Cargando…

Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Fresh blood immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, based on the reliable simultaneous detection of several markers in a cell, is the method of choice to study the circulating human immune system. Especially in large and multicenter studies, high sample quality is difficult to achieve, and adequate col...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serra, Valentina, Orrù, Valeria, Lai, Sandra, Lobina, Monia, Steri, Maristella, Cucca, Francesco, Fiorillo, Edoardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35563832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11091527
_version_ 1784707659430100992
author Serra, Valentina
Orrù, Valeria
Lai, Sandra
Lobina, Monia
Steri, Maristella
Cucca, Francesco
Fiorillo, Edoardo
author_facet Serra, Valentina
Orrù, Valeria
Lai, Sandra
Lobina, Monia
Steri, Maristella
Cucca, Francesco
Fiorillo, Edoardo
author_sort Serra, Valentina
collection PubMed
description Fresh blood immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, based on the reliable simultaneous detection of several markers in a cell, is the method of choice to study the circulating human immune system. Especially in large and multicenter studies, high sample quality is difficult to achieve, and adequate collection and storage of samples with fine-tuned whole blood cryopreservation is mandatory. Here, we compared the quality of immunophenotypic data obtained from fresh blood with those obtained after five cryopreservation methods by quantifying the levels of 41 immune cell populations. They comprised B and T lymphocyte subsets and their maturation stages, as well as monocytes and granulocytes. Three methods used fixative solutions and two other methods used dimethyl sulfoxide solutions to preserve cell viability. The fixative methods prevented detection of markers critical for identification of B and T cell subsets, including CD27, CXCR3, and CCR6. The other two methods permitted reliable discrimination of most immune-cell populations in thawed samples, though some cell frequencies varied compared to the corresponding fresh sample. Of those two methods, the one preserving blood in media containing dimethyl sulfoxide produced results that were most similar to those with fresh samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9103885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91038852022-05-14 Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Serra, Valentina Orrù, Valeria Lai, Sandra Lobina, Monia Steri, Maristella Cucca, Francesco Fiorillo, Edoardo Cells Article Fresh blood immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, based on the reliable simultaneous detection of several markers in a cell, is the method of choice to study the circulating human immune system. Especially in large and multicenter studies, high sample quality is difficult to achieve, and adequate collection and storage of samples with fine-tuned whole blood cryopreservation is mandatory. Here, we compared the quality of immunophenotypic data obtained from fresh blood with those obtained after five cryopreservation methods by quantifying the levels of 41 immune cell populations. They comprised B and T lymphocyte subsets and their maturation stages, as well as monocytes and granulocytes. Three methods used fixative solutions and two other methods used dimethyl sulfoxide solutions to preserve cell viability. The fixative methods prevented detection of markers critical for identification of B and T cell subsets, including CD27, CXCR3, and CCR6. The other two methods permitted reliable discrimination of most immune-cell populations in thawed samples, though some cell frequencies varied compared to the corresponding fresh sample. Of those two methods, the one preserving blood in media containing dimethyl sulfoxide produced results that were most similar to those with fresh samples. MDPI 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9103885/ /pubmed/35563832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11091527 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Serra, Valentina
Orrù, Valeria
Lai, Sandra
Lobina, Monia
Steri, Maristella
Cucca, Francesco
Fiorillo, Edoardo
Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping
title Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping
title_full Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping
title_fullStr Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping
title_short Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping
title_sort comparison of whole blood cryopreservation methods for extensive flow cytometry immunophenotyping
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35563832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11091527
work_keys_str_mv AT serravalentina comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping
AT orruvaleria comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping
AT laisandra comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping
AT lobinamonia comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping
AT sterimaristella comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping
AT cuccafrancesco comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping
AT fiorilloedoardo comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping