Cargando…

Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods

In the last decade, there has been a steady stream of information on the methods and techniques available for detecting harmful algae species. The conventional approaches to identify harmful algal bloom (HAB), such as microscopy and molecular biological methods are mainly laboratory-based and requir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chin Chwan Chuong, Jeremy Jason, Rahman, Mahbubur, Ibrahim, Nadiah, Heng, Lee Yook, Tan, Ling Ling, Ahmad, Asmat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093144
_version_ 1784707624255619072
author Chin Chwan Chuong, Jeremy Jason
Rahman, Mahbubur
Ibrahim, Nadiah
Heng, Lee Yook
Tan, Ling Ling
Ahmad, Asmat
author_facet Chin Chwan Chuong, Jeremy Jason
Rahman, Mahbubur
Ibrahim, Nadiah
Heng, Lee Yook
Tan, Ling Ling
Ahmad, Asmat
author_sort Chin Chwan Chuong, Jeremy Jason
collection PubMed
description In the last decade, there has been a steady stream of information on the methods and techniques available for detecting harmful algae species. The conventional approaches to identify harmful algal bloom (HAB), such as microscopy and molecular biological methods are mainly laboratory-based and require long assay times, skilled manpower, and pre-enrichment of samples involving various pre-experimental preparations. As an alternative, biosensors with a simple and rapid detection strategy could be an improvement over conventional methods for the detection of toxic algae species. Moreover, recent biosensors that involve the use of nanomaterials to detect HAB are showing further enhanced detection limits with a broader linear range. The improvement is attributed to nanomaterials’ high surface area to volume ratio, excellent biological compatibility with biomolecules, and being capable of amplifying the electrochemical signal. Hence, this review presents the potential usage of biosensors over conventional methods to detect HABs. The methods reported for the detection of harmful algae species, ranging from conventional detection methods to current biosensor approaches will be discussed, along with their respective advantages and drawbacks to indicate the future prospects of biosensor technology for HAB event management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9103738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91037382022-05-14 Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods Chin Chwan Chuong, Jeremy Jason Rahman, Mahbubur Ibrahim, Nadiah Heng, Lee Yook Tan, Ling Ling Ahmad, Asmat Sensors (Basel) Review In the last decade, there has been a steady stream of information on the methods and techniques available for detecting harmful algae species. The conventional approaches to identify harmful algal bloom (HAB), such as microscopy and molecular biological methods are mainly laboratory-based and require long assay times, skilled manpower, and pre-enrichment of samples involving various pre-experimental preparations. As an alternative, biosensors with a simple and rapid detection strategy could be an improvement over conventional methods for the detection of toxic algae species. Moreover, recent biosensors that involve the use of nanomaterials to detect HAB are showing further enhanced detection limits with a broader linear range. The improvement is attributed to nanomaterials’ high surface area to volume ratio, excellent biological compatibility with biomolecules, and being capable of amplifying the electrochemical signal. Hence, this review presents the potential usage of biosensors over conventional methods to detect HABs. The methods reported for the detection of harmful algae species, ranging from conventional detection methods to current biosensor approaches will be discussed, along with their respective advantages and drawbacks to indicate the future prospects of biosensor technology for HAB event management. MDPI 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9103738/ /pubmed/35590834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093144 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chin Chwan Chuong, Jeremy Jason
Rahman, Mahbubur
Ibrahim, Nadiah
Heng, Lee Yook
Tan, Ling Ling
Ahmad, Asmat
Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods
title Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods
title_full Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods
title_fullStr Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods
title_full_unstemmed Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods
title_short Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods
title_sort harmful microalgae detection: biosensors versus some conventional methods
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22093144
work_keys_str_mv AT chinchwanchuongjeremyjason harmfulmicroalgaedetectionbiosensorsversussomeconventionalmethods
AT rahmanmahbubur harmfulmicroalgaedetectionbiosensorsversussomeconventionalmethods
AT ibrahimnadiah harmfulmicroalgaedetectionbiosensorsversussomeconventionalmethods
AT hengleeyook harmfulmicroalgaedetectionbiosensorsversussomeconventionalmethods
AT tanlingling harmfulmicroalgaedetectionbiosensorsversussomeconventionalmethods
AT ahmadasmat harmfulmicroalgaedetectionbiosensorsversussomeconventionalmethods