Cargando…
Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to differentiate the functional or aesthetic factors affecting the result of septorhinoplasty and to determine the most important factor related to patient satisfaction. METHODS: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for obstruction (VAS-O) an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634229 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2022.2021-12-10 |
_version_ | 1784707587819700224 |
---|---|
author | Kemal, Özgür Tahir, Emel Kavaz, Esra Karabulut, Hüseyin |
author_facet | Kemal, Özgür Tahir, Emel Kavaz, Esra Karabulut, Hüseyin |
author_sort | Kemal, Özgür |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to differentiate the functional or aesthetic factors affecting the result of septorhinoplasty and to determine the most important factor related to patient satisfaction. METHODS: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for obstruction (VAS-O) and for appearance (VAS-A) were administered to fifty-five patients undergoing septorhinoplasty preoperatively and six months after the surgery. VAS scores were evaluated as follows: VAS-O (0: unblocked, 10: completely blocked) and VAS-A (0: worst appearance, 10: best appearance). ROE scores were calculated between 0 and 100. In order to examine the relationship between the measurements and determine the most powerful item that affects the overall ROE score, path analysis was performed, and the path coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: The mean VAS-O and VAS-A scores before and after surgery were 6.85 and 4.36, and 3.91 and 7.22, respectively (p<0.001). The absolute value of mean difference was greater for VAS-A (-3.31) than VAS-O (-2.49), which also means appearance scores were more widely affected. The mean ROE score was increased from 46.36±9.28 to 78.85±11.70. VAS-A score had a significant impact on the overall ROE score (β=0.782, p=0.001), while the VAS-O score had no impact. The least effective item on the overall ROE score was item 2 (β=0.445), while the other items related to aesthetic outcome had higher Path coefficients. CONCLUSION: Although septorhinoplasty provides satisfactory results in both functional and aesthetic aspects, patients are more satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9103569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91035692022-05-26 Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty Kemal, Özgür Tahir, Emel Kavaz, Esra Karabulut, Hüseyin Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to differentiate the functional or aesthetic factors affecting the result of septorhinoplasty and to determine the most important factor related to patient satisfaction. METHODS: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for obstruction (VAS-O) and for appearance (VAS-A) were administered to fifty-five patients undergoing septorhinoplasty preoperatively and six months after the surgery. VAS scores were evaluated as follows: VAS-O (0: unblocked, 10: completely blocked) and VAS-A (0: worst appearance, 10: best appearance). ROE scores were calculated between 0 and 100. In order to examine the relationship between the measurements and determine the most powerful item that affects the overall ROE score, path analysis was performed, and the path coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: The mean VAS-O and VAS-A scores before and after surgery were 6.85 and 4.36, and 3.91 and 7.22, respectively (p<0.001). The absolute value of mean difference was greater for VAS-A (-3.31) than VAS-O (-2.49), which also means appearance scores were more widely affected. The mean ROE score was increased from 46.36±9.28 to 78.85±11.70. VAS-A score had a significant impact on the overall ROE score (β=0.782, p=0.001), while the VAS-O score had no impact. The least effective item on the overall ROE score was item 2 (β=0.445), while the other items related to aesthetic outcome had higher Path coefficients. CONCLUSION: Although septorhinoplasty provides satisfactory results in both functional and aesthetic aspects, patients are more satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes. Galenos Publishing 2022-03 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9103569/ /pubmed/35634229 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2022.2021-12-10 Text en ©Copyright 2022 by Official Journal of the Turkish Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Kemal, Özgür Tahir, Emel Kavaz, Esra Karabulut, Hüseyin Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty |
title | Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty |
title_full | Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty |
title_fullStr | Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty |
title_short | Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty |
title_sort | impact of functional and aesthetic factors on patient satisfaction in septorhinoplasty |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634229 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2022.2021-12-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kemalozgur impactoffunctionalandaestheticfactorsonpatientsatisfactioninseptorhinoplasty AT tahiremel impactoffunctionalandaestheticfactorsonpatientsatisfactioninseptorhinoplasty AT kavazesra impactoffunctionalandaestheticfactorsonpatientsatisfactioninseptorhinoplasty AT karabuluthuseyin impactoffunctionalandaestheticfactorsonpatientsatisfactioninseptorhinoplasty |