Cargando…
Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives
[Image: see text] The recovery of energy and valuable compounds from exhaust gases in the iron and steel industry deserves special attention due to the large power consumption and CO(2) emissions of the sector. In this sense, the hydrogen content of coke oven gas (COG) has positioned it as a promisi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04668 |
_version_ | 1784707470550106112 |
---|---|
author | Moral, Gonzalo Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael Ortiz, Alfredo Gorri, Daniel Ortiz, Inmaculada |
author_facet | Moral, Gonzalo Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael Ortiz, Alfredo Gorri, Daniel Ortiz, Inmaculada |
author_sort | Moral, Gonzalo |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The recovery of energy and valuable compounds from exhaust gases in the iron and steel industry deserves special attention due to the large power consumption and CO(2) emissions of the sector. In this sense, the hydrogen content of coke oven gas (COG) has positioned it as a promising source toward a hydrogen-based economy which could lead to economic and environmental benefits in the iron and steel industry. COG is presently used for heating purposes in coke batteries or furnaces, while in high production rate periods, surplus COG is burnt in flares and discharged into the atmosphere. Thus, the recovery of the valuable compounds of surplus COG, with a special focus on hydrogen, will increase the efficiency in the iron and steel industry compared to the conventional thermal use of COG. Different routes have been explored for the recovery of hydrogen from COG so far: i) separation/purification processes with pressure swing adsorption or membrane technology, ii) conversion routes that provide additional hydrogen from the chemical transformation of the methane contained in COG, and iii) direct use of COG as fuel for internal combustion engines or gas turbines with the aim of power generation. In this study, the strengths and bottlenecks of the main hydrogen recovery routes from COG are reviewed and discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9103049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91030492022-05-14 Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives Moral, Gonzalo Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael Ortiz, Alfredo Gorri, Daniel Ortiz, Inmaculada Ind Eng Chem Res [Image: see text] The recovery of energy and valuable compounds from exhaust gases in the iron and steel industry deserves special attention due to the large power consumption and CO(2) emissions of the sector. In this sense, the hydrogen content of coke oven gas (COG) has positioned it as a promising source toward a hydrogen-based economy which could lead to economic and environmental benefits in the iron and steel industry. COG is presently used for heating purposes in coke batteries or furnaces, while in high production rate periods, surplus COG is burnt in flares and discharged into the atmosphere. Thus, the recovery of the valuable compounds of surplus COG, with a special focus on hydrogen, will increase the efficiency in the iron and steel industry compared to the conventional thermal use of COG. Different routes have been explored for the recovery of hydrogen from COG so far: i) separation/purification processes with pressure swing adsorption or membrane technology, ii) conversion routes that provide additional hydrogen from the chemical transformation of the methane contained in COG, and iii) direct use of COG as fuel for internal combustion engines or gas turbines with the aim of power generation. In this study, the strengths and bottlenecks of the main hydrogen recovery routes from COG are reviewed and discussed. American Chemical Society 2022-02-17 2022-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9103049/ /pubmed/35578731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04668 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Moral, Gonzalo Ortiz-Imedio, Rafael Ortiz, Alfredo Gorri, Daniel Ortiz, Inmaculada Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative Analysis of Technical Alternatives |
title | Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative
Analysis of Technical Alternatives |
title_full | Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative
Analysis of Technical Alternatives |
title_fullStr | Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative
Analysis of Technical Alternatives |
title_full_unstemmed | Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative
Analysis of Technical Alternatives |
title_short | Hydrogen Recovery from Coke Oven Gas. Comparative
Analysis of Technical Alternatives |
title_sort | hydrogen recovery from coke oven gas. comparative
analysis of technical alternatives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35578731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moralgonzalo hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives AT ortizimediorafael hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives AT ortizalfredo hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives AT gorridaniel hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives AT ortizinmaculada hydrogenrecoveryfromcokeovengascomparativeanalysisoftechnicalalternatives |