | proton pump inhibitor use and efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35565428 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT homicskokrisztian protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT dummerreinhard protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT hoellerchristoph protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT wolchokjeddd protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT hodifstephen protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT larkinjames protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT asciertopaoloa protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT atkinsonvictoria protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT robertcaroline protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT postowmichaela protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT resandra protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT pauluccidavid protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT doblerdarin protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma AT michielinolivier protonpumpinhibitoruseandefficacyofnivolumabandipilimumabinadvancedmelanoma |