Cargando…

An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings

The main objectives of this work were to assess the efficiency, ease-of-use, and general performance of a novel osseoshaping tool based on first-user clinical experiences and to compare these observations with preclinical data generated in rodents using a miniaturized version of the instrument. All...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahat, Oded, Yin, Xing, Holst, Stefan, Zabalegui, Ion, Berroeta, Eva, Pérez, Javier, Wöhrle, Peter, Sörgel, Norbert, Brunski, John, Helms, Jill A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092536
_version_ 1784707508094369792
author Bahat, Oded
Yin, Xing
Holst, Stefan
Zabalegui, Ion
Berroeta, Eva
Pérez, Javier
Wöhrle, Peter
Sörgel, Norbert
Brunski, John
Helms, Jill A.
author_facet Bahat, Oded
Yin, Xing
Holst, Stefan
Zabalegui, Ion
Berroeta, Eva
Pérez, Javier
Wöhrle, Peter
Sörgel, Norbert
Brunski, John
Helms, Jill A.
author_sort Bahat, Oded
collection PubMed
description The main objectives of this work were to assess the efficiency, ease-of-use, and general performance of a novel osseoshaping tool based on first-user clinical experiences and to compare these observations with preclinical data generated in rodents using a miniaturized version of the instrument. All patients selected for the surgery presented challenging clinical conditions in terms of the quality and/or quantity of the available bone. The presented data were collected during the implant placement of 15 implants in 7 patients, and included implant recipient site (bone quality and quantity) and ridge evaluation, intra-operative handling of the novel instrument, and the evaluation of subsequent implant insertion. The instrument was easy to handle and was applied without any complications during the surgical procedure. Its use obviated the need for multiple drills and enabled adequate insertion torque in all cases. This biologically driven innovation in implant site preparation shows improvements in preserving vital anatomical and cellular structures as well as simplifying the surgical protocol with excellent ease-of-use and handling properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9103213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91032132022-05-14 An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings Bahat, Oded Yin, Xing Holst, Stefan Zabalegui, Ion Berroeta, Eva Pérez, Javier Wöhrle, Peter Sörgel, Norbert Brunski, John Helms, Jill A. J Clin Med Article The main objectives of this work were to assess the efficiency, ease-of-use, and general performance of a novel osseoshaping tool based on first-user clinical experiences and to compare these observations with preclinical data generated in rodents using a miniaturized version of the instrument. All patients selected for the surgery presented challenging clinical conditions in terms of the quality and/or quantity of the available bone. The presented data were collected during the implant placement of 15 implants in 7 patients, and included implant recipient site (bone quality and quantity) and ridge evaluation, intra-operative handling of the novel instrument, and the evaluation of subsequent implant insertion. The instrument was easy to handle and was applied without any complications during the surgical procedure. Its use obviated the need for multiple drills and enabled adequate insertion torque in all cases. This biologically driven innovation in implant site preparation shows improvements in preserving vital anatomical and cellular structures as well as simplifying the surgical protocol with excellent ease-of-use and handling properties. MDPI 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9103213/ /pubmed/35566662 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092536 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bahat, Oded
Yin, Xing
Holst, Stefan
Zabalegui, Ion
Berroeta, Eva
Pérez, Javier
Wöhrle, Peter
Sörgel, Norbert
Brunski, John
Helms, Jill A.
An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings
title An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings
title_full An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings
title_fullStr An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings
title_full_unstemmed An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings
title_short An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings
title_sort osteotomy tool that preserves bone viability: evaluation in preclinical and clinical settings
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566662
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092536
work_keys_str_mv AT bahatoded anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT yinxing anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT holststefan anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT zabaleguiion anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT berroetaeva anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT perezjavier anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT wohrlepeter anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT sorgelnorbert anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT brunskijohn anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT helmsjilla anosteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT bahatoded osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT yinxing osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT holststefan osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT zabaleguiion osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT berroetaeva osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT perezjavier osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT wohrlepeter osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT sorgelnorbert osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT brunskijohn osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings
AT helmsjilla osteotomytoolthatpreservesboneviabilityevaluationinpreclinicalandclinicalsettings