Cargando…

Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives

[Image: see text] The recovery of energy and valuable compounds from exhaust gases in the iron and steel industry deserves special attention due to the large power consumption and CO(2) emissions of the sector. In this sense, the hydrogen content of coke oven gas (COG) has positioned it as a promisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moral, Gonzalo, Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael, Ortiz, Alfredo, Gorri, Daniel, Ortiz, Inmaculada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04668
_version_ 1784707470550106112
author Moral, Gonzalo
Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael
Ortiz, Alfredo
Gorri, Daniel
Ortiz, Inmaculada
author_facet Moral, Gonzalo
Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael
Ortiz, Alfredo
Gorri, Daniel
Ortiz, Inmaculada
author_sort Moral, Gonzalo
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The recovery of energy and valuable compounds from exhaust gases in the iron and steel industry deserves special attention due to the large power consumption and CO(2) emissions of the sector. In this sense, the hydrogen content of coke oven gas (COG) has positioned it as a promising source toward a hydrogen-based economy which could lead to economic and environmental benefits in the iron and steel industry. COG is presently used for heating purposes in coke batteries or furnaces, while in high production rate periods, surplus COG is burnt in flares and discharged into the atmosphere. Thus, the recovery of the valuable compounds of surplus COG, with a special focus on hydrogen, will increase the efficiency in the iron and steel industry compared to the conventional thermal use of COG. Different routes have been explored for the recovery of hydrogen from COG so far: i) separation/purification processes with pressure swing adsorption or membrane technology, ii) conversion routes that provide additional hydrogen from the chemical transformation of the methane contained in COG, and iii) direct use of COG as fuel for internal combustion engines or gas turbines with the aim of power generation. In this study, the strengths and bottlenecks of the main hydrogen recovery routes from COG are reviewed and discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9103049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91030492022-05-14 Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives Moral, Gonzalo Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael Ortiz, Alfredo Gorri, Daniel Ortiz, Inmaculada Ind Eng Chem Res [Image: see text] The recovery of energy and valuable compounds from exhaust gases in the iron and steel industry deserves special attention due to the large power consumption and CO(2) emissions of the sector. In this sense, the hydrogen content of coke oven gas (COG) has positioned it as a promising source toward a hydrogen-based economy which could lead to economic and environmental benefits in the iron and steel industry. COG is presently used for heating purposes in coke batteries or furnaces, while in high production rate periods, surplus COG is burnt in flares and discharged into the atmosphere. Thus, the recovery of the valuable compounds of surplus COG, with a special focus on hydrogen, will increase the efficiency in the iron and steel industry compared to the conventional thermal use of COG. Different routes have been explored for the recovery of hydrogen from COG so far: i) separation/purification processes with pressure swing adsorption or membrane technology, ii) conversion routes that provide additional hydrogen from the chemical transformation of the methane contained in COG, and iii) direct use of COG as fuel for internal combustion engines or gas turbines with the aim of power generation. In this study, the strengths and bottlenecks of the main hydrogen recovery routes from COG are reviewed and discussed. American Chemical Society 2022-02-17 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9103049/ /pubmed/35578731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04668 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Moral, Gonzalo
Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael
Ortiz, Alfredo
Gorri, Daniel
Ortiz, Inmaculada
Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives
title Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives
title_full Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives
title_fullStr Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives
title_full_unstemmed Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives
title_short Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives
title_sort hydrogen recovery from coke oven gas. comparative analysis of technical alternatives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04668
work_keys_str_mv AT moralgonzalo hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives
AT ortizimediorafael hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives
AT ortizalfredo hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives
AT gorridaniel hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives
AT ortizinmaculada hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives