Cargando…
Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping
Fresh blood immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, based on the reliable simultaneous detection of several markers in a cell, is the method of choice to study the circulating human immune system. Especially in large and multicenter studies, high sample quality is difficult to achieve, and adequate col...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35563832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11091527 |
_version_ | 1784707659430100992 |
---|---|
author | Serra, Valentina Orrù, Valeria Lai, Sandra Lobina, Monia Steri, Maristella Cucca, Francesco Fiorillo, Edoardo |
author_facet | Serra, Valentina Orrù, Valeria Lai, Sandra Lobina, Monia Steri, Maristella Cucca, Francesco Fiorillo, Edoardo |
author_sort | Serra, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fresh blood immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, based on the reliable simultaneous detection of several markers in a cell, is the method of choice to study the circulating human immune system. Especially in large and multicenter studies, high sample quality is difficult to achieve, and adequate collection and storage of samples with fine-tuned whole blood cryopreservation is mandatory. Here, we compared the quality of immunophenotypic data obtained from fresh blood with those obtained after five cryopreservation methods by quantifying the levels of 41 immune cell populations. They comprised B and T lymphocyte subsets and their maturation stages, as well as monocytes and granulocytes. Three methods used fixative solutions and two other methods used dimethyl sulfoxide solutions to preserve cell viability. The fixative methods prevented detection of markers critical for identification of B and T cell subsets, including CD27, CXCR3, and CCR6. The other two methods permitted reliable discrimination of most immune-cell populations in thawed samples, though some cell frequencies varied compared to the corresponding fresh sample. Of those two methods, the one preserving blood in media containing dimethyl sulfoxide produced results that were most similar to those with fresh samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9103885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91038852022-05-14 Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Serra, Valentina Orrù, Valeria Lai, Sandra Lobina, Monia Steri, Maristella Cucca, Francesco Fiorillo, Edoardo Cells Article Fresh blood immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, based on the reliable simultaneous detection of several markers in a cell, is the method of choice to study the circulating human immune system. Especially in large and multicenter studies, high sample quality is difficult to achieve, and adequate collection and storage of samples with fine-tuned whole blood cryopreservation is mandatory. Here, we compared the quality of immunophenotypic data obtained from fresh blood with those obtained after five cryopreservation methods by quantifying the levels of 41 immune cell populations. They comprised B and T lymphocyte subsets and their maturation stages, as well as monocytes and granulocytes. Three methods used fixative solutions and two other methods used dimethyl sulfoxide solutions to preserve cell viability. The fixative methods prevented detection of markers critical for identification of B and T cell subsets, including CD27, CXCR3, and CCR6. The other two methods permitted reliable discrimination of most immune-cell populations in thawed samples, though some cell frequencies varied compared to the corresponding fresh sample. Of those two methods, the one preserving blood in media containing dimethyl sulfoxide produced results that were most similar to those with fresh samples. MDPI 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9103885/ /pubmed/35563832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11091527 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Serra, Valentina Orrù, Valeria Lai, Sandra Lobina, Monia Steri, Maristella Cucca, Francesco Fiorillo, Edoardo Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping |
title | Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping |
title_full | Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping |
title_short | Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping |
title_sort | comparison of whole blood cryopreservation methods for extensive flow cytometry immunophenotyping |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35563832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11091527 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serravalentina comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping AT orruvaleria comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping AT laisandra comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping AT lobinamonia comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping AT sterimaristella comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping AT cuccafrancesco comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping AT fiorilloedoardo comparisonofwholebloodcryopreservationmethodsforextensiveflowcytometryimmunophenotyping |