Cargando…

Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH(+) of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population

Background: Operative management of proximal humeral fractures is still challenging. While antegrade nailing has become a valid option in fracture fixation, risk factors for adverse events, and failure have not been sufficiently clarified. Methods: All patients of a single trauma center undergoing s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willauschus, Maximilian, Schram, Linus, Millrose, Michael, Rüther, Johannes, Loose, Kim, Bail, Hermann Josef, Geßlein, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092523
_version_ 1784707607627300864
author Willauschus, Maximilian
Schram, Linus
Millrose, Michael
Rüther, Johannes
Loose, Kim
Bail, Hermann Josef
Geßlein, Markus
author_facet Willauschus, Maximilian
Schram, Linus
Millrose, Michael
Rüther, Johannes
Loose, Kim
Bail, Hermann Josef
Geßlein, Markus
author_sort Willauschus, Maximilian
collection PubMed
description Background: Operative management of proximal humeral fractures is still challenging. While antegrade nailing has become a valid option in fracture fixation, risk factors for adverse events, and failure have not been sufficiently clarified. Methods: All patients of a single trauma center undergoing surgery for proximal humeral fractures with the Targon PH(+) nail between 2014 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. This included complications, revisions, and failures. Pre- and postoperative radiographic imaging were assessed regarding fracture’s complexity, anatomic reduction, reconstruction of the medial hinge, metaphyseal head extension, and fixation of the implant in the calcar region. Follow-up was at a minimum of 12 months. Results: A total number of 130 patients with a mean age of 74.5 years (range 63–94, SD ± 8.2) are included in this study. Two- and three-part fractures were found in 58 patients, while 14 patients showed four-part fractures. Overall, a complication rate of 34.2% and an implant failure rate of 15.4% was found. Four-part fractures showed a significantly higher complication rate than two- and three-part fractures. Four-part fractures also showed significantly higher revisions (p = 0.005) and implant failures (p = 0.008). The nonsufficient anatomical reduction was found to be a risk factor for complications (p < 0.0001), implant failures (p < 0.0001), and later humeral head osteonecrosis (p < 0.0001). Insufficiently reconstructed medial hinges (p = 0.002) and a metaphyseal head extension of over 8 mm (p = 0.005) were also demonstrated as risk factors for osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Conclusions: Four-part fractures in an elderly population show high complication, revision, and implant-failure rates. Therefore, demonstrated radiologic risk factors should be evaluated for improvements. Anatomical reduction and fixation near the calcar proved to be vital for successful antegrade nailing of complex fractures. To prevent osteonecrosis of the humeral head, reconstruction of the medial hinge and metaphyseal head extension should be evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9103667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91036672022-05-14 Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH(+) of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population Willauschus, Maximilian Schram, Linus Millrose, Michael Rüther, Johannes Loose, Kim Bail, Hermann Josef Geßlein, Markus J Clin Med Article Background: Operative management of proximal humeral fractures is still challenging. While antegrade nailing has become a valid option in fracture fixation, risk factors for adverse events, and failure have not been sufficiently clarified. Methods: All patients of a single trauma center undergoing surgery for proximal humeral fractures with the Targon PH(+) nail between 2014 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. This included complications, revisions, and failures. Pre- and postoperative radiographic imaging were assessed regarding fracture’s complexity, anatomic reduction, reconstruction of the medial hinge, metaphyseal head extension, and fixation of the implant in the calcar region. Follow-up was at a minimum of 12 months. Results: A total number of 130 patients with a mean age of 74.5 years (range 63–94, SD ± 8.2) are included in this study. Two- and three-part fractures were found in 58 patients, while 14 patients showed four-part fractures. Overall, a complication rate of 34.2% and an implant failure rate of 15.4% was found. Four-part fractures showed a significantly higher complication rate than two- and three-part fractures. Four-part fractures also showed significantly higher revisions (p = 0.005) and implant failures (p = 0.008). The nonsufficient anatomical reduction was found to be a risk factor for complications (p < 0.0001), implant failures (p < 0.0001), and later humeral head osteonecrosis (p < 0.0001). Insufficiently reconstructed medial hinges (p = 0.002) and a metaphyseal head extension of over 8 mm (p = 0.005) were also demonstrated as risk factors for osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Conclusions: Four-part fractures in an elderly population show high complication, revision, and implant-failure rates. Therefore, demonstrated radiologic risk factors should be evaluated for improvements. Anatomical reduction and fixation near the calcar proved to be vital for successful antegrade nailing of complex fractures. To prevent osteonecrosis of the humeral head, reconstruction of the medial hinge and metaphyseal head extension should be evaluated. MDPI 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9103667/ /pubmed/35566649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092523 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Willauschus, Maximilian
Schram, Linus
Millrose, Michael
Rüther, Johannes
Loose, Kim
Bail, Hermann Josef
Geßlein, Markus
Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH(+) of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population
title Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH(+) of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population
title_full Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH(+) of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population
title_fullStr Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH(+) of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population
title_full_unstemmed Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH(+) of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population
title_short Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH(+) of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population
title_sort specific radiologic risk factors for implant failure and osteonecrosis of the humeral head after interlocking nailing with the targon ph(+) of proximal humeral fractures in a middle to old population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35566649
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092523
work_keys_str_mv AT willauschusmaximilian specificradiologicriskfactorsforimplantfailureandosteonecrosisofthehumeralheadafterinterlockingnailingwiththetargonphofproximalhumeralfracturesinamiddletooldpopulation
AT schramlinus specificradiologicriskfactorsforimplantfailureandosteonecrosisofthehumeralheadafterinterlockingnailingwiththetargonphofproximalhumeralfracturesinamiddletooldpopulation
AT millrosemichael specificradiologicriskfactorsforimplantfailureandosteonecrosisofthehumeralheadafterinterlockingnailingwiththetargonphofproximalhumeralfracturesinamiddletooldpopulation
AT rutherjohannes specificradiologicriskfactorsforimplantfailureandosteonecrosisofthehumeralheadafterinterlockingnailingwiththetargonphofproximalhumeralfracturesinamiddletooldpopulation
AT loosekim specificradiologicriskfactorsforimplantfailureandosteonecrosisofthehumeralheadafterinterlockingnailingwiththetargonphofproximalhumeralfracturesinamiddletooldpopulation
AT bailhermannjosef specificradiologicriskfactorsforimplantfailureandosteonecrosisofthehumeralheadafterinterlockingnailingwiththetargonphofproximalhumeralfracturesinamiddletooldpopulation
AT geßleinmarkus specificradiologicriskfactorsforimplantfailureandosteonecrosisofthehumeralheadafterinterlockingnailingwiththetargonphofproximalhumeralfracturesinamiddletooldpopulation