Cargando…

Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to differentiate the functional or aesthetic factors affecting the result of septorhinoplasty and to determine the most important factor related to patient satisfaction. METHODS: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for obstruction (VAS-O) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kemal, Özgür, Tahir, Emel, Kavaz, Esra, Karabulut, Hüseyin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634229
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2022.2021-12-10
_version_ 1784707587819700224
author Kemal, Özgür
Tahir, Emel
Kavaz, Esra
Karabulut, Hüseyin
author_facet Kemal, Özgür
Tahir, Emel
Kavaz, Esra
Karabulut, Hüseyin
author_sort Kemal, Özgür
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to differentiate the functional or aesthetic factors affecting the result of septorhinoplasty and to determine the most important factor related to patient satisfaction. METHODS: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for obstruction (VAS-O) and for appearance (VAS-A) were administered to fifty-five patients undergoing septorhinoplasty preoperatively and six months after the surgery. VAS scores were evaluated as follows: VAS-O (0: unblocked, 10: completely blocked) and VAS-A (0: worst appearance, 10: best appearance). ROE scores were calculated between 0 and 100. In order to examine the relationship between the measurements and determine the most powerful item that affects the overall ROE score, path analysis was performed, and the path coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: The mean VAS-O and VAS-A scores before and after surgery were 6.85 and 4.36, and 3.91 and 7.22, respectively (p<0.001). The absolute value of mean difference was greater for VAS-A (-3.31) than VAS-O (-2.49), which also means appearance scores were more widely affected. The mean ROE score was increased from 46.36±9.28 to 78.85±11.70. VAS-A score had a significant impact on the overall ROE score (β=0.782, p=0.001), while the VAS-O score had no impact. The least effective item on the overall ROE score was item 2 (β=0.445), while the other items related to aesthetic outcome had higher Path coefficients. CONCLUSION: Although septorhinoplasty provides satisfactory results in both functional and aesthetic aspects, patients are more satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9103569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91035692022-05-26 Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty Kemal, Özgür Tahir, Emel Kavaz, Esra Karabulut, Hüseyin Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to differentiate the functional or aesthetic factors affecting the result of septorhinoplasty and to determine the most important factor related to patient satisfaction. METHODS: Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for obstruction (VAS-O) and for appearance (VAS-A) were administered to fifty-five patients undergoing septorhinoplasty preoperatively and six months after the surgery. VAS scores were evaluated as follows: VAS-O (0: unblocked, 10: completely blocked) and VAS-A (0: worst appearance, 10: best appearance). ROE scores were calculated between 0 and 100. In order to examine the relationship between the measurements and determine the most powerful item that affects the overall ROE score, path analysis was performed, and the path coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: The mean VAS-O and VAS-A scores before and after surgery were 6.85 and 4.36, and 3.91 and 7.22, respectively (p<0.001). The absolute value of mean difference was greater for VAS-A (-3.31) than VAS-O (-2.49), which also means appearance scores were more widely affected. The mean ROE score was increased from 46.36±9.28 to 78.85±11.70. VAS-A score had a significant impact on the overall ROE score (β=0.782, p=0.001), while the VAS-O score had no impact. The least effective item on the overall ROE score was item 2 (β=0.445), while the other items related to aesthetic outcome had higher Path coefficients. CONCLUSION: Although septorhinoplasty provides satisfactory results in both functional and aesthetic aspects, patients are more satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes. Galenos Publishing 2022-03 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9103569/ /pubmed/35634229 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2022.2021-12-10 Text en ©Copyright 2022 by Official Journal of the Turkish Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Kemal, Özgür
Tahir, Emel
Kavaz, Esra
Karabulut, Hüseyin
Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty
title Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty
title_full Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty
title_fullStr Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty
title_short Impact of Functional and Aesthetic Factors on Patient Satisfaction in Septorhinoplasty
title_sort impact of functional and aesthetic factors on patient satisfaction in septorhinoplasty
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634229
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tao.2022.2021-12-10
work_keys_str_mv AT kemalozgur impactoffunctionalandaestheticfactorsonpatientsatisfactioninseptorhinoplasty
AT tahiremel impactoffunctionalandaestheticfactorsonpatientsatisfactioninseptorhinoplasty
AT kavazesra impactoffunctionalandaestheticfactorsonpatientsatisfactioninseptorhinoplasty
AT karabuluthuseyin impactoffunctionalandaestheticfactorsonpatientsatisfactioninseptorhinoplasty